» Articles » PMID: 35494547

Active Stabilization of Interventional Tasks Utilizing a Magnetically Manipulated Endoscope

Overview
Journal Front Robot AI
Date 2022 May 2
PMID 35494547
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Magnetically actuated robots have become increasingly popular in medical endoscopy over the past decade. Despite the significant improvements in autonomy and control methods, progress within the field of medical magnetic endoscopes has mainly been in the domain of enhanced navigation. Interventional tasks such as biopsy, polyp removal, and clip placement are a major procedural component of endoscopy. Little advancement has been done in this area due to the problem of adequately controlling and stabilizing magnetically actuated endoscopes for interventional tasks. In the present paper we discuss a novel Linear Parameter Varying (LPV) control approach to provide stability during interventional maneuvers. This method linearizes the non-linear dynamic interaction between the external actuation system and the endoscope in a set of equilibria, associated to different distances between the magnetic source and the endoscope, and computes different controllers for each equilibrium. This approach provides the global stability of the overall system and robustness against external disturbances. The performance of the LPV approach is compared to an intelligent teleoperation control method (based on a Proportional Integral Derivative (PID) controller), on the Magnetic Flexible Endoscope (MFE) platform. Four biopsies in different regions of the colon and at two different system equilibria are performed. Both controllers are asked to stabilize the endoscope in the presence of external disturbances (i.e. the introduction of the biopsy forceps through the working channel of the endoscope). The experiments, performed in a benchtop colon simulator, show a maximum reduction of the mean orientation error of the endoscope of 45.8 with the LPV control compared to the PID controller.

References
1.
Peixoto A, Silva M, Pereira P, Macedo G . Biopsies in Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: When and How. GE Port J Gastroenterol. 2017; 23(1):19-27. PMC: 5580003. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpge.2015.07.004. View

2.
Hoang M, Le V, Nguyen K, Nguyen V, Kim J, Choi E . A Robotic Biopsy Endoscope with Magnetic 5-DOF Locomotion and a Retractable Biopsy Punch. Micromachines (Basel). 2020; 11(1). PMC: 7020148. DOI: 10.3390/mi11010098. View

3.
Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel R, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A . Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021; 71(3):209-249. DOI: 10.3322/caac.21660. View

4.
Taddese A, Slawinski P, Obstein K, Valdastri P . Nonholonomic Closed-loop Velocity Control of a Soft-tethered Magnetic Capsule Endoscope. Rep U S. 2017; 2016:1139-1144. PMC: 5354359. DOI: 10.1109/IROS.2016.7759192. View

5.
Taddese A, Slawinski P, Pirotta M, Momi E, Obstein K, Valdastri P . Enhanced Real-Time Pose Estimation for Closed-Loop Robotic Manipulation of Magnetically Actuated Capsule Endoscopes. Int J Rob Res. 2018; 37(8):890-911. PMC: 6108552. DOI: 10.1177/0278364918779132. View