» Articles » PMID: 35473378

Familiarity Mediates Apes' Attentional Biases Toward Human Faces

Overview
Journal Proc Biol Sci
Specialty Biology
Date 2022 Apr 27
PMID 35473378
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In zoos, primates experience markedly different interactions with familiar humans, such as the zookeepers who care for them, compared with those with unfamiliar humans, such as the large volume of zoo visitors to whom they are regularly exposed. While the behaviour of zoo-housed primates in the presence of unfamiliar, and to a lesser extent familiar, humans has received considerable attention, if and how they spontaneously distinguish familiar from unfamiliar people, and the cognitive mechanisms underlying the relationships they form with familiar and unfamiliar humans, remain poorly understood. Using a dot-probe paradigm, we assessed whether primates (chimpanzees and gorillas) show an attentional bias toward the faces of familiar humans, with whom the apes presumably had a positive relationship. Contrary to our predictions, all subjects showed a significant attentional bias toward unfamiliar people's faces compared with familiar people's faces when the faces showed a neutral expression, both with and without a surgical face mask on, but no significant attentional bias when the faces showed a surprised expression. These results demonstrate that apes can spontaneously categorize humans based on familiarity and we argue that the attentional biases the apes showed for unfamiliar human faces reflect a novelty effect.

Citing Articles

Effects of experience and familiarity on visual attention and behaviours of bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus) in presence of humans.

Gallo A, Gojceta R, Boye M, Lemasson A, Hausberger M Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):29425.

PMID: 39604468 PMC: 11603054. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-80779-3.


Selective and prolonged attention to emotional scenes in humans and bonobos.

van Berlo E, Roth T, Kim Y, Kret M Proc Biol Sci. 2024; 291(2028):20240433.

PMID: 39106955 PMC: 11303022. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2024.0433.


No immediate attentional bias towards or choice bias for male secondary sexual characteristics in Bornean orang-utans (Pongo pygmaeus).

Roth T, Samara I, Perea-Garcia J, Kret M Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):12095.

PMID: 38802458 PMC: 11130206. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-62187-9.


Ape recognition of familiar human faces changed by time and COVID-19 face masks.

Murray L Heliyon. 2024; 10(7):e27876.

PMID: 38586329 PMC: 10998057. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e27876.


'Do I know you?' Categorizing individuals on the basis of familiarity in kea ().

Suwandschieff E, Mundry R, Kull K, Kreuzer L, Schwing R R Soc Open Sci. 2023; 10(6):230228.

PMID: 37351495 PMC: 10282571. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.230228.


References
1.
Phillips W, Barnes J, Mahajan N, Yamaguchi M, Santos L . 'Unwilling' versus 'unable': capuchin monkeys' (Cebus apella) understanding of human intentional action. Dev Sci. 2009; 12(6):938-45. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2009.00840.x. View

2.
Palermo R, Coltheart M . Photographs of facial expression: accuracy, response times, and ratings of intensity. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2005; 36(4):634-8. DOI: 10.3758/bf03206544. View

3.
Kret M, Muramatsu A, Matsuzawa T . Emotion processing across and within species: A comparison between humans (Homo sapiens) and chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). J Comp Psychol. 2018; 132(4):395-409. DOI: 10.1037/com0000108. View

4.
MacLeod C, Mathews A, Tata P . Attentional bias in emotional disorders. J Abnorm Psychol. 1986; 95(1):15-20. DOI: 10.1037//0021-843x.95.1.15. View

5.
Gusset M, Dick G . The global reach of zoos and aquariums in visitor numbers and conservation expenditures. Zoo Biol. 2010; 30(5):566-9. DOI: 10.1002/zoo.20369. View