Effects of Experience and Familiarity on Visual Attention and Behaviours of Bottlenose Dolphins (Tursiops Truncatus) in Presence of Humans

Overview

Journal Sci Rep

Specialty Science

Date 2024 Nov 28

PMID 39604468

Authors

Alessandro Gallo

Robert Gojceta

Martin Boye

Alban Lemasson

Martine Hausberger

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Visual attention is an intrinsic part of intra- and inter-specific interactions. Its structure (e.g. short glances vs. long gazes) depends on the species, type and expected outcome of the interaction. The outcomes of earlier repeated interactions determine the resulting valence of the relationships. Human-animal relationships rely upon species-specific cognitive abilities and attentional characteristics for associative learning and memory formation. Visual attention is crucial in cognitive processing and relationships construction, but its structure may depend on species-specific characteristics and relationships' quality. Dolphins are renowned for their cognitive abilities and in human-care settings they have regular interactions with caretakers. Dolphins' visual attention structure and laterality both differ depending on the visual stimulus to which the animal is attending (species-specific, non-biological). We hypothesized that visual attentional characteristics and associated behaviours, in a group of 9 captive bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus), would differ according to past experience and familiarity with humans. Human motionless tests showed a role of experience (time spent) in the facility on play and vocal production near humans regardless of familiarity. However, familiarity influenced dolphin presence near humans and visual laterality: they stayed longer and used their right eye more to glance at familiar humans. These findings provide new insights on how dolphins cognitively process stimuli according to familiarity and past experiences, as well as on how human - animal relationships evolve in captive settings.

References

Cousillas H, George I, Henry L, Richard J, Hausberger M . Linking social and vocal brains: could social segregation prevent a proper development of a central auditory area in a female songbird?. PLoS One. 2008; 3(5):e2194. PMC: 2386286. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0002194. View

Pougnault L, Cousillas H, Heyraud C, Huber L, Hausberger M, Henry L . Experimental Tests for Measuring Individual Attentional Characteristics in Songbirds. Animals (Basel). 2021; 11(8). PMC: 8388455. DOI: 10.3390/ani11082233. View

Scheid C, Range F, Bugnyar T . When, what, and whom to watch? Quantifying attention in ravens (Corvus corax) and jackdaws (Corvus monedula). J Comp Psychol. 2007; 121(4):380-6. DOI: 10.1037/0735-7036.121.4.380. View

Gammino B, Palacios V, Root-Gutteridge H, Reby D, Gamba M . Grey wolves (Canis lupus) discriminate between familiar and unfamiliar human voices. Anim Cogn. 2023; 26(5):1589-1600. DOI: 10.1007/s10071-023-01796-9. View

de Passille A, Rushen J, Ladewig J, Petherick C . Dairy calves' discrimination of people based on previous handling. J Anim Sci. 1996; 74(5):969-74. DOI: 10.2527/1996.745969x. View

Fureix C, Jego P, Sankey C, Hausberger M . How horses (Equus caballus) see the world: humans as significant "objects". Anim Cogn. 2009; 12(4):643-54. DOI: 10.1007/s10071-009-0223-2. View

Cousillas H, Henry L, George I, Marchesseau S, Hausberger M . Lateralization of social signal brain processing correlates with the degree of social integration in a songbird. Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1):14093. PMC: 7445294. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-70946-7. View

Johnson C, Ruiz-Mendoza C, Schoenbeck C . Conspecific "gaze following" in bottlenose dolphins. Anim Cogn. 2022; 25(5):1219-1229. PMC: 9617818. DOI: 10.1007/s10071-022-01665-x. View

Basile M, Boivin S, Boutin A, Blois-Heulin C, Hausberger M, Lemasson A . Socially dependent auditory laterality in domestic horses (Equus caballus). Anim Cogn. 2009; 12(4):611-9. DOI: 10.1007/s10071-009-0220-5. View

10.

Rochais C, Henry S, Sankey C, Nassur F, Goracka-Bruzda A, Hausberger M . Visual attention, an indicator of human-animal relationships? A study of domestic horses (Equus caballus). Front Psychol. 2014; 5:108. PMC: 3923161. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00108. View

11.

Yaman S, von Fersen L, Dehnhardt G, Gunturkun O . Visual lateralization in the bottlenose dolphin (Tursiops truncatus): evidence for a population asymmetry?. Behav Brain Res. 2003; 142(1-2):109-14. DOI: 10.1016/s0166-4328(02)00385-6. View

12.

Fink G, Halligan P, Marshall J, Frith C, Frackowiak R, Dolan R . Neural mechanisms involved in the processing of global and local aspects of hierarchically organized visual stimuli. Brain. 1997; 120 ( Pt 10):1779-91. DOI: 10.1093/brain/120.10.1779. View

13.

Yeater D, Hill H, Baus N, Farnell H, Kuczaj 2nd S . Visual laterality in belugas (Delphinapterus leucas) and Pacific white-sided dolphins (Lagenorhynchus obliquidens) when viewing familiar and unfamiliar humans. Anim Cogn. 2014; 17(6):1245-59. DOI: 10.1007/s10071-014-0756-x. View

14.

Probert R, Bastian A, Elwen S, James B, Gridley T . Vocal correlates of arousal in bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops spp.) in human care. PLoS One. 2021; 16(9):e0250913. PMC: 8409691. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250913. View

15.

Hausberger M, Stomp M, Sankey C, Brajon S, Lunel C, Henry S . Mutual interactions between cognition and welfare: The horse as an animal model. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2019; 107:540-559. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.08.022. View

16.

Rogers L . Brain Lateralization and Cognitive Capacity. Animals (Basel). 2021; 11(7). PMC: 8300231. DOI: 10.3390/ani11071996. View

17.

Bisazza A, Facchin L, Pignatti R, Vallortigara G . Lateralization of detour behaviour in poeciliid fish: the effect of species, gender and sexual motivation. Behav Brain Res. 1998; 91(1-2):157-64. DOI: 10.1016/s0166-4328(97)00114-9. View

18.

Russow L . Ethical implications of the human-animal bond in the laboratory. ILAR J. 2001; 43(1):33-7. DOI: 10.1093/ilar.43.1.33. View

19.

Leroux M, Hetem R, Hausberger M, Lemasson A . Cheetahs discriminate familiar and unfamiliar human voices. Sci Rep. 2018; 8(1):15516. PMC: 6195546. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-33971-1. View

20.

Peirce J, Leigh A, daCosta A, Kendrick K . Human face recognition in sheep: lack of configurational coding and right hemisphere advantage. Behav Processes. 2001; 55(1):13-26. DOI: 10.1016/s0376-6357(01)00158-9. View