Disentangling Perceptual Awareness from Nonconscious Processing in Rhesus Monkeys ()
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Scholars have long debated whether animals, which display impressive intelligent behaviors, are consciously aware or not. Yet, because many complex human behaviors and high-level functions can be performed without conscious awareness, it was long considered impossible to untangle whether animals are aware or just conditionally or nonconsciously behaving. Here, we developed an empirical approach to address this question. We harnessed a well-established cross-over double dissociation between nonconscious and conscious processing, in which people perform in completely opposite ways when they are aware of stimuli versus when they are not. To date, no one has explored if similar performance dissociations exist in a nonhuman species. In a series of seven experiments, we first established these signatures in humans using both known and newly developed nonverbal double-dissociation tasks and then identified similar signatures in rhesus monkeys ( These results provide robust evidence for two distinct modes of processing in nonhuman primates. This empirical approach makes it feasible to disentangle conscious visual awareness from nonconscious processing in nonhuman species; hence, it can be used to strip away ambiguity when exploring the processes governing intelligent behavior across the animal kingdom. Taken together, these results strongly support the existence of both nonconscious processing as well as functional human-like visual awareness in nonhuman animals.
Neuroscience of animal consciousness: still agnostic after all.
Gutfreund Y Front Psychol. 2024; 15:1456403.
PMID: 39444826 PMC: 11496166. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1456403.
Short-term auditory priming in freely-moving mice.
Sivroni S, Sloin H, Stark E iScience. 2023; 26(10):107847.
PMID: 37736050 PMC: 10509352. DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.107847.
No Evidence for Biased Attention Towards Emotional Scenes in Bornean Orangutans ().
Lameris D, van Berlo E, Roth T, Kret M Affect Sci. 2022; 3(4):772-782.
PMID: 36519144 PMC: 9743850. DOI: 10.1007/s42761-022-00158-x.
Why the Epistemic Objection Against Using Sentience as Criterion of Moral Status is Flawed.
Dung L Sci Eng Ethics. 2022; 28(6):51.
PMID: 36305975 PMC: 9616780. DOI: 10.1007/s11948-022-00408-y.
Ehret G, Romand R Front Syst Neurosci. 2022; 16:941534.
PMID: 35910003 PMC: 9331465. DOI: 10.3389/fnsys.2022.941534.