» Articles » PMID: 35377843

Synchronization of RF Data in Ultrasound Open Platforms (UOPs) for High-Accuracy and High-Resolution Photoacoustic Tomography Using the "Scissors" Programming Method

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Synchronization is important for photoacoustic (PA) tomography, but some fixed delays between the data acquisition (DAQ) and the light pulse are a common problem degrading imaging quality. Here, we present a simple yet versatile method named "Scissors" to help synchronize ultrasound open platforms (UOPs) for PA imaging. Scissors is a programed function that can cut or add a fixed delay to radio frequency (RF) data and, thus, synchronize it before reconstruction. Scissors applies the programmable metric of UOPs and has several advantages. It is compatible with many setups regardless of the synchronization methods, light sources, transducers, and delays. The synchronization is adjustable in steps reciprocal to the UOPs' sampling rate (20-ns step with a 50-MHz sampling rate). Scissors works in real-time PA imaging, and no extra hardware is needed. We programed Scissors in Vantage UOP (Verasonics, Inc., Kirkland, WA, USA) and then imaged two 30- [Formula: see text] nichrome wires with a 20.2-MHz central frequency transducer. The PA image was severely distorted by an 828-ns delay; over 90% delay was caused by our Q -switch laser. The axial and lateral resolutions are 112 and [Formula: see text], respectively, after using Scissors. We imaged a human finger in vivo, and the imaging quality is tremendously improved after solving the 828-ns delay by using Scissors.

Citing Articles

Posterior photoacoustic/ultrasound imaging of the periodontal pocket with a compact intraoral transducer.

Fu L, Khazaeinezhad R, Hariri A, Qi B, Chen C, Jokerst J Photoacoustics. 2022; 28:100408.

PMID: 36204181 PMC: 9530592. DOI: 10.1016/j.pacs.2022.100408.


Interleave-sampled photoacoustic imaging: a doubled and equivalent sampling rate for high-frequency imaging.

Fu L, Jokerst J Opt Lett. 2022; 47(14):3503-3506.

PMID: 35838713 PMC: 10100578. DOI: 10.1364/OL.464293.

References
1.
Li M, Zhang H, Maslov K, Stoica G, Wang L . Improved in vivo photoacoustic microscopy based on a virtual-detector concept. Opt Lett. 2006; 31(4):474-6. DOI: 10.1364/ol.31.000474. View

2.
Arconada-Alvarez S, Lemaster J, Wang J, Jokerst J . The development and characterization of a novel yet simple 3D printed tool to facilitate phantom imaging of photoacoustic contrast agents. Photoacoustics. 2017; 5:17-24. PMC: 5314822. DOI: 10.1016/j.pacs.2017.02.001. View

3.
Lin L, Hu P, Shi J, Appleton C, Maslov K, Li L . Single-breath-hold photoacoustic computed tomography of the breast. Nat Commun. 2018; 9(1):2352. PMC: 6003984. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-04576-z. View

4.
Yoon H, Emelianov S . Combined Multiwavelength Photoacoustic and Plane-Wave Ultrasound Imaging for Probing Dynamic Phase-Change Contrast Agents. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2018; 66(2):595-598. PMC: 6365772. DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2018.2849077. View

5.
Na S, Russin J, Lin L, Yuan X, Hu P, Jann K . Massively parallel functional photoacoustic computed tomography of the human brain. Nat Biomed Eng. 2021; 6(5):584-592. PMC: 8630100. DOI: 10.1038/s41551-021-00735-8. View