» Articles » PMID: 29993364

Ultrasound Open Platforms for Next-Generation Imaging Technique Development

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Open platform (OP) ultrasound systems are aimed primarily at the research community. They have been at the forefront of the development of synthetic aperture, plane wave, shear wave elastography, and vector flow imaging. Such platforms are driven by a need for broad flexibility of parameters that are normally preset or fixed within clinical scanners. OP ultrasound scanners are defined to have three key features including customization of the transmit waveform, access to the prebeamformed receive data, and the ability to implement real-time imaging. In this paper, a formative discussion is given on the development of OPs from both the research community and the commercial sector. Both software- and hardware-based architectures are considered, and their specifications are compared in terms of resources and programmability. Software-based platforms capable of real-time beamforming generally make use of scalable graphics processing unit architectures, whereas a common feature of hardware-based platforms is the use of field-programmable gate array and digital signal processor devices to provide additional on-board processing capacity. OPs with extended number of channels (>256) are also discussed in relation to their role in supporting 3-D imaging technique development. With the increasing maturity of OP ultrasound scanners, the pace of advancement in ultrasound imaging algorithms is poised to be accelerated.

Citing Articles

Photoacoustic imaging on its way toward clinical utility: a tutorial review focusing on practical application in medicine.

Riksen J, Nikolaev A, van Soest G J Biomed Opt. 2023; 28(12):121205.

PMID: 37304059 PMC: 10249868. DOI: 10.1117/1.JBO.28.12.121205.


Lung Ultrasound Artifacts Interpreted as Pathology Footprints.

Demi M, Soldati G, Ramalli A Diagnostics (Basel). 2023; 13(6).

PMID: 36980450 PMC: 10047655. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13061139.


Multi-Sensing Techniques with Ultrasound for Musculoskeletal Assessment: A Review.

Oliveira J, Abreu de Souza M, Assef A, Maia J Sensors (Basel). 2022; 22(23).

PMID: 36501933 PMC: 9740760. DOI: 10.3390/s22239232.


Interleave-sampled photoacoustic imaging: a doubled and equivalent sampling rate for high-frequency imaging.

Fu L, Jokerst J Opt Lett. 2022; 47(14):3503-3506.

PMID: 35838713 PMC: 10100578. DOI: 10.1364/OL.464293.


Synchronization of RF Data in Ultrasound Open Platforms (UOPs) for High-Accuracy and High-Resolution Photoacoustic Tomography Using the "Scissors" Programming Method.

Fu L, Jin Z, Qi B, Yim W, Wu Z, He T IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2022; 69(6):1994-2000.

PMID: 35377843 PMC: 9149135. DOI: 10.1109/TUFFC.2022.3164371.


References
1.
York G, Kim Y . Ultrasound processing and computing: review and future directions. Annu Rev Biomed Eng. 2001; 1:559-88. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.bioeng.1.1.559. View

2.
Boni E, Bassi L, Dallai A, Guidi F, Ramalli A, Ricci S . A reconfigurable and programmable FPGA-based system for nonstandard ultrasound methods. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2012; 59(7):1378-85. DOI: 10.1109/TUFFC.2012.2338. View

3.
Arendt Jensen J, Nikolov S, Yu A, Garcia D . Ultrasound Vector Flow Imaging-Part II: Parallel Systems. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2016; 63(11):1722-1732. DOI: 10.1109/TUFFC.2016.2598180. View

4.
Udesen J, Gran F, Hansen K, Arendt Jensen J, Thomsen C, Nielsen M . High frame-rate blood vector velocity imaging using plane waves: simulations and preliminary experiments. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2008; 55(8):1729-43. DOI: 10.1109/TUFFC.2008.858. View

5.
Cowell D, Smith P, Freear S . Phase-inversion-based selective harmonic elimination (PI-SHE) in multi-level switched-mode tone- and frequency-modulated excitation. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control. 2014; 60(6):1084-97. DOI: 10.1109/TUFFC.2013.2672. View