» Articles » PMID: 35265877

A Comprehensive Artificial Intelligence-enabled Electrocardiogram Interpretation Program

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Automated computerized electrocardiogram (ECG) interpretation algorithms are designed to enhance physician ECG interpretation, minimize medical error, and expedite clinical workflow. However, the performance of current computer algorithms is notoriously inconsistent. We aimed to develop and validate an artificial intelligence-enabled ECG (AI-ECG) algorithm capable of comprehensive 12-lead ECG interpretation with accuracy comparable to practicing cardiologists.

Methods: We developed an AI-ECG algorithm using a convolutional neural network as a multilabel classifier capable of assessing 66 discrete, structured diagnostic ECG codes using the cardiologist's final annotation as the gold-standard interpretation. We included 2,499,522 ECGs from 720,978 patients ≥18 years of age with a standard 12-lead ECG obtained at the Mayo Clinic ECG laboratory between 1993 and 2017. The total sample was randomly divided into training (n = 1,749,654), validation (n = 249,951), and testing (n = 499,917) datasets with a similar distribution of codes. We compared the AI-ECG algorithm's performance to the cardiologist's interpretation in the testing dataset using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and precision recall (PR) curves.

Results: The model performed well for various rhythm, conduction, ischemia, waveform morphology, and secondary diagnoses codes with an area under the ROC curve of ≥0.98 for 62 of the 66 codes. PR metrics were used to assess model performance accounting for category imbalance and demonstrated a sensitivity ≥95% for all codes.

Conclusions: An AI-ECG algorithm demonstrates high diagnostic performance in comparison to reference cardiologist interpretation of a standard 12-lead ECG. The use of AI-ECG reading tools may permit scalability as ECG acquisition becomes more ubiquitous.

Citing Articles

Machine-Learning for Phenotyping and Prognostication of Myocardial Infarction and Injury in Suspected Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Khan E, Lambrakis K, Liao Z, Gerlach J, Briffa T, Cullen L JACC Adv. 2024; 3(9):101011.

PMID: 39372465 PMC: 11450946. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2024.101011.


Prospects for artificial intelligence-enhanced electrocardiogram as a unified screening tool for cardiac and non-cardiac conditions: an explorative study in emergency care.

Strodthoff N, Lopez Alcaraz J, Haverkamp W Eur Heart J Digit Health. 2024; 5(4):454-460.

PMID: 39081937 PMC: 11284007. DOI: 10.1093/ehjdh/ztae039.


Performance of Prehospital ECG and Impact on Prehospital Service Time: Comparison between EMT-II and EMT-P Teams.

Wu Z, Lee B, Chen Y, Tsai M, Chiu C, Chien Y Acta Cardiol Sin. 2024; 40(4):412-420.

PMID: 39045376 PMC: 11261359. DOI: 10.6515/ACS.202407_40(4).20240401B.


Clinical Applications, Methodology, and Scientific Reporting of Electrocardiogram Deep-Learning Models: A Systematic Review.

Avula V, Wu K, Carrick R JACC Adv. 2024; 2(10).

PMID: 38288263 PMC: 10824530. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2023.100686.


Automatic triage of twelve-lead electrocardiograms using deep convolutional neural networks: a first implementation study.

van de Leur R, van Sleuwen M, Zwetsloot P, van der Harst P, Doevendans P, Hassink R Eur Heart J Digit Health. 2024; 5(1):89-96.

PMID: 38264701 PMC: 10802816. DOI: 10.1093/ehjdh/ztad070.


References
1.
LeCun Y, Bengio Y, Hinton G . Deep learning. Nature. 2015; 521(7553):436-44. DOI: 10.1038/nature14539. View

2.
Esteva A, Kuprel B, Novoa R, Ko J, Swetter S, Blau H . Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks. Nature. 2017; 542(7639):115-118. PMC: 8382232. DOI: 10.1038/nature21056. View

3.
Attia Z, Kapa S, Lopez-Jimenez F, McKie P, Ladewig D, Satam G . Screening for cardiac contractile dysfunction using an artificial intelligence-enabled electrocardiogram. Nat Med. 2019; 25(1):70-74. DOI: 10.1038/s41591-018-0240-2. View

4.
Mawri S, Michaels A, Gibbs J, Shah S, Rao S, Kugelmass A . The Comparison of Physician to Computer Interpreted Electrocardiograms on ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction Door-to-balloon Times. Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2016; 15(1):22-5. DOI: 10.1097/HPC.0000000000000067. View

5.
Martinez-Losas P, Higueras J, Gomez-Polo J, Brabyn P, Ferrer J, Canadas V . The influence of computerized interpretation of an electrocardiogram reading. Am J Emerg Med. 2016; 34(10):2031-2032. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2016.07.029. View