» Articles » PMID: 35299975

Remote Cardiac Rhythm Monitoring in the Era of Smart Wearables: Present Assets and Future Perspectives

Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Remote monitoring and control of heart function are of primary importance for patient evaluation and management, especially in the modern era of precision medicine and personalized approach. Breaking technological developments have brought to the frontline a variety of smart wearable devices, such as smartwatches, chest patches/straps, or sensors integrated into clothing and footwear, which allow continuous and real-time recording of heart rate, facilitating the detection of cardiac arrhythmias. However, there is great diversity and significant differences in the type and quality of the information they provide, thus impairing their integration into daily clinical practice and the relevant familiarization of practicing physicians. This review will summarize the different types and dominant functions of cardiac smart wearables available in the market. Furthermore, we report the devices certified by official American and/or European authorities and the respective sources of evidence. Finally, we comment pertinent limitations and caveats as well as the potential answers that flow from the latest technological achievements and future perspectives.

Citing Articles

Bridging the Gaps in Atrial Fibrillation Management in the Emergency Department.

Wang B J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2025; 12(1).

PMID: 39852298 PMC: 11766356. DOI: 10.3390/jcdd12010020.


Impact of Wearable Technology on Heart Failure Management.

Jafari N, Yousefi Ghalati S, Shahabi Raberi V, Moalemi S, Amin A Galen Med J. 2024; 13:e3469.

PMID: 39483862 PMC: 11525106. DOI: 10.31661/gmj.v13i.3469.


A New Remote Monitoring System: Evaluation of the Efficiency and Accuracy of the Smart Emergency Medical System-Health Internet of Things Device.

Hedayati Goudarzi M, Zare Marzouni H, Tarkhan F, Bijani A, Babagoli M, Shadifar A Galen Med J. 2024; 13:e3376.

PMID: 39474584 PMC: 11521570. DOI: 10.31661/gmj.v13i.3376.


Standardized assessment of evidence supporting the adoption of mobile health solutions: A Clinical Consensus Statement of the ESC Regulatory Affairs Committee: Developed in collaboration with the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA), the....

Caiani E, Kemps H, Hoogendoorn P, Asteggiano R, Bohm A, Borregaard B Eur Heart J Digit Health. 2024; 5(5):509-523.

PMID: 39318699 PMC: 11417493. DOI: 10.1093/ehjdh/ztae042.


Wearable Sensors in Other Medical Domains with Application Potential for Orthopedic Trauma Surgery-A Narrative Review.

Vogel C, Grimm B, Marmor M, Sivananthan S, Richter P, Yarboro S J Clin Med. 2024; 13(11).

PMID: 38892844 PMC: 11172495. DOI: 10.3390/jcm13113134.


References
1.
Plews D, Scott B, Altini M, Wood M, Kilding A, Laursen P . Comparison of Heart-Rate-Variability Recording With Smartphone Photoplethysmography, Polar H7 Chest Strap, and Electrocardiography. Int J Sports Physiol Perform. 2017; 12(10):1324-1328. DOI: 10.1123/ijspp.2016-0668. View

2.
Kaura A, Sztriha L, Chan F, Aeron-Thomas J, Gall N, Piechowski-Jozwiak B . Early prolonged ambulatory cardiac monitoring in stroke (EPACS): an open-label randomised controlled trial. Eur J Med Res. 2019; 24(1):25. PMC: 6659210. DOI: 10.1186/s40001-019-0383-8. View

3.
Maines M, Zorzi A, Tomasi G, Angheben C, Catanzariti D, Piffer L . Clinical impact, safety, and accuracy of the remotely monitored implantable loop recorder Medtronic Reveal LINQTM. Europace. 2017; 20(6):1050-1057. DOI: 10.1093/europace/eux187. View

4.
Liu Y, Zhu S, Wang G, Ye F, Li P . Validity and reliability of multiparameter physiological measurements recorded by the Equivital LifeMonitor during activities of various intensities. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2012; 10(2):78-85. DOI: 10.1080/15459624.2012.747404. View

5.
Koshy A, Sajeev J, Nerlekar N, Brown A, Rajakariar K, Zureik M . Smart watches for heart rate assessment in atrial arrhythmias. Int J Cardiol. 2018; 266:124-127. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.02.073. View