» Articles » PMID: 35094007

Walking Improvement in Chronic Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury with Exoskeleton Robotic Training (WISE): a Randomized Controlled Trial

Abstract

Study Design: Clinical trial.

Objective: To demonstrate that a 12-week exoskeleton-based robotic gait training regimen can lead to a clinically meaningful improvement in independent gait speed, in community-dwelling participants with chronic incomplete spinal cord injury (iSCI).

Setting: Outpatient rehabilitation or research institute.

Methods: Multi-site (United States), randomized, controlled trial, comparing exoskeleton gait training (12 weeks, 36 sessions) with standard gait training or no gait training (2:2:1 randomization) in chronic iSCI (>1 year post injury, AIS-C, and D), with residual stepping ability. The primary outcome measure was change in robot-independent gait speed (10-meter walk test, 10MWT) post 12-week intervention. Secondary outcomes included: Timed-Up-and-Go (TUG), 6-min walk test (6MWT), Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury (WISCI-II) (assistance and devices), and treating therapist NASA-Task Load Index.

Results: Twenty-five participants completed the assessments and training as assigned (9 Ekso, 10 Active Control, 6 Passive Control). Mean change in gait speed at the primary endpoint was not statistically significant. The proportion of participants with improvement in clinical ambulation category from home to community speed post-intervention was greatest in the Ekso group (>1/2 Ekso, 1/3 Active Control, 0 Passive Control, p < 0.05). Improvements in secondary outcome measures were not significant.

Conclusions: Twelve weeks of exoskeleton robotic training in chronic SCI participants with independent stepping ability at baseline can improve clinical ambulatory status. Improvements in raw gait speed were not statistically significant at the group level, which may guide future trials for participant inclusion criteria. While generally safe and tolerable, larger gains in ambulation might be associated with higher risk for non-serious adverse events.

Citing Articles

Scientific Advances in Neural Regeneration After Spinal Cord Injury.

Gartit M, Noumairi M, Rhoul A, Mahla H, El Anbari Y, El Oumri A Cureus. 2025; 17(2):e78630.

PMID: 40062077 PMC: 11890103. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.78630.


Acceptability of Overground Wearable Powered Exoskeletons for People with Spinal Cord Injury: A Multicenter Qualitative Study.

Fortin-Bedard N, Pellichero A, Leplaideur S, Delebecque M, Charette C, Allegre W Biomimetics (Basel). 2025; 10(1).

PMID: 39851752 PMC: 11761949. DOI: 10.3390/biomimetics10010036.


Comprehensive multi-metric analysis of user experience and performance in adaptive and non-adaptive lower-limb exoskeletons.

Supapitanon K, Patathong T, Akkawutvanich C, Srisuchinnawong A, Ketrungsri W, Manoonpong P PLoS One. 2025; 20(1):e0313593.

PMID: 39787128 PMC: 11717227. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313593.


The use of exoskeleton robotic training on lower extremity function in spinal cord injuries: A systematic review.

Moriarty B, Jacob T, Sadlowski M, Fowler M, Rowan C, Chavarria J J Orthop. 2024; 65:1-7.

PMID: 39713557 PMC: 11656084. DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2024.10.036.


Response: Use of the WISCI-II score in assessing outcome of intensive robot-assisted gait training in spinal cord injury.

Edwards D, Jayaraman A Spinal Cord. 2024; 62(12):675.

PMID: 39468258 PMC: 11621012. DOI: 10.1038/s41393-024-01044-y.


References
1.
Harkema S, Schmidt-Read M, Lorenz D, Edgerton V, Behrman A . Balance and ambulation improvements in individuals with chronic incomplete spinal cord injury using locomotor training-based rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011; 93(9):1508-17. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.01.024. View

2.
Winchester P, Smith P, Foreman N, Mosby J, Pacheco F, Querry R . A prediction model for determining over ground walking speed after locomotor training in persons with motor incomplete spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med. 2009; 32(1):63-71. PMC: 2647503. DOI: 10.1080/10790268.2009.11760754. View

3.
van Hedel H, Dietz V . Rehabilitation of locomotion after spinal cord injury. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2010; 28(1):123-34. DOI: 10.3233/RNN-2010-0508. View

4.
Pinto D, Garnier M, Barbas J, Chang S, Charlifue S, Field-Fote E . Budget impact analysis of robotic exoskeleton use for locomotor training following spinal cord injury in four SCI Model Systems. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2020; 17(1):4. PMC: 6954546. DOI: 10.1186/s12984-019-0639-0. View

5.
Campo M, Weiser S, Koenig K, Nordin M . Work-related musculoskeletal disorders in physical therapists: a prospective cohort study with 1-year follow-up. Phys Ther. 2008; 88(5):608-19. PMC: 2390722. DOI: 10.2522/ptj.20070127. View