» Articles » PMID: 37391401

Intensity of Overground Robotic Exoskeleton Training in Two Persons with Motor-complete Tetraplegia: a Case Series

Overview
Specialty Neurology
Date 2023 Jun 30
PMID 37391401
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Participation in moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity (MVPA) is recommended to reduce chronic disease risk in individuals with tetraplegia. Assessing exercise intensity using traditional methods, such as heart rate, may be inaccurate in patients with motor-complete tetraplegia due to autonomic and neuromuscular dysfunction. Direct gas analysis may be more accurate. Overground robotic exoskeleton (ORE) training can be physiologically demanding. Yet, its utility as an aerobic exercise modality to facilitate MVPA in patients with chronic and acute motor-complete tetraplegia has not been explored.

Case Presentation: We present the results of two male participants with motor-complete tetraplegia who completed one ORE exercise session while intensity was assessed using a portable metabolic system and expressed in metabolic equivalents (METs). METs were calculated using a rolling 30-s average with 1 MET defined as 2.7 mL/kg/min and MVPA defined as MET ≥ 3.0. Participant A (28-year-old) with a chronic (12 yrs) spinal cord injury (C5, AIS A) completed 37.4 min of ORE exercise (28.9 min walking) achieving 1047 steps. Peak METs were 3.4 (average 2.3) with 3% of walk time spent in MVPA. Participant B (21-year-old) with an acute (2 months) spinal cord injury (C4, AIS A) completed 42.3 min of ORE exercise (40.5 min walking) achieving 1023 steps. Peak METs were 3.2 (average 2.6) with 12% of walk time spent in MVPA. Both participants tolerated activity well without observed adverse responses to activity.

Discussion: ORE exercise may be an effective aerobic exercise modality that may increase participation in physical activity in patients with motor-complete tetraplegia.

Citing Articles

Lower-Limb Exoskeletons for Gait Training in Parkinson's Disease: The State of the Art and Future Perspectives.

Fortunati M, Febbi M, Negro M, Gennaro F, DAntona G, Crisafulli O Healthcare (Basel). 2024; 12(16).

PMID: 39201194 PMC: 11353983. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12161636.

References
1.
Ravensbergen H, Groot S, Post M, Slootman H, van der Woude L, Claydon V . Cardiovascular function after spinal cord injury: prevalence and progression of dysfunction during inpatient rehabilitation and 5 years following discharge. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2013; 28(3):219-29. DOI: 10.1177/1545968313504542. View

2.
Gorgey A, Wade R, Sumrell R, Villadelgado L, Khalil R, Lavis T . Exoskeleton Training May Improve Level of Physical Activity After Spinal Cord Injury: A Case Series. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2018; 23(3):245-255. PMC: 5562032. DOI: 10.1310/sci16-00025. View

3.
Gagnon D, Escalona M, Vermette M, Carvalho L, Karelis A, Duclos C . Locomotor training using an overground robotic exoskeleton in long-term manual wheelchair users with a chronic spinal cord injury living in the community: Lessons learned from a feasibility study in terms of recruitment, attendance, learnability,.... J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2018; 15(1):12. PMC: 5831695. DOI: 10.1186/s12984-018-0354-2. View

4.
Shea J, Shay B, Cowley K . The ability of heart rate or perceived exertion to predict oxygen uptake varies across exercise modes in persons with tetraplegia. Spinal Cord. 2021; 59(12):1247-1255. DOI: 10.1038/s41393-021-00670-0. View

5.
Van Straaten M, Cloud B, Zhao K, Fortune E, Morrow M . Maintaining Shoulder Health After Spinal Cord Injury: A Guide to Understanding Treatments for Shoulder Pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017; 98(5):1061-1063. PMC: 5532812. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.10.005. View