» Articles » PMID: 29105657

Gait Training After Spinal Cord Injury: Safety, Feasibility and Gait Function Following 8 Weeks of Training with the Exoskeletons from Ekso Bionics

Abstract

Study Design: Prospective quasi-experimental study, pre- and post-design.

Objectives: Assess safety, feasibility, training characteristics and changes in gait function for persons with spinal cord injury (SCI) using the robotic exoskeletons from Ekso Bionics.

Setting: Nine European rehabilitation centres.

Methods: Robotic exoskeleton gait training, three times weekly over 8 weeks. Time upright, time walking and steps in the device (training characteristics) were recorded longitudinally. Gait and neurological function were measured by 10 Metre Walk Test (10 MWT), Timed Up and Go (TUG), Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury (WISCI) II and Lower Extremity Motor Score (LEMS).

Results: Fifty-two participants completed the training protocol. Median age: 35.8 years (IQR 27.5-52.5), men/women: N = 36/16, neurological level of injury: C1-L2 and severity: AIS A-D (American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale). Time since injury (TSI) < 1 year, N = 25; > 1 year, N = 27. No serious adverse events occurred. Three participants dropped out following ankle swelling (overuse injury). Four participants sustained a Category II pressure ulcer at contact points with the device but completed the study and skin normalized. Training characteristics increased significantly for all subgroups. The number of participants with TSI < 1 year and gait function increased from 20 to 56% (P = 0.004) and 10MWT, TUG, BBS and LEMS results improved (P < 0.05). The number of participants with TSI > 1 year and gait function, increased from 41 to 44% and TUG and BBS results improved (P < 0.05).

Conclusions: Exoskeleton training was generally safe and feasible in a heterogeneous sample of persons with SCI. Results indicate potential benefits on gait function and balance.

Citing Articles

Scientific Advances in Neural Regeneration After Spinal Cord Injury.

Gartit M, Noumairi M, Rhoul A, Mahla H, El Anbari Y, El Oumri A Cureus. 2025; 17(2):e78630.

PMID: 40062077 PMC: 11890103. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.78630.


Comprehensive multi-metric analysis of user experience and performance in adaptive and non-adaptive lower-limb exoskeletons.

Supapitanon K, Patathong T, Akkawutvanich C, Srisuchinnawong A, Ketrungsri W, Manoonpong P PLoS One. 2025; 20(1):e0313593.

PMID: 39787128 PMC: 11717227. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313593.


Usability and Safety of the ATLAS 2030 Robotic Gait Device in Children with Cerebral Palsy and Spinal Muscular Atrophy.

Cumplido-Trasmonte C, Barquin-Santos E, Aneiros-Tarancon F, Plaza-Flores A, Espinosa-Garcia S, Fernandez R Children (Basel). 2025; 11(12.

PMID: 39767930 PMC: 11674413. DOI: 10.3390/children11121500.


Interlimb and Intralimb Synergy Modeling for Lower Limb Assistive Devices: Modeling Methods and Feature Selection.

Liang F, Mo L, Sun Y, Guo C, Gao F, Liao W Cyborg Bionic Syst. 2024; 5:0122.

PMID: 39691661 PMC: 11651417. DOI: 10.34133/cbsystems.0122.


User-centered design of a personal-use exoskeleton: a clinical investigation on the feasibility and usability of the ABLE Exoskeleton device for individuals with spinal cord injury to perform skills for home and community environments.

Nadorf F, Wright M, Lopez-Matas H, Porras E, Carnicero-Carmona A, Hensel C Front Neurosci. 2024; 18:1437358.

PMID: 39391753 PMC: 11464447. DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2024.1437358.


References
1.
Waters R, Adkins R, Yakura J, Sie I . Motor and sensory recovery following incomplete tetraplegia. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994; 75(3):306-11. DOI: 10.1016/0003-9993(94)90034-5. View

2.
Lam T, Noonan V, Eng J . A systematic review of functional ambulation outcome measures in spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2007; 46(4):246-54. PMC: 3095631. DOI: 10.1038/sj.sc.3102134. View

3.
Aach M, Cruciger O, Sczesny-Kaiser M, Hoffken O, Meindl R, Tegenthoff M . Voluntary driven exoskeleton as a new tool for rehabilitation in chronic spinal cord injury: a pilot study. Spine J. 2014; 14(12):2847-53. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2014.03.042. View

4.
van Kammen K, Boonstra A, Reinders-Messelink H, den Otter R . The combined effects of body weight support and gait speed on gait related muscle activity: a comparison between walking in the Lokomat exoskeleton and regular treadmill walking. PLoS One. 2014; 9(9):e107323. PMC: 4167325. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0107323. View

5.
Kirshblum S, Priebe M, Ho C, Scelza W, Chiodo A, Wuermser L . Spinal cord injury medicine. 3. Rehabilitation phase after acute spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007; 88(3 Suppl 1):S62-70. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2006.12.003. View