» Articles » PMID: 36683024

The Efficacy of Gait Rehabilitations for the Treatment of Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury: a Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2023 Jan 22
PMID 36683024
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Recent pieces of evidence about the efficacy of gait rehabilitation for incomplete spinal cord injury remain unclear. We aimed to estimate the treatment effect and find the best gait rehabilitation to regain velocity, distance, and Walking Index Spinal Cord Injury (WISCI) among incomplete spinal cord injury patients.

Method: PubMed and Scopus databases were searched from inception to October 2022. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included in comparison with any of the following: conventional physical therapy, treadmill, functional electrical stimulation and robotic-assisted gait training, and reported at least one outcome. Two reviewers independently selected the studies and extracted the data. Meta-analysis was performed using random-effects or fixed-effect model according to the heterogeneity. Network meta-analysis (NMA) was indirectly compared with all interventions and reported as pooled unstandardized mean difference (USMD) and 95% confidence interval (CI). Surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) was calculated to identify the best intervention.

Results: We included 17 RCTs (709 participants) with the mean age of 43.9 years. Acute-phase robotic-assisted gait training significantly improved the velocity (USMD 0.1 m/s, 95% CI 0.05, 0.14), distance (USMD 64.75 m, 95% CI 27.24, 102.27), and WISCI (USMD 3.28, 95% CI 0.12, 6.45) compared to conventional physical therapy. In NMA, functional electrical stimulation had the highest probability of being the best intervention for velocity (66.6%, SUCRA 82.1) and distance (39.7%, SUCRA 67.4), followed by treadmill, functional electrical stimulation plus treadmill, robotic-assisted gait training, and conventional physical therapy, respectively.

Conclusion: Functional electrical stimulation seems to be the best treatment to improve walking velocity and distance for incomplete spinal cord injury patients. However, a large-scale RCT is required to study the adverse events of these interventions.

Trial Registration: PROSPERO number CRD42019145797.

Citing Articles

Automatic Assist Level Adjustment Function of a Gait Exercise Rehabilitation Robot with Functional Electrical Stimulation for Spinal Cord Injury: Insights from Clinical Trials.

Kimura R, Sato T, Kasukawa Y, Kudo D, Iwami T, Miyakoshi N Biomimetics (Basel). 2024; 9(10).

PMID: 39451827 PMC: 11506815. DOI: 10.3390/biomimetics9100621.


Global Research Trends on Gait Rehabilitation in Individuals With Spinal Cord Injury- A Bibliometric Analysis.

Phadke V, Sharma R, Sharma N, Mitra S Global Spine J. 2024; 14(8):2408-2419.

PMID: 38548623 PMC: 11529084. DOI: 10.1177/21925682241243074.


The Orthotic Effects of Different Functional Electrical Stimulation Protocols on Walking Performance in Individuals with Incomplete Spinal Cord Injury: A Case Series.

Tajali S, Iwasa S, Sin V, Atputharaj S, Desai Kapadia N, Musselman K Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2024; 29(Suppl):142-152.

PMID: 38174132 PMC: 10759841. DOI: 10.46292/sci23-00021S.


Effects of a Gait Training Program on Spinal Cord Injury Patients: A Single-Group Prospective Cohort Study.

Echemendia Del Valle A, Bender Del Busto J, Sentmanat Belison A, Cuenca-Zaldivar J, Martinez-Pozas O, Martinez-Lozano P J Clin Med. 2023; 12(23).

PMID: 38068259 PMC: 10707500. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12237208.


Management of Cervical Spinal Cord Injury without Major Bone Injury in Adults.

Nakajima H, Honjoh K, Watanabe S, Takahashi A, Kubota A, Matsumine A J Clin Med. 2023; 12(21).

PMID: 37959260 PMC: 10650636. DOI: 10.3390/jcm12216795.

References
1.
Mao Y, Lo W, Lin Q, Li L, Xiao X, Raghavan P . The Effect of Body Weight Support Treadmill Training on Gait Recovery, Proximal Lower Limb Motor Pattern, and Balance in Patients with Subacute Stroke. Biomed Res Int. 2015; 2015:175719. PMC: 4663281. DOI: 10.1155/2015/175719. View

2.
Esclarin-Ruz A, Alcobendas-Maestro M, Casado-Lopez R, Perez-Mateos G, Florido-Sanchez M, Gonzalez-Valdizan E . A comparison of robotic walking therapy and conventional walking therapy in individuals with upper versus lower motor neuron lesions: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014; 95(6):1023-31. DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.12.017. View

3.
Alexeeva N, Sames C, Jacobs P, Hobday L, DiStasio M, Mitchell S . Comparison of training methods to improve walking in persons with chronic spinal cord injury: a randomized clinical trial. J Spinal Cord Med. 2011; 34(4):362-79. PMC: 3152808. DOI: 10.1179/2045772311Y.0000000018. View

4.
Nightingale E, Raymond J, Middleton J, Crosbie J, Davis G . Benefits of FES gait in a spinal cord injured population. Spinal Cord. 2007; 45(10):646-57. DOI: 10.1038/sj.sc.3102101. View

5.
Dobkin B, Barbeau H, Deforge D, Ditunno J, Elashoff R, Apple D . The evolution of walking-related outcomes over the first 12 weeks of rehabilitation for incomplete traumatic spinal cord injury: the multicenter randomized Spinal Cord Injury Locomotor Trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2006; 21(1):25-35. PMC: 4110057. DOI: 10.1177/1545968306295556. View