What is the "safe Zone" for Transition of Coronal Alignment from Systematic to a More Personalised One in Total Knee Arthroplasty? A Systematic Review

Overview

Journal Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc

Publisher Wiley

Specialties Emergency Medicine
General Surgery
Orthopedics

Date 2022 Jan 1

PMID 34973095

Citations 25

Authors

Benjamin L Schelker

Andrej M Nowakowski

Michael T Hirschmann

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Purpose: In total knee arthroplasty (TKA), implants are increasingly aligned based on emerging patient-specific alignment strategies, such as unrestricted kinematic alignment (KA), according to their constitutional limb alignment (phenotype alignment), which results in a large proportion of patients having a hip-knee angle (HKA) outside the safe range of ± 3° to 180° traditionally considered in the mechanical alignment strategy. The aim of this systematic review is to investigate whether alignment outside the safe zone of ± 3° is associated with a higher revision rate and worse clinical outcome than alignment within this range.

Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane and World of Science, with search terms including synonyms and plurals for "total knee arthroplasty", "alignment", "outlier", "malalignment", "implant survival" and "outcome". Five studies were identified with a total number of 927 patients and 952 implants. The Oxford Knee Score (OKS) and the WOMAC were used to evaluate the clinical outcome. The follow-up period was between 6 months and 10 years.

Results: According to HKA 533 knees were aligned within ± 3°, 47 (8.8%) were varus outliers and 121 (22.7%) were valgus outliers. No significant differences in clinical outcomes were found between implants positioned within ± 3° and varus and valgus outliers. Likewise, no significant differences were found regarding revision rates and implant survival.

Conclusion: The universal use of the "safe zone" of ± 3° derived from the mechanical alignment strategy is hardly applicable to modern personalised alignment strategies in the light of current literature. However, given the conflicting evidence in the literature on the risks of higher revision rates and poorer clinical outcomes especially with greater tibial component deviation, the lack of data on the outcomes of more extreme alignments, and regarding the use of implants for KA TKA that are actually designed for mechanical alignment, there is an urgent need for research to define eventual evidence-based thresholds for new patient-specific alignment strategies, not only for HKA but also for FMA and TMA, also taking into account the preoperative phenotype and implant design. It is of utmost clinical relevance for the application of modern alignment strategies to know which native phenotypes may be reproduced with a TKA.

Level Of Evidence: IV.

Citing Articles

Preoperative difference between 2D and 3D planning correlates with difference between planned and achieved surgical correction in patient-specific instrumented total knee arthroplasty.

Pfluger P, Pedrazzini A, Jud L, Vlachopoulos L, Hodel S, Fucentese S J Exp Orthop. 2024; 12(1):e70128.

PMID: 39737426 PMC: 11683782. DOI: 10.1002/jeo2.70128.

AI may enable robots to make a clinical impact in total knee arthroplasty, where navigation has not!.

Hirschmann M, von Eisenhart-Rothe R, Graichen H, Zaffagnini S J Exp Orthop. 2024; 11(4):e70061.

PMID: 39429889 PMC: 11489858. DOI: 10.1002/jeo2.70061.

Reliability and validity of patient-reported outcome measures in assessing knee osteoarthritis in the Chinese population: A systematic review.

Ren J, Lu H, Gao H, Zhang X, Zhang Y, Li J Heliyon. 2024; 10(18):e36645.

PMID: 39381238 PMC: 11459052. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e36645.

Efficiency assessment of intelligent patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

Liao G, Duoji J, Mu L, Zhang Y, Liu X, Cai D J Orthop Surg Res. 2024; 19(1):593.

PMID: 39342311 PMC: 11437994. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-024-05010-5.

Excellent results of restricted kinematic alignment total knee arthroplasty at a minimum of 10 years of follow-up.

Morcos M, Beckers G, Salvi A, Bennani M, Masse V, Vendittoli P Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2024; 33(2):654-665.

PMID: 39248213 PMC: 11792112. DOI: 10.1002/ksa.12452.

References

Almaawi A, Hutt J, Masse V, Lavigne M, Vendittoli P . The Impact of Mechanical and Restricted Kinematic Alignment on Knee Anatomy in Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2017; 32(7):2133-2140. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.02.028. View

Bedair H, Lawless B, Malchau H . Are implant designer series believable? Comparison of survivorship between designer series and national registries. J Arthroplasty. 2013; 28(5):728-31. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2012.08.027. View

Bellemans J, Colyn W, Vandenneucker H, Victor J . The Chitranjan Ranawat award: is neutral mechanical alignment normal for all patients? The concept of constitutional varus. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011; 470(1):45-53. PMC: 3237976. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-011-1936-5. View

Bourne R, Chesworth B, Davis A, Mahomed N, Charron K . Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: who is satisfied and who is not?. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009; 468(1):57-63. PMC: 2795819. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-009-1119-9. View

Choong P, Dowsey M, Stoney J . Does accurate anatomical alignment result in better function and quality of life? Comparing conventional and computer-assisted total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2008; 24(4):560-9. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2008.02.018. View

Delport H, Labey L, Innocenti B, De Corte R, Vander Sloten J, Bellemans J . Restoration of constitutional alignment in TKA leads to more physiological strains in the collateral ligaments. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014; 23(8):2159-2169. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-014-2971-z. View

Fang D, Ritter M, Davis K . Coronal alignment in total knee arthroplasty: just how important is it?. J Arthroplasty. 2009; 24(6 Suppl):39-43. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2009.04.034. View

Fujimoto E, Sasashige Y, Tomita T, Kashiwagi K, Inoue A, Sawa M . Different femorotibial contact on the weight-bearing: midflexion between normal and varus aligned knees after total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2014; 23(6):1720-8. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-014-3194-z. View

Graden N, Dean R, Kahat D, DePhillipo N, LaPrade R . True Mechanical Alignment is Found Only on Full-Limb and not on Standard Anteroposterior Radiographs. Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil. 2020; 2(6):e753-e759. PMC: 7754530. DOI: 10.1016/j.asmr.2020.06.010. View

10.

Gromov K, Korchi M, Thomsen M, Husted H, Troelsen A . What is the optimal alignment of the tibial and femoral components in knee arthroplasty?. Acta Orthop. 2014; 85(5):480-7. PMC: 4164865. DOI: 10.3109/17453674.2014.940573. View

11.

Hirschmann M, Moser L, Amsler F, Behrend H, Leclercq V, Hess S . Phenotyping the knee in young non-osteoarthritic knees shows a wide distribution of femoral and tibial coronal alignment. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019; 27(5):1385-1393. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-019-05508-0. View

12.

Hirschmann M, Moser L, Amsler F, Behrend H, Leclerq V, Hess S . Functional knee phenotypes: a novel classification for phenotyping the coronal lower limb alignment based on the native alignment in young non-osteoarthritic patients. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2019; 27(5):1394-1402. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-019-05509-z. View

13.

Nedopil A, Howell S, Hull M . More passive internal tibial rotation with posterior cruciate ligament retention than with excision in a medial pivot TKA implanted with unrestricted caliper verified kinematic alignment. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021; 31(3):852-860. PMC: 9958185. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-021-06840-0. View

14.

Howell S, Papadopoulos S, Kuznik K, Hull M . Accurate alignment and high function after kinematically aligned TKA performed with generic instruments. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2013; 21(10):2271-80. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-013-2621-x. View

15.

Howell S, Howell S, Kuznik K, Cohen J, Hull M . Does a kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty restore function without failure regardless of alignment category?. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012; 471(3):1000-7. PMC: 3563808. DOI: 10.1007/s11999-012-2613-z. View

16.

Howell S, Papadopoulos S, Kuznik K, Ghaly L, Hull M . Does varus alignment adversely affect implant survival and function six years after kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty?. Int Orthop. 2015; 39(11):2117-24. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-015-2743-5. View

17.

Howell S, Shelton T, Hull M . Implant Survival and Function Ten Years After Kinematically Aligned Total Knee Arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2018; 33(12):3678-3684. DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.07.020. View

18.

Khatib Y, Xia A, Naylor J, Harris I, Sorial R . Different targets of mechanical alignment do not improve knee outcomes after TKA. Knee. 2019; 26(6):1395-1402. DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2019.08.004. View

19.

Kim Y, Park J, Kim J, Park S . The relationship between the survival of total knee arthroplasty and postoperative coronal, sagittal and rotational alignment of knee prosthesis. Int Orthop. 2013; 38(2):379-85. PMC: 3923934. DOI: 10.1007/s00264-013-2097-9. View

20.

Laende E, Richardson C, Dunbar M . A randomized controlled trial of tibial component migration with kinematic alignment using patient-specific instrumentation versus mechanical alignment using computer-assisted surgery in total knee arthroplasty. Bone Joint J. 2019; 101-B(8):929-940. DOI: 10.1302/0301-620X.101B8.BJJ-2018-0755.R3. View