» Articles » PMID: 23414935

Are Implant Designer Series Believable? Comparison of Survivorship Between Designer Series and National Registries

Overview
Journal J Arthroplasty
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2013 Feb 19
PMID 23414935
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Performance of hip and knee implants reported by the designing surgeon(s) is often felt to be more optimistic than those observed in non-designer series. The purpose of this study is to compare the survivorship of hip and knee prostheses in series reported by designers with those in national joint registries. Fifteen different hip and knee implant results published by designers were identified and compared to four national registries. Thirty-two percent of comparisons performed demonstrated greater survivorship in the designer series compared to the registry, while 0% reported lower, and 68% demonstrated no difference. Two implants accounted for the majority (12/16) of the discordances. There was a lower (62%) concordance rate between the registries than between the designer series and registries (68%).

Citing Articles

What is the "safe zone" for transition of coronal alignment from systematic to a more personalised one in total knee arthroplasty? A systematic review.

Schelker B, Nowakowski A, Hirschmann M Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022; 30(2):419-427.

PMID: 34973095 PMC: 8866271. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-021-06811-5.


What have we learned from 100% success of press fit condylar rotating platform posterior stabilized knees?: A 5-10 years followup by a nondesigner.

Vaidya S, Virani S, Phunde R, Mahajan A Indian J Orthop. 2016; 50(6):647-654.

PMID: 27904221 PMC: 5122261. DOI: 10.4103/0019-5413.193488.