» Articles » PMID: 37991599

Definitions and Consequences of Current Alignment Techniques and Phenotypes in Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) - There is No Winner Yet

Overview
Journal J Exp Orthop
Publisher Wiley
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 2023 Nov 22
PMID 37991599
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Dissatisfaction following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been extensively documented and it was attributed to numerous factors. In recent years, significant focus has been directed towards implant alignment and stability as potential causes and solutions to this issue. Surgeons are now exploring a more personalized approach to TKA, recognizing the importance of thoroughly understanding each individual patient's anatomy and functional morphology. A more comprehensive preoperative analysis of alignment and knee morphology is essential to address the unresolved questions in knee arthroplasty effectively. The crucial task of determining the most appropriate alignment strategy for each patient arises, given the substantial variability in bone resection resulting from the interplay of phenotype and the alignment strategy chosen. This review aims to comprehensively present the definitions of different alignment techniques in all planes and discuss the consequences dependent on knee phenotypes.Level of evidence V.

Citing Articles

Robotic total knee arthroplasty for moderate to high-grade valgus knee deformity: technique and outcomes.

Kalyan K, Singh A, Kumar P, Gundalli A, Mane S, Swarnkar H SICOT J. 2025; 11:12.

PMID: 40035462 PMC: 11878094. DOI: 10.1051/sicotj/2025005.


Functional knee positioning in patients with valgus deformity undergoing image-based robotic total knee arthroplasty: Surgical technique.

Gregori P, Koutserimpas C, De Fazio A, Descombris S, Servien E, Batailler C SICOT J. 2025; 11:7.

PMID: 39927688 PMC: 11809196. DOI: 10.1051/sicotj/2025001.


Better accuracy of robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty compared to conventional technique in patients with failed high tibial osteotomy.

Baek J, Lee S, Lee D, Heo J, Kim T, Ahn H PLoS One. 2024; 19(11):e0313391.

PMID: 39527607 PMC: 11554210. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313391.


Enhancing research methods: The role of systematic and scoping reviews in orthopaedics, sports medicine and rehabilitation.

Prill R, Krolikowska A, Kayaalp M, Ramadanov N, Karlsson J, Hirschmann M J Exp Orthop. 2024; 11(4):e70069.

PMID: 39502322 PMC: 11534858. DOI: 10.1002/jeo2.70069.


Simulation of osteotomy in total knee arthroplasty with femoral extra-articular deformity assisted by artificial intelligence: a study based on three-dimensional models.

Meng C, Yang S, Zhang Y, Yang L, Shi H, Xu Y J Orthop Surg Res. 2024; 19(1):641.

PMID: 39385180 PMC: 11465894. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-024-05126-8.


References
1.
Begum F, Kayani B, Magan A, Chang J, Haddad F . Current concepts in total knee arthroplasty : mechanical, kinematic, anatomical, and functional alignment. Bone Jt Open. 2021; 2(6):397-404. PMC: 8244789. DOI: 10.1302/2633-1462.26.BJO-2020-0162.R1. View

2.
Cherian J, Kapadia B, Banerjee S, Jauregui J, Issa K, Mont M . Mechanical, Anatomical, and Kinematic Axis in TKA: Concepts and Practical Applications. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2014; 7(2):89-95. PMC: 4092202. DOI: 10.1007/s12178-014-9218-y. View

3.
Hinterwimmer F, Lazic I, Suren C, Hirschmann M, Pohlig F, Rueckert D . Machine learning in knee arthroplasty: specific data are key-a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022; 30(2):376-388. PMC: 8866371. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-021-06848-6. View

4.
Blakeney W, Clement J, Desmeules F, Hagemeister N, Riviere C, Vendittoli P . Kinematic alignment in total knee arthroplasty better reproduces normal gait than mechanical alignment. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018; 27(5):1410-1417. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-018-5174-1. View

5.
Dobbelaere A, Muller J, Ait-Si-Selmi T, Gousopoulos L, Saffarini M, Bonnin M . Sagittal femoral condylar shape varies along a continuum from spherical to ovoid: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022; 143(6):3347-3361. DOI: 10.1007/s00402-022-04613-z. View