» Articles » PMID: 33364613

True Mechanical Alignment is Found Only on Full-Limb and Not on Standard Anteroposterior Radiographs

Overview
Date 2020 Dec 28
PMID 33364613
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare alignment measured on standard anteroposterior (AP) radiographs versus full-length weight-bearing radiographs.

Methods: Patients were prospectively enrolled from June 2019 to August 2019 from a single orthopedic surgeon's practice if they were ≥ 18 years of age, obtained both AP and full-length alignment radiographs and were capable of full weight-bearing with appropriate positioning. Patients were excluded if they were < 18 years of age, had previous knee arthroplasty, previous knee or hip osteotomy, were unable to bear full weight on both limbs, and if the patient's body habitus precluded appropriate visualization of necessary landmarks on the radiographs. Tibiofemoral angles were measured on AP radiographs using 2 techniques (AP angles 1 and 2). Linear regression and paired tests were used to compare measurements. The minimal clinically important difference was defined as < 2°.

Results: There were 120 patients (62 males, 58 females) with an average age of 45 ± 17 years who were enrolled. There were positive correlations between average alignment on full-length weight-bearing and AP radiographs for AP angle 1 ( = 0.72) and AP angle 2 ( = 0.76) measurement techniques ( < .001). There was a significant difference in mean alignment between full-length weight-bearing and AP measurements (AP angle 1: 2.5° difference; AP angle 2: 4.4° difference; < .001). Frequency distributions for the minimal clinically important difference between true mechanical alignment and AP views demonstrated that 46.7% of patients had ≥ 2° difference for AP angle 1, and 78.3% of patients had ≥ 2° difference for AP angle 2.

Conclusion: The average absolute difference in alignment measured between standard AP radiograph and full-length weight-bearing radiograph views was significant, with 46.7% to 78.3% of patients having a greater than 2° absolute difference between these 2 views. In cases where precise objective alignment measurement is necessary, full-length weight-bearing radiographs are recommended over standard AP radiographs for presurgical planning so as to reduce potential error in over- or underestimation of the true mechanical alignment.

Study Design: Prospective case-comparison; Level of evidence, 1.

Citing Articles

Joint line and knee osteotomy.

Pratobevera A, Seil R, Menetrey J EFORT Open Rev. 2024; 9(5):375-386.

PMID: 38726996 PMC: 11099584. DOI: 10.1530/EOR-24-0037.


Reliability and validity of OpenPose for measuring hip-knee-ankle angle in patients with knee osteoarthritis.

Saiki Y, Kabata T, Ojima T, Kajino Y, Inoue D, Ohmori T Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):3297.

PMID: 36841842 PMC: 9968277. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-30352-1.


Significant changes in lower limb alignment due to flexion and rotation-a systematic 3D simulation of radiographic measurements.

Brunner J, Jorgens M, Weigert M, Kumpel H, Degen N, Fuermetz J Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2023; 31(4):1483-1490.

PMID: 36595052 PMC: 10050026. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-022-07302-x.


What is the "safe zone" for transition of coronal alignment from systematic to a more personalised one in total knee arthroplasty? A systematic review.

Schelker B, Nowakowski A, Hirschmann M Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2022; 30(2):419-427.

PMID: 34973095 PMC: 8866271. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-021-06811-5.


Reliability of Preoperative Planning Method That Considers Latent Medial Joint Laxity in Medial Open-Wedge Proximal Tibial Osteotomy.

Ryu D, Lee S, Jung E, Kim J, Shin T, Wang J Orthop J Sports Med. 2021; 9(10):23259671211034151.

PMID: 34631902 PMC: 8495530. DOI: 10.1177/23259671211034151.


References
1.
Kraus V, Vail T, Worrell T, McDaniel G . A comparative assessment of alignment angle of the knee by radiographic and physical examination methods. Arthritis Rheum. 2005; 52(6):1730-5. DOI: 10.1002/art.21100. View

2.
Colebatch A, Hart D, Zhai G, Williams F, Spector T, Arden N . Effective measurement of knee alignment using AP knee radiographs. Knee. 2008; 16(1):42-5. DOI: 10.1016/j.knee.2008.07.007. View

3.
Antony B, Driban J, Price L, Lo G, Ward R, Nevitt M . The relationship between meniscal pathology and osteoarthritis depends on the type of meniscal damage visible on magnetic resonance images: data from the Osteoarthritis Initiative. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2016; 25(1):76-84. PMC: 5310282. DOI: 10.1016/j.joca.2016.08.004. View

4.
Navali A, Azhar Shekoufeh Bahari L, Nazari B . A comparative assessment of alternatives to the full-leg radiograph for determining knee joint alignment. Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Ther Technol. 2012; 4(1):40. PMC: 3534575. DOI: 10.1186/1758-2555-4-40. View

5.
Bito H, Takeuchi R, Kumagai K, Aratake M, Saito I, Hayashi R . A predictive factor for acquiring an ideal lower limb realignment after opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2009; 17(4):382-9. DOI: 10.1007/s00167-008-0706-8. View