» Articles » PMID: 34901465

MRI-based 3D Retinal Shape Determination

Overview
Specialty Ophthalmology
Date 2021 Dec 13
PMID 34901465
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To establish a good method to determine the retinal shape from MRI using three-dimensional (3D) ellipsoids as well as evaluate its reproducibility.

Methods And Analysis: The left eyes of 31 volunteers were imaged using high-resolution ocular MRI. The 3D MR-images were segmented and ellipsoids were fitted to the resulting contours. The dependency of the resulting ellipsoid parameters on the evaluated fraction of the retinal contour was assessed by fitting ellipsoids to 41 different fractions. Furthermore, the reproducibility of the complete procedure was evaluated in four subjects. Finally, a comparison with conventional two-dimensional (2D) methods was made.

Results: The mean distance between the fitted ellipsoids and the segmented retinal contour was 0.03±0.01 mm (mean±SD) for the central retina and 0.13±0.03 mm for the peripheral retina. For the central retina, the resulting ellipsoid radii were 12.9±0.9, 13.7±1.5 and 12.2±1.2 mm along the horizontal, vertical and central axes. For the peripheral retina, these radii decreased to 11.9±0.6, 11.6±0.4 and 10.4±0.7 mm, which was accompanied by a mean 1.8 mm posterior shift of the ellipsoid centre. The reproducibility of the ellipsoid fitting was 0.3±1.2 mm for the central retina and 0.0±0.1 mm for the peripheral retina. When 2D methods were used to fit the peripheral retina, the fitted radii differed a mean 0.1±0.1 mm from the 3D method.

Conclusion: An accurate and reproducible determination of the 3D retinal shape based on MRI is provided together with 2D alternatives, enabling wider use of this method in the field of ophthalmology.

Citing Articles

Geometrical accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for ocular proton therapy planning.

Klaassen L, Haasjes C, Hol M, Cambraia Lopes P, Spruijt K, Van De Steeg-Henzen C Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2024; 31:100598.

PMID: 38993288 PMC: 11234150. DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2024.100598.


Eye Size and Shape in Relation to Refractive Error in Children: A Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study.

Kneepkens S, Marstal K, Polling J, Jaddoe V, Vernooij M, Poot D Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2023; 64(15):41.

PMID: 38153751 PMC: 10756250. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.64.15.41.


Peripheral visual field shifts after intraocular lens implantation.

van Vught L, Luyten G, Beenakker J J Cataract Refract Surg. 2023; 49(12):1270-1274.

PMID: 37702454 PMC: 10664812. DOI: 10.1097/j.jcrs.0000000000001299.


Magnetic resonance imaging reveals possible cause of diplopia after Baerveldt glaucoma implantation.

Islamaj E, van Vught L, Jordaan-Kuip C, Vermeer K, Ferreira T, de Waard P PLoS One. 2022; 17(10):e0276527.

PMID: 36264982 PMC: 9584370. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0276527.

References
1.
Beenakker J, van Rijn G, Luyten G, Webb A . High-resolution MRI of uveal melanoma using a microcoil phased array at 7 T. NMR Biomed. 2013; 26(12):1864-9. DOI: 10.1002/nbm.3041. View

2.
Berkowitz B, McDonald C, Ito Y, Tofts P, Latif Z, Gross J . Measuring the human retinal oxygenation response to a hyperoxic challenge using MRI: eliminating blinking artifacts and demonstrating proof of concept. Magn Reson Med. 2001; 46(2):412-6. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.1206. View

3.
Olsen T . Calculation of intraocular lens power: a review. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2007; 85(5):472-85. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0420.2007.00879.x. View

4.
Gokul A, Vellara H, Patel D . Advanced anterior segment imaging in keratoconus: a review. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2017; 46(2):122-132. DOI: 10.1111/ceo.13108. View

5.
Beenakker J, Shamonin D, Webb A, Luyten G, Stoel B . Automated retinal topographic maps measured with magnetic resonance imaging. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2015; 56(2):1033-9. DOI: 10.1167/iovs.14-15161. View