» Articles » PMID: 33336379

Three-dimensional MRI-based Treatment Planning Approach for Non-invasive Ocular Proton Therapy

Overview
Journal Med Phys
Specialty Biophysics
Date 2020 Dec 18
PMID 33336379
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: To develop a high-resolution three-dimensional (3D) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based treatment planning approach for uveal melanomas (UM) in proton therapy.

Materials/methods: For eight patients with UM, a segmentation of the gross tumor volume (GTV) and organs-at-risk (OARs) was performed on T1- and T2-weighted 7 Tesla MRI image data to reconstruct the patient MR-eye. An extended contour was defined with a 2.5-mm isotropic margin derived from the GTV. A broad beam algorithm, which we have called πDose, was implemented to calculate relative proton absorbed doses to the ipsilateral OARs. Clinically favorable gazing angles of the treated eye were assessed by calculating a global weighted-sum objective function, which set penalties for OARs and extreme gazing angles. An optimizer, which we have named OPT'im-Eye-Tool, was developed to tune the parameters of the functions for sparing critical-OARs.

Results: In total, 441 gazing angles were simulated for every patient. Target coverage including margins was achieved in all the cases (V  > 95%). Over the whole gazing angles solutions space, maximum dose (D ) to the optic nerve and the macula, and mean doses (D ) to the lens, the ciliary body and the sclera were calculated. A forward optimization was applied by OPT'im-Eye-Tool in three different prioritizations: iso-weighted, optic nerve prioritized, and macula prioritized. In each, the function values were depicted in a selection tool to select the optimal gazing angle(s). For example, patient 4 had a T2 equatorial tumor. The optimization applied for the straight gazing angle resulted in objective function values of 0.46 (iso-weighted situation), 0.90 (optic nerve prioritization) and 0.08 (macula prioritization) demonstrating the impact of that angle in different clinical approaches.

Conclusions: The feasibility and suitability of a 3D MRI-based treatment planning approach have been successfully tested on a cohort of eight patients diagnosed with UM. Moreover, a gaze-angle trade-off dose optimization with respect to OARs sparing has been developed. Further validation of the whole treatment process is the next step in the goal to achieve both a non-invasive and a personalized proton therapy treatment.

Citing Articles

Comparison of stereotactic radiotherapy and protons for uveal melanoma patients.

Fleury E, Pignol J, Kilic E, Milder M, van Rij C, Naus N Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2024; 31:100605.

PMID: 39050744 PMC: 11268348. DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2024.100605.


Geometrical accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging for ocular proton therapy planning.

Klaassen L, Haasjes C, Hol M, Cambraia Lopes P, Spruijt K, Van De Steeg-Henzen C Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2024; 31:100598.

PMID: 38993288 PMC: 11234150. DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2024.100598.


Synchronous functional magnetic resonance eye imaging, video ophthalmoscopy, and eye surface imaging reveal the human brain and eye pulsation mechanisms.

Ebrahimi S, Tuunanen J, Saarela V, Honkamo M, Huotari N, Raitamaa L Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):2250.

PMID: 38278832 PMC: 10817967. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-51069-1.


Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Clinical Care for Uveal Melanoma Patients-A Systematic Review from an Ophthalmic Perspective.

Jaarsma-Coes M, Klaassen L, Marinkovic M, Luyten G, Vu T, Ferreira T Cancers (Basel). 2023; 15(11).

PMID: 37296958 PMC: 10252038. DOI: 10.3390/cancers15112995.


MR-based follow-up after brachytherapy and proton beam therapy in uveal melanoma.

Tang M, Ferreira T, Marinkovic M, Jaarsma-Coes M, Klaassen L, Vu T Neuroradiology. 2023; 65(8):1271-1285.

PMID: 37249621 PMC: 10227806. DOI: 10.1007/s00234-023-03166-1.


References
1.
La Rosa V, Kacperek A, Royle G, Gibson A . Range verification for eye proton therapy based on proton-induced x-ray emissions from implanted metal markers. Phys Med Biol. 2014; 59(11):2623-38. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/59/11/2623. View

2.
Weber B, Paton K, Ma R, Pickles T . Outcomes of Proton Beam Radiotherapy for Large Non-Peripapillary Choroidal and Ciliary Body Melanoma at TRIUMF and the BC Cancer Agency. Ocul Oncol Pathol. 2016; 2(1):29-35. PMC: 4847687. DOI: 10.1159/000433546. View

3.
Pfeiffer K, Bendl R . Real-time dose calculation and visualization for the proton therapy of ocular tumours. Phys Med Biol. 2001; 46(3):671-86. DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/46/3/304. View

4.
Graessl A, Muhle M, Schwerter M, Rieger J, Oezerdem C, Santoro D . Ophthalmic magnetic resonance imaging at 7 T using a 6-channel transceiver radiofrequency coil array in healthy subjects and patients with intraocular masses. Invest Radiol. 2014; 49(5):260-70. DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000049. View

5.
Lemke A, Hosten N, Wiegel T, Prinz R, Richter M, Bechrakis N . Intraocular metastases: differential diagnosis from uveal melanomas with high-resolution MRI using a surface coil. Eur Radiol. 2001; 11(12):2593-601. DOI: 10.1007/s003300100936. View