» Articles » PMID: 34650076

Generating Synthetic Contrast Enhancement from Non-contrast Chest Computed Tomography Using a Generative Adversarial Network

Overview
Journal Sci Rep
Specialty Science
Date 2021 Oct 15
PMID 34650076
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study aimed to evaluate a deep learning model for generating synthetic contrast-enhanced CT (sCECT) from non-contrast chest CT (NCCT). A deep learning model was applied to generate sCECT from NCCT. We collected three separate data sets, the development set (n = 25) for model training and tuning, test set 1 (n = 25) for technical evaluation, and test set 2 (n = 12) for clinical utility evaluation. In test set 1, image similarity metrics were calculated. In test set 2, the lesion contrast-to-noise ratio of the mediastinal lymph nodes was measured, and an observer study was conducted to compare lesion conspicuity. Comparisons were performed using the paired t-test or Wilcoxon signed-rank test. In test set 1, sCECT showed a lower mean absolute error (41.72 vs 48.74; P < .001), higher peak signal-to-noise ratio (17.44 vs 15.97; P < .001), higher multiscale structural similarity index measurement (0.84 vs 0.81; P < .001), and lower learned perceptual image patch similarity metric (0.14 vs 0.15; P < .001) than NCCT. In test set 2, the contrast-to-noise ratio of the mediastinal lymph nodes was higher in the sCECT group than in the NCCT group (6.15 ± 5.18 vs 0.74 ± 0.69; P < .001). The observer study showed for all reviewers higher lesion conspicuity in NCCT with sCECT than in NCCT alone (P ≤ .001). Synthetic CECT generated from NCCT improves the depiction of mediastinal lymph nodes.

Citing Articles

Development of quantitative PET/MR imaging for measurements of hepatic portal vein input function: a phantom study.

Chalampalakis Z, Ortner M, Almuttairi M, Bauer M, Tamm E, Schmidt A EJNMMI Phys. 2024; 11(1):90.

PMID: 39489802 PMC: 11532313. DOI: 10.1186/s40658-024-00694-4.


Calculation of virtual 3D subtraction angiographies using conditional generative adversarial networks (cGANs).

Muller S, Einspanner E, Klebingat S, Zubel S, Schwab R, Fuchs E BMC Med Imaging. 2024; 24(1):276.

PMID: 39407196 PMC: 11481798. DOI: 10.1186/s12880-024-01454-7.


Clinical feasibility of deep learning based synthetic contrast enhanced abdominal CT in patients undergoing non enhanced CT scans.

Han S, Kim J, Park J, Kim S, Park S, Cho J Sci Rep. 2024; 14(1):17635.

PMID: 39085456 PMC: 11291756. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-68705-z.


CT-based synthetic contrast-enhanced dual-energy CT generation using conditional denoising diffusion probabilistic model.

Gao Y, Qiu R, Xie H, Chang C, Wang T, Ghavidel B Phys Med Biol. 2024; 69(16).

PMID: 39053511 PMC: 11294926. DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad67a1.


Evolving and Novel Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Thoracic Imaging.

Chang J, Makary M Diagnostics (Basel). 2024; 14(13).

PMID: 39001346 PMC: 11240935. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14131456.


References
1.
Kleesiek J, Morshuis J, Isensee F, Deike-Hofmann K, Paech D, Kickingereder P . Can Virtual Contrast Enhancement in Brain MRI Replace Gadolinium?: A Feasibility Study. Invest Radiol. 2019; 54(10):653-660. DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000583. View

2.
Gong E, Pauly J, Wintermark M, Zaharchuk G . Deep learning enables reduced gadolinium dose for contrast-enhanced brain MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2018; 48(2):330-340. DOI: 10.1002/jmri.25970. View

3.
Beckett K, Moriarity A, Langer J . Safe Use of Contrast Media: What the Radiologist Needs to Know. Radiographics. 2015; 35(6):1738-50. DOI: 10.1148/rg.2015150033. View

4.
Chakraborty D . Recent developments in imaging system assessment methodology, FROC analysis and the search model. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res A. 2011; 648 Supplement 1:S297-S301. PMC: 3144765. DOI: 10.1016/j.nima.2010.11.042. View

5.
Kodzwa R . ACR Manual on Contrast Media: 2018 Updates. Radiol Technol. 2019; 91(1):97-100. View