Dual-energy Liver CT: Effect of Monochromatic Imaging on Lesion Detection, Conspicuity, and Contrast-to-noise Ratio of Hypervascular Lesions on Late Arterial Phase
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Objective: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of use of dual-energy CT monochromatic imaging in the late hepatic arterial phase on hyperenhancing focal lesion detection and lesion conspicuity.
Subjects And Methods: This prospective study included 72 patients imaged with a single-source dual-energy CT scanner. Late arterial phase imaging was performed with dual energies of 140 and 80 kVp, and the portal venous and delayed phases were performed with a single energy of 120 kVp. Two deidentified image sets were created: set A consisted of 77-keV images only, and set B consisted of 40-, 50-, 70-, and 77-keV images and iodine-based contrast material decomposition images. Two independent reviewers identified hypervascular lesions and subjectively scored lesion conspicuity. Contrast-to-noise ratios were calculated, and radiation dose (volume CT dose index) was recorded.
Results: The 128 lesions identified had a mean size of 1.7 ± 1.4 cm. There was no difference in lesion detection between the two reviewers or the two image sets. The contrast-to-noise ratio at 50 keV was 72% greater than that at 77 keV (p < 0.0001). Subjective conspicuity was statistically greatest at 50 keV (p < 0.0001). There was no statistical difference in mean volume CT dose index between the dual-energy (12.8 mGy) and the two single-energy (14.4 and 14.2 mGy) phases.
Conclusion: Viewing dual-energy CT images may result in the greatest subjective lesion conspicuity and measured contrast-to-noise ratio at 50 keV with equal detection of hyperenhancing liver lesions compared with viewing 77-keV images alone. In addition, the radiation doses of dual-energy CT may be similar to those of single-energy CT.
Wildman-Tobriner B, Felice N, Kalisz K, Allen B, Thomas S, Kruse D Radiology. 2025; 314(1):e241568.
PMID: 39807984 PMC: 11783162. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.241568.
Cheng Q, Zhang J, Hu M, Wang S, Liu Y, Li J Bioengineering (Basel). 2025; 11(12.
PMID: 39768075 PMC: 11673124. DOI: 10.3390/bioengineering11121257.
Photon counting CT clinical adoption, integration, and workflow.
Dane B, Froemming A, Schwartz F, Toshav A, Ramirez-Giraldo J, Ananthakrishnan L Abdom Radiol (NY). 2024; 49(12):4600-4609.
PMID: 39052057 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-024-04503-5.
Hu M, Wei W, Zhang J, Wang S, Tong X, Fan Y Abdom Radiol (NY). 2024; 49(11):3883-3892.
PMID: 38937340 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-024-04459-6.
Koike Y, Ohira S, Kihara S, Anetai Y, Takegawa H, Nakamura S J Imaging Inform Med. 2024; 37(5):2688-2697.
PMID: 38637424 PMC: 11522201. DOI: 10.1007/s10278-024-01111-z.