» Articles » PMID: 34383862

Trends in Cesarean Section Rates in Private and Public Facilities in Rural Eastern Maharashtra, India from 2010-2017

Overview
Journal PLoS One
Date 2021 Aug 12
PMID 34383862
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Introduction: Rates of cesarean sections (CS) have increased dramatically over the past two decades in India. This increase has been disproportionately high in private facilities, but little is known about the drivers of the CS rate increase and how they vary over time and geographically.

Methods: Women enrolled in the Nagpur, India site of the Global Network for Women's and Children's Health Research Maternal and Neonatal Health Registry, who delivered in a health facility with CS capability were included in this study. The trend in CS rates from 2010 to 2017 in public and private facilities were assessed and displayed by subdistrict. Multivariable generalized estimating equations models were used to assess the association of delivering in private versus public facilities with having a CS, adjusting for known risk factors.

Results: CS rates increased substantially between 2010 and 2017 at both public and private facilities. The odds of having a CS at a private facility were 40% higher than at a public facility after adjusting for other known risk factors. CS rates had unequal spatial distributions at the subdistrict level.

Discussion: Our study findings contribute to the knowledge of increasing CS rates in both public and private facilities in India. Maps of the spatial distribution of subdistrict-based CS rates are helpful in understanding patterns of CS deliveries, but more investigation as to why clusters of high CS rates have formed in warranted.

Citing Articles

Cesarean Section Trends and Associated Factors at a Tertiary Care Center in India: A Retrospective Study.

Malik N, Kapoor B, Singh R, Sarkar R, Khan I Cureus. 2024; 16(11):e73308.

PMID: 39659321 PMC: 11628194. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.73308.


Birthweight trends and their explanatory factors in Hungary between 1999 and 2018: an analysis of the Hungarian Tauffer registry.

Zsirai L, Kun A, Visolyi G, Svebis M, Domjan B, Tabak A Reprod Health. 2024; 21(1):52.

PMID: 38609984 PMC: 11015640. DOI: 10.1186/s12978-024-01787-0.


Frequency of Caesarean Section Classified by Robson's Ten Group Classification System: A Scoping Review.

Jiandani F, Somalwar S, Bhalerao A Cureus. 2023; 15(6):e41091.

PMID: 37519485 PMC: 10378715. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.41091.


Are cesarean deliveries equitable in India: assessment using benefit incidence analysis.

Singh R, Mishra S, Mohanty S BMC Health Serv Res. 2022; 22(1):670.

PMID: 35585584 PMC: 9118745. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-07984-6.


Prevalence and Factors Associated With Caesarean Delivery in Nepal: Evidence From a Nationally Representative Sample.

Das P, Samad N, Sapkota A, Al-Banna H, Rahman N, Ahmad R Cureus. 2022; 13(12):e20326.

PMID: 35028222 PMC: 8743029. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.20326.

References
1.
. Appropriate technology for birth. Lancet. 1985; 2(8452):436-7. View

2.
Betran A, Temmerman M, Kingdon C, Mohiddin A, Opiyo N, Torloni M . Interventions to reduce unnecessary caesarean sections in healthy women and babies. Lancet. 2018; 392(10155):1358-1368. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31927-5. View

3.
Bogg L, Diwan V, Vora K, DeCosta A . Impact of Alternative Maternal Demand-Side Financial Support Programs in India on the Caesarean Section Rates: Indications of Supplier-Induced Demand. Matern Child Health J. 2015; 20(1):11-15. PMC: 4712220. DOI: 10.1007/s10995-015-1810-2. View

4.
Sandall J, Tribe R, Avery L, Mola G, Visser G, Homer C . Short-term and long-term effects of caesarean section on the health of women and children. Lancet. 2018; 392(10155):1349-1357. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31930-5. View

5.
Branch D, Silver R . Managing the primary cesarean delivery rate. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2012; 55(4):946-60. DOI: 10.1097/GRF.0b013e318263c547. View