» Articles » PMID: 29747609

High Prevalence of Cesarean Section Births in Private Sector Health Facilities- Analysis of District Level Household Survey-4 (DLHS-4) of India

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Public Health
Date 2018 May 12
PMID 29747609
Citations 43
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Worldwide rising cesarean section (CS) births is an issue of concern. In India, with increase in institutional deliveries there has also been an increase in cesarean section births. Aim of the study is to quantify the prevalence of cesarean section births in public and private health facility, and also to determine the factors associated with cesarean section births.

Methods: We analyzed data from district level household survey data 4 (DLHS-4) combined individual level dataset for 19 states/UTs of India comprising 24,398 deliveries resulting in 22,111 live births for year 2011. The percentages and Chi-square has been computed for the select variables viz. Socio demographic, maternal, antenatal care and delivery related based on type of births (CS Vs normal births). The multiple logistic regression model has been used to identify the potential risk factors associated with CS births.

Results: Of 22,111 live birth analyzed 49.2% were delivered at public sector, 31.9% at private sector and 18.9% were home deliveries. Prevalence of CS births were 13.7% (95% CI; 13.0- 14.3%) and 37.9% (95% CI; 36.7- 39.0%) in the public and private sectors, respectively. Higher odds of CS births were observed with- delivery at private health facility (OR 3.79; 95% C.I 3.06-4.72), urban residence (OR 1.15; 95% C.I 1.00- 1.35), first delivery after 35 years of maternal age (OR 5.5; 95% C.I 1.85- 16.4), hypertension in pregnancy (OR 1.32; 95% C.I 1.06- 1.65) and breach presentation (OR 2.37; 95% C.I. 1.63- 3.43).

Conclusions: Our findings shows that CS births are nearly three times more in private as compared to public sector health facilities.The higher rates of CS births, especially in private sector, not only increase the cost of care but may pose unnecessary risks to women (when there is no indications for CS). The government of India need to take measures to strengthen existing public health facilities as well as ensure that cesarean sections are performed based upon medical indications in both public and private sector health facilities.

Citing Articles

Impact of normal vs. caesarean deliveries on child nutritional status and mortality in India: insights from NFHS-5 data.

Das U, Rout N BMC Pediatr. 2024; 24(1):781.

PMID: 39614186 PMC: 11606125. DOI: 10.1186/s12887-024-05149-4.


A Higher Maternal Education Level Could Be a Critical Factor in the Exceeded Cesarean Section Delivery in Indonesia.

Yunitawati D, Latifah L, Suryaputri I, Laksono A Iran J Public Health. 2024; 53(1):219-227.

PMID: 38694861 PMC: 11058373. DOI: 10.18502/ijph.v53i1.14698.


Disparities in Elective and Emergency Caesarean Section Rates Among Public and Private Hospitals in the Districts of Andhra Pradesh, India.

Gavvala N, Thomas M B, Jennifer H G Cureus. 2024; 16(2):e54320.

PMID: 38496056 PMC: 10944325. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.54320.


Determinants of a high prevalence of cesarean section among women in eastern Uganda.

Komuhangi A, Akello R, Izudi J Pan Afr Med J. 2024; 46:90.

PMID: 38314237 PMC: 10837275. DOI: 10.11604/pamj.2023.46.90.38208.


Low-Value Surgical Procedures in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Scoping Review.

Albarqouni L, Abukmail E, MohammedAli M, Elejla S, Abuelazm M, Shaikhkhalil H JAMA Netw Open. 2023; 6(11):e2342215.

PMID: 37934494 PMC: 10630901. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.42215.


References
1.
Almeida S, Bettiol H, Barbieri M, Silva A, Ribeiro V . Significant differences in cesarean section rates between a private and a public hospital in Brazil. Cad Saude Publica. 2008; 24(12):2909-18. DOI: 10.1590/s0102-311x2008001200020. View

2.
de Moraes M, Goldenberg P . [Cesarean sections: an epidemic profile]. Cad Saude Publica. 2001; 17(3):509-19. DOI: 10.1590/s0102-311x2001000300007. View

3.
Beogo I, Mendez Rojas B, Gagnon M . Determinants and materno-fetal outcomes related to cesarean section delivery in private and public hospitals in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol. Syst Rev. 2017; 6(1):5. PMC: 5237475. DOI: 10.1186/s13643-016-0402-6. View

4.
Feng X, Xu L, Guo Y, Ronsmans C . Factors influencing rising caesarean section rates in China between 1988 and 2008. Bull World Health Organ. 2012; 90(1):30-9, 39A. PMC: 3260572. DOI: 10.2471/BLT.11.090399. View

5.
Lo J . Patients' attitudes vs. physicians' determination: implications for cesarean sections. Soc Sci Med. 2003; 57(1):91-6. DOI: 10.1016/s0277-9536(02)00301-5. View