» Articles » PMID: 21067593

Caesarean Section Without Medical Indications is Associated with an Increased Risk of Adverse Short-term Maternal Outcomes: the 2004-2008 WHO Global Survey on Maternal and Perinatal Health

Overview
Journal BMC Med
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2010 Nov 12
PMID 21067593
Citations 221
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: There is worldwide debate about the appropriateness of caesarean sections performed without medical indications. In this analysis, we aim to further investigate the relationship between caesarean section without medical indication and severe maternal outcomes.

Methods: This is a multicountry, facility-based survey that used a stratified multistage cluster sampling design to obtain a sample of countries and health institutions worldwide. A total of 24 countries and 373 health facilities participated in this study. Data collection took place during 2004 and 2005 in Africa and the Americas and during 2007 and 2008 in Asia. All women giving birth at the facility during the study period were included and had their medical records reviewed before discharge from the hospital. Univariate and multilevel analysis were performed to study the association between each group's mode of delivery and the severe maternal and perinatal outcome.

Results: A total of 286,565 deliveries were analysed. The overall caesarean section rate was 25.7% and a total of 1.0 percent of all deliveries were caesarean sections without medical indications, either due to maternal request or in the absence of other recorded indications. Compared to spontaneous vaginal delivery, all other modes of delivery presented an association with the increased risk of death, admission to ICU, blood transfusion and hysterectomy, including antepartum caesarean section without medical indications (Adjusted Odds Ratio (Adj OR), 5.93, 95% Confidence Interval (95% CI), 3.88 to 9.05) and intrapartum caesarean section without medical indications (Adj OR, 14.29, 95% CI, 10.91 to 18.72). In addition, this association is stronger in Africa, compared to Asia and Latin America.

Conclusions: Caesarean sections were associated with an intrinsic risk of increased severe maternal outcomes. We conclude that caesarean sections should be performed when a clear benefit is anticipated, a benefit that might compensate for the higher costs and additional risks associated with this operation.

Citing Articles

Maternal and neonatal outcomes at delivery in nulliparous women with advanced maternal age.

Mforteh A, Kra-Friedman A, Karavani G, Hochler H, Lipschuetz M, Calderon-Margalit R BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025; 25(1):270.

PMID: 40069659 PMC: 11899165. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-025-07289-6.


Preference and determinants of delivery mode in pregnant women with one cesarean scar: a cross-sectional study in two urban Ugandan public hospitals.

Nabawanuka B, Ngabirano T, Nankumbi J BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2025; 25(1):127.

PMID: 39915826 PMC: 11800592. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-025-07263-2.


Use of artificial intelligence to study the hospitalization of women undergoing caesarean section.

Scala A, Bifulco G, Borrelli A, Egidio R, Triassi M, Improta G BMC Public Health. 2025; 25(1):238.

PMID: 39833764 PMC: 11749650. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-025-21530-z.


Cesarean Delivery Upon Request in Pregnancies Following Vaginal Delivery: A Nationwide Study.

Jung Y, Wi W, Cho K, Hong S, Oh M, Cho G J Korean Med Sci. 2025; 39(50):e318.

PMID: 39742875 PMC: 11685277. DOI: 10.3346/jkms.2024.39.e318.


How and why does mode of birth affect processes for routine data collection and use? A qualitative study in Bangladesh and Tanzania.

Ruysen H, Majid T, Shamba D, Mhajabin S, Minja J, Rahman A PLOS Glob Public Health. 2024; 4(12):e0003808.

PMID: 39739697 PMC: 11687795. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0003808.


References
1.
Taylor L, Simpson J, Roberts C, Olive E, Henderson-Smart D . Risk of complications in a second pregnancy following caesarean section in the first pregnancy: a population-based study. Med J Aust. 2005; 183(10):515-9. DOI: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2005.tb07152.x. View

2.
Betran A, Merialdi M, Lauer J, Bing-Shun W, Thomas J, Van Look P . Rates of caesarean section: analysis of global, regional and national estimates. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2007; 21(2):98-113. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2007.00786.x. View

3.
Shah A, Faundes A, Machoki M, Bataglia V, Amokrane F, Donner A . Methodological considerations in implementing the WHO Global Survey for Monitoring Maternal and Perinatal Health. Bull World Health Organ. 2008; 86(2):126-31. PMC: 2647388. DOI: 10.2471/blt.06.039842. View

4.
Shah A, Fawole B, Mimunya J, Amokrane F, Nafiou I, Wolomby J . Cesarean delivery outcomes from the WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health in Africa. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009; 107(3):191-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2009.08.013. View

5.
Lavender T, Kingdon C, Hart A, Gyte G, Gabbay M, Neilson J . Could a randomised trial answer the controversy relating to elective caesarean section? National survey of consultant obstetricians and heads of midwifery. BMJ. 2005; 331(7515):490-1. PMC: 1199026. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.38560.572639.3A. View