» Articles » PMID: 31383691

Trends and Determinants of Increasing Caesarean Sections from 2010 to 2013 in a Prospective Population-based Registry in Eastern Rural Maharashtra, India

Overview
Journal BMJ Open
Specialty General Medicine
Date 2019 Aug 7
PMID 31383691
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: Our objective was to describe trends in caesarean section (CS) rates, characteristics of women delivering by CS, reasons for CS and impact of CS on perinatal mortality, in a rural Indian population.

Design: Secondary data analysis using a prospective population-based registry.

Setting: Four districts in Eastern Maharashtra, India, 2010 to 2013.

Participants: 39 026 pregnant women undergoing labour and delivery.

Main Outcomes: CS, single most likely reason, perinatal mortality.

Results: Overall, 20% of the women delivered by CS. Rates increased from 17.4% in 2010 to 22.7% in 2013 (p<0.001) with an absolute risk increase from 1% to 5% during this time-period. Women aged 25+ years old, being nulliparous, having at least a secondary school education, a body mass index 25+ and a multiple gestation pregnancy were more likely to deliver by CS. Perinatal mortality was higher among babies delivered vaginally than those delivered by CS (4.5% vs 2.7%, p<0.001). Prolonged and obstructed labour as the reported reason for CS increased over time for both nulliparous and multiparous women (p<0.001), and 6% to 10% women had no clear reason for CS. Perinatal mortality was higher among babies born vaginally than those delivered by CS (adjusted OR: 0.65, 95% CI 0.56 to 0.76, p<0.001).

Conclusion: Rates of CS increased over time in rural Maharashtra, exceeding WHO recommendations. Characteristics associated with CS and outcomes of CS were similar to previous reports. Further studies are needed to ensure accuracy of reported reasons for CS, why obstructed and prolonged labour leading to CS is increasing in this population and what leads to CS without a clear indication. Such information may be helpful for implementing the Indian Government mandate that no CS be performed without strict medical indications, while ensuring that the overall CS rates are appropriate.

Trial Registration Number: NCT01073475.

Citing Articles

Trends and determinants of the use of episiotomy in a prospective population-based registry from central India.

Austad K, Rao S, Hibberd P, Patel A BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2024; 24(1):598.

PMID: 39267006 PMC: 11396254. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-024-06762-y.


Late and Persistent Symptoms Suggestive of Surgical Site Infections After Cesarean Section: Results from a Prospective Cohort Study in Rural Rwanda.

Mukantwari J, Gatete J, Niyigena A, Alayande B, Nkurunziza T, Mazimpaka C Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2023; 24(10):916-923.

PMID: 38032658 PMC: 10734900. DOI: 10.1089/sur.2023.100.


Prevalence and determinants of caesarean section deliveries in the Kintampo Districts of Ghana.

Gyaase D, Enuameh Y, Adjei B, Gyaase S, Nakua E, Kabanunye M BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2023; 23(1):286.

PMID: 37098478 PMC: 10131307. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-023-05622-5.


Are cesarean deliveries equitable in India: assessment using benefit incidence analysis.

Singh R, Mishra S, Mohanty S BMC Health Serv Res. 2022; 22(1):670.

PMID: 35585584 PMC: 9118745. DOI: 10.1186/s12913-022-07984-6.


Trends in cesarean section rates in private and public facilities in rural eastern Maharashtra, India from 2010-2017.

Simmons E, Lane K, Rao S, Kurhe K, Patel A, Hibberd P PLoS One. 2021; 16(8):e0256096.

PMID: 34383862 PMC: 8360542. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0256096.


References
1.
Manasyan A, Saleem S, Koso-Thomas M, Althabe F, Pasha O, Chomba E . Assessment of obstetric and neonatal health services in developing country health facilities. Am J Perinatol. 2013; 30(9):787-94. PMC: 3664648. DOI: 10.1055/s-0032-1333409. View

2.
Ye J, Zhang J, Mikolajczyk R, Torloni M, Gulmezoglu A, Betran A . Association between rates of caesarean section and maternal and neonatal mortality in the 21st century: a worldwide population-based ecological study with longitudinal data. BJOG. 2015; 123(5):745-53. PMC: 5014131. DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.13592. View

3.
Witt W, Wisk L, Cheng E, Mandell K, Chatterjee D, Wakeel F . Determinants of cesarean delivery in the US: a lifecourse approach. Matern Child Health J. 2014; 19(1):84-93. PMC: 4209310. DOI: 10.1007/s10995-014-1498-8. View

4.
Barrett J, Hannah M, Hutton E, Willan A, Allen A, Armson B . A randomized trial of planned cesarean or vaginal delivery for twin pregnancy. N Engl J Med. 2013; 369(14):1295-305. PMC: 3954096. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1214939. View

5.
Harrison M, Pasha O, Saleem S, Ali S, Chomba E, Carlo W . A prospective study of maternal, fetal and neonatal outcomes in the setting of cesarean section in low- and middle-income countries. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2017; 96(4):410-420. PMC: 5665564. DOI: 10.1111/aogs.13098. View