» Articles » PMID: 34343412

Applications of Machine and Deep Learning to Patient-specific IMRT/VMAT Quality Assurance

Overview
Date 2021 Aug 3
PMID 34343412
Citations 13
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In order to deliver accurate and safe treatment to cancer patients in radiation therapy using advanced techniques such as intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and volumetric-arc radiation therapy (VMAT), patient specific quality assurance (QA) should be performed before treatment. IMRT/VMAT dose measurements in a phantom using various devices have been clinically adopted as standard method for QA. This approach allows the verification of the accuracy of the dose calculation, data transfer, and the delivery system. However, patient-specific QA procedures are expensive and require significant time and effort by the physicists. Over the past 5 years, machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) algorithms for predictions of IMRT/VMAT QA outcome have been investigated. Various ML and DL models have shown promising prediction accuracy and a high potential as time-efficient virtual QA tool. In this paper, we review the ML and DL based models that were developed for patient specific IMRT and VMAT QA outcome predictions from algorithmic and clinical applicability perspectives. We focus on comparing the algorithms, the dataset sizes, the input parameters and features, the QA outcome prediction approaches, the validation, the performance, the clinical applicability, and the potential clinical impact. In addition, we discuss the present challenges as well as the future directions in the implementation of these models. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first review on the application of ML and DL based models in IMRT/VMAT QA predictions.

Citing Articles

MR-linac: role of artificial intelligence and automation.

Psoroulas S, Paunoiu A, Corradini S, Horner-Rieber J, Tanadini-Lang S Strahlenther Onkol. 2025; 201(3):298-305.

PMID: 39843783 PMC: 11839841. DOI: 10.1007/s00066-024-02358-9.


Machine learning and lean six sigma for targeted patient-specific quality assurance of volumetric modulated arc therapy plans.

Lambri N, Dei D, Goretti G, Crespi L, Brioso R, Pelizzoli M Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2024; 31:100617.

PMID: 39224688 PMC: 11367262. DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2024.100617.


Improving the performance of deep learning models in predicting and classifying gamma passing rates with discriminative features and a class balancing technique: a retrospective cohort study.

Song W, Shang W, Li C, Bian X, Lu H, Ma J Radiat Oncol. 2024; 19(1):98.

PMID: 39085872 PMC: 11293183. DOI: 10.1186/s13014-024-02496-5.


Applications of artificial intelligence for machine- and patient-specific quality assurance in radiation therapy: current status and future directions.

Ono T, Iramina H, Hirashima H, Adachi T, Nakamura M, Mizowaki T J Radiat Res. 2024; 65(4):421-432.

PMID: 38798135 PMC: 11262865. DOI: 10.1093/jrr/rrae033.


Error detection for radiotherapy planning validation based on deep learning networks.

Liu S, Ma J, Tang F, Liang Y, Li Y, Li Z J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2024; 25(8):e14372.

PMID: 38709158 PMC: 11302817. DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14372.


References
1.
Ezzell G, Galvin J, Low D, Palta J, Rosen I, Sharpe M . Guidance document on delivery, treatment planning, and clinical implementation of IMRT: report of the IMRT Subcommittee of the AAPM Radiation Therapy Committee. Med Phys. 2003; 30(8):2089-115. DOI: 10.1118/1.1591194. View

2.
Nyflot M, Thammasorn P, Wootton L, Ford E, Chaovalitwongse W . Deep learning for patient-specific quality assurance: Identifying errors in radiotherapy delivery by radiomic analysis of gamma images with convolutional neural networks. Med Phys. 2018; 46(2):456-464. DOI: 10.1002/mp.13338. View

3.
Kry S, Molineu A, Kerns J, Faught A, Huang J, Pulliam K . Institutional patient-specific IMRT QA does not predict unacceptable plan delivery. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014; 90(5):1195-201. PMC: 4276500. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.08.334. View

4.
Granville D, Sutherland J, Belec J, La Russa D . Predicting VMAT patient-specific QA results using a support vector classifier trained on treatment plan characteristics and linac QC metrics. Phys Med Biol. 2019; 64(9):095017. DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ab142e. View

5.
Low D, Harms W, Mutic S, Purdy J . A technique for the quantitative evaluation of dose distributions. Med Phys. 1998; 25(5):656-61. DOI: 10.1118/1.598248. View