» Articles » PMID: 33592625

Power-law Behavior of Transcription Factor Dynamics at the Single-molecule Level Implies a Continuum Affinity Model

Overview
Specialty Biochemistry
Date 2021 Feb 16
PMID 33592625
Citations 46
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Single-molecule tracking (SMT) allows the study of transcription factor (TF) dynamics in the nucleus, giving important information regarding the diffusion and binding behavior of these proteins in the nuclear environment. Dwell time distributions obtained by SMT for most TFs appear to follow bi-exponential behavior. This has been ascribed to two discrete populations of TFs-one non-specifically bound to chromatin and another specifically bound to target sites, as implied by decades of biochemical studies. However, emerging studies suggest alternate models for dwell-time distributions, indicating the existence of more than two populations of TFs (multi-exponential distribution), or even the absence of discrete states altogether (power-law distribution). Here, we present an analytical pipeline to evaluate which model best explains SMT data. We find that a broad spectrum of TFs (including glucocorticoid receptor, oestrogen receptor, FOXA1, CTCF) follow a power-law distribution of dwell-times, blurring the temporal line between non-specific and specific binding, suggesting that productive binding may involve longer binding events than previously believed. From these observations, we propose a continuum of affinities model to explain TF dynamics, that is consistent with complex interactions of TFs with multiple nuclear domains as well as binding and searching on the chromatin template.

Citing Articles

Intrinsically disordered regions as facilitators of the transcription factor target search.

Jonas F, Navon Y, Barkai N Nat Rev Genet. 2025; .

PMID: 39984675 DOI: 10.1038/s41576-025-00816-3.


Thermodynamic principles link transcription factor affinities to single-molecule chromatin states in cells.

Schaepe J, Fries T, Doughty B, Crocker O, Hinks M, Marklund E bioRxiv. 2025; .

PMID: 39975040 PMC: 11838358. DOI: 10.1101/2025.01.27.635162.


Effective in vivo binding energy landscape illustrates kinetic stability of RBPJ-DNA binding.

Huynh D, Hoffmeister P, Friedrich T, Zhang K, Bartkuhn M, Ferrante F Nat Commun. 2025; 16(1):1259.

PMID: 39893191 PMC: 11787368. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-56515-4.


Single-molecule imaging for investigating the transcriptional control.

Choi I, Baek I Mol Cells. 2025; 48(2):100179.

PMID: 39814141 PMC: 11847471. DOI: 10.1016/j.mocell.2025.100179.


Single-molecule analysis of transcription activation: dynamics of SAGA coactivator recruitment.

Jeon J, Friedman L, Zhou D, Seo H, Adeleke O, Graham B Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2025; .

PMID: 39809941 DOI: 10.1038/s41594-024-01451-y.


References
1.
Caccianini L, Normanno D, Izeddin I, Dahan M . Single molecule study of non-specific binding kinetics of LacI in mammalian cells. Faraday Discuss. 2015; 184:393-400. DOI: 10.1039/c5fd00112a. View

2.
Wang J, Zhuang J, Iyer S, Lin X, Whitfield T, Greven M . Sequence features and chromatin structure around the genomic regions bound by 119 human transcription factors. Genome Res. 2012; 22(9):1798-812. PMC: 3431495. DOI: 10.1101/gr.139105.112. View

3.
Nakahashi H, Kieffer Kwon K, Resch W, Vian L, Dose M, Stavreva D . A genome-wide map of CTCF multivalency redefines the CTCF code. Cell Rep. 2013; 3(5):1678-1689. PMC: 3770538. DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2013.04.024. View

4.
Grimm J, English B, Chen J, Slaughter J, Zhang Z, Revyakin A . A general method to improve fluorophores for live-cell and single-molecule microscopy. Nat Methods. 2015; 12(3):244-50, 3 p following 250. PMC: 4344395. DOI: 10.1038/nmeth.3256. View

5.
Goldstein I, Hager G . Dynamic enhancer function in the chromatin context. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Syst Biol Med. 2017; 10(1). PMC: 6638546. DOI: 10.1002/wsbm.1390. View