» Articles » PMID: 33446241

High-resolution Analysis of Cell-state Transitions in Yeast Suggests Widespread Transcriptional Tuning by Alternative Starts

Overview
Journal Genome Biol
Specialties Biology
Genetics
Date 2021 Jan 15
PMID 33446241
Citations 24
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The start and end sites of messenger RNAs (TSSs and TESs) are highly regulated, often in a cell-type-specific manner. Yet the contribution of transcript diversity in regulating gene expression remains largely elusive. We perform an integrative analysis of multiple highly synchronized cell-fate transitions and quantitative genomic techniques in Saccharomyces cerevisiae to identify regulatory functions associated with transcribing alternative isoforms.

Results: Cell-fate transitions feature widespread elevated expression of alternative TSS and, to a lesser degree, TES usage. These dynamically regulated alternative TSSs are located mostly upstream of canonical TSSs, but also within gene bodies possibly encoding for protein isoforms. Increased upstream alternative TSS usage is linked to various effects on canonical TSS levels, which range from co-activation to repression. We identified two key features linked to these outcomes: an interplay between alternative and canonical promoter strengths, and distance between alternative and canonical TSSs. These two regulatory properties give a plausible explanation of how locally transcribed alternative TSSs control gene transcription. Additionally, we find that specific chromatin modifiers Set2, Set3, and FACT play an important role in mediating gene repression via alternative TSSs, further supporting that the act of upstream transcription drives the local changes in gene transcription.

Conclusions: The integrative analysis of multiple cell-fate transitions suggests the presence of a regulatory control system of alternative TSSs that is important for dynamic tuning of gene expression. Our work provides a framework for understanding how TSS heterogeneity governs eukaryotic gene expression, particularly during cell-fate changes.

Citing Articles

Re-appraising the evidence for the source, regulation and function of p53-family isoforms.

Lopez I, Valdivia I, Vojtesek B, Fahraeus R, Coates P Nucleic Acids Res. 2024; 52(20):12112-12129.

PMID: 39404067 PMC: 11551734. DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkae855.


Alternative TSS use is widespread in Cryptococcus fungi in response to environmental cues and regulated genome-wide by the transcription factor Tur1.

Dang T, Maufrais C, Colin J, Moyrand F, Mouyna I, Coppee J PLoS Biol. 2024; 22(7):e3002724.

PMID: 39052688 PMC: 11302930. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002724.


Swi/Snf chromatin remodeling regulates transcriptional interference and gene repression.

Morse K, Bishop A, Swerdlow S, Leslie J, Unal E Mol Cell. 2024; 84(16):3080-3097.e9.

PMID: 39043178 PMC: 11419397. DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2024.06.029.


Truncated protein isoforms generate diversity of protein localization and function in yeast.

Higdon A, Won N, Brar G Cell Syst. 2024; 15(4):388-408.e4.

PMID: 38636458 PMC: 11075746. DOI: 10.1016/j.cels.2024.03.005.


Quantitative analysis of transcription start site selection reveals control by DNA sequence, RNA polymerase II activity and NTP levels.

Zhu Y, Vvedenskaya I, Sze S, Nickels B, Kaplan C Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2024; 31(1):190-202.

PMID: 38177677 PMC: 10928753. DOI: 10.1038/s41594-023-01171-9.


References
1.
Rando O . Genome-wide measurement of histone H3 replacement dynamics in yeast. Methods Mol Biol. 2011; 759:41-60. PMC: 3974389. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-61779-173-4_3. View

2.
Pelechano V, Wei W, Steinmetz L . Extensive transcriptional heterogeneity revealed by isoform profiling. Nature. 2013; 497(7447):127-31. PMC: 3705217. DOI: 10.1038/nature12121. View

3.
Marion R, Regev A, Segal E, Barash Y, Koller D, Friedman N . Sfp1 is a stress- and nutrient-sensitive regulator of ribosomal protein gene expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004; 101(40):14315-22. PMC: 521938. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0405353101. View

4.
Rawal Y, Chereji R, Valabhoju V, Qiu H, Ocampo J, Clark D . Gcn4 Binding in Coding Regions Can Activate Internal and Canonical 5' Promoters in Yeast. Mol Cell. 2018; 70(2):297-311.e4. PMC: 6133248. DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2018.03.007. View

5.
Phizicky D, Bell S . Transcriptional repression of CDC6 and SLD2 during meiosis is associated with production of short heterogeneous RNA isoforms. Chromosoma. 2018; 127(4):515-527. PMC: 6532647. DOI: 10.1007/s00412-018-0681-x. View