» Articles » PMID: 3339093

A Stochastic Model for Leukocyte Random Motility and Chemotaxis Based on Receptor Binding Fluctuations

Overview
Journal J Cell Biol
Specialty Cell Biology
Date 1988 Feb 1
PMID 3339093
Citations 71
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Two central features of polymorphonuclear leukocyte chemosensory movement behavior demand fundamental theoretical understanding. In uniform concentrations of chemoattractant, these cells exhibit a persistent random walk, with a characteristic "persistence time" between significant changes in direction. In chemoattractant concentration gradients, they demonstrate a biased random walk, with an "orientation bias" characterizing the fraction of cells moving up the gradient. A coherent picture of cell movement responses to chemoattractant requires that both the persistence time and the orientation bias be explained within a unifying framework. In this paper, we offer the possibility that "noise" in the cellular signal perception/response mechanism can simultaneously account for these two key phenomena. In particular, we develop a stochastic mathematical model for cell locomotion based on kinetic fluctuations in chemoattractant/receptor binding. This model can simulate cell paths similar to those observed experimentally, under conditions of uniform chemoattractant concentrations as well as chemoattractant concentration gradients. Furthermore, this model can quantitatively predict both cell persistence time and dependence of orientation bias on gradient size. Thus, the concept of signal "noise" can quantitatively unify the major characteristics of leukocyte random motility and chemotaxis. The same level of noise large enough to account for the observed frequency of turning in uniform environments is simultaneously small enough to allow for the observed degree of directional bias in gradients.

Citing Articles

An entropy-based approach for assessing the directional persistence of cell migration.

Liu Y, Jiao Y, Li X, Li G, Wang W, Liu Z Biophys J. 2024; 123(6):730-744.

PMID: 38366586 PMC: 10995411. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2024.02.010.


Adhesion tunes speed and persistence by coordinating protrusions and extracellular matrix remodeling.

Leineweber W, Fraley S Dev Cell. 2023; 58(15):1414-1428.e4.

PMID: 37321214 PMC: 10527808. DOI: 10.1016/j.devcel.2023.05.013.


Using Live-Cell Imaging and Synthetic Biology to Probe Directed Migration in .

Kuhn J, Lin Y, Devreotes P Front Cell Dev Biol. 2021; 9:740205.

PMID: 34676215 PMC: 8523838. DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2021.740205.


Emerging machine learning approaches to phenotyping cellular motility and morphodynamics.

Choi H, Wang C, Pan X, Jang J, Cao M, Brazzo 3rd J Phys Biol. 2021; 18(4).

PMID: 33971636 PMC: 9131244. DOI: 10.1088/1478-3975/abffbe.


MAPK activity dynamics regulate non-cell autonomous effects of oncogene expression.

Aikin T, Peterson A, Pokrass M, Clark H, Regot S Elife. 2020; 9.

PMID: 32940599 PMC: 7498266. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.60541.


References
1.
Ramsey W . Analysis of individual leucocyte behavior during chemotaxis. Exp Cell Res. 1972; 70(1):129-39. DOI: 10.1016/0014-4827(72)90190-5. View

2.
Allan R, Wilkinson P . A visual analysis of chemotactic and chemokinetic locomotion of human neutrophil leucocytes. Use of a new chemotaxis assay with Candida albicans as gradient source. Exp Cell Res. 1978; 111(1):191-203. DOI: 10.1016/0014-4827(78)90249-5. View

3.
Sullivan S, Zigmond S . Chemotactic peptide receptor modulation in polymorphonuclear leukocytes. J Cell Biol. 1980; 85(3):703-11. PMC: 2111466. DOI: 10.1083/jcb.85.3.703. View

4.
Delisi C, Marchetti F, Del Grosso G . A theory of measurement error and its implications for spatial and temporal gradient sensing during chemotaxis. Cell Biophys. 1982; 4(2-3):211-29. DOI: 10.1007/BF02918313. View

5.
Tranquillo R, Lauffenburger D . Stochastic model of leukocyte chemosensory movement. J Math Biol. 1987; 25(3):229-62. DOI: 10.1007/BF00276435. View