» Articles » PMID: 33971636

Emerging Machine Learning Approaches to Phenotyping Cellular Motility and Morphodynamics

Overview
Journal Phys Biol
Specialty Biochemistry
Date 2021 May 10
PMID 33971636
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Cells respond heterogeneously to molecular and environmental perturbations. Phenotypic heterogeneity, wherein multiple phenotypes coexist in the same conditions, presents challenges when interpreting the observed heterogeneity. Advances in live cell microscopy allow researchers to acquire an unprecedented amount of live cell image data at high spatiotemporal resolutions. Phenotyping cellular dynamics, however, is a nontrivial task and requires machine learning (ML) approaches to discern phenotypic heterogeneity from live cell images. In recent years, ML has proven instrumental in biomedical research, allowing scientists to implement sophisticated computation in which computers learn and effectively perform specific analyses with minimal human instruction or intervention. In this review, we discuss how ML has been recently employed in the study of cell motility and morphodynamics to identify phenotypes from computer vision analysis. We focus on new approaches to extract and learn meaningful spatiotemporal features from complex live cell images for cellular and subcellular phenotyping.

Citing Articles

Spatiotemporal feature learning for actin dynamics.

Saha S, Yang Q, Losert W, Morozov A, Sengupta A PLoS One. 2025; 20(3):e0318036.

PMID: 40043045 PMC: 11882080. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318036.


Interpretable Fine-Grained Phenotypes of Subcellular Dynamics via Unsupervised Deep Learning.

Wang C, Choi H, Woodbury L, Lee K Adv Sci (Weinh). 2024; 11(41):e2403547.

PMID: 39239705 PMC: 11538677. DOI: 10.1002/advs.202403547.


Methods and computational tools to study eukaryotic cell migration .

Toscano E, Cimmino E, Pennacchio F, Riccio P, Poli A, Liu Y Front Cell Dev Biol. 2024; 12:1385991.

PMID: 38887515 PMC: 11180820. DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2024.1385991.


Network representation of multicellular activity in pancreatic islets: Technical considerations for functional connectivity analysis.

Sterk M, Zhang Y, Pohorec V, Leitgeb E, Dolensek J, Benninger R PLoS Comput Biol. 2024; 20(5):e1012130.

PMID: 38739680 PMC: 11115366. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1012130.


Unsupervised Contour Tracking of Live Cells by Mechanical and Cycle Consistency Losses.

Jang J, Lee K, Kim T Proc IEEE Comput Soc Conf Comput Vis Pattern Recognit. 2024; 2023:227-236.

PMID: 38250674 PMC: 10798679. DOI: 10.1109/cvpr52729.2023.00030.


References
1.
Schoenauer Sebag A, Plancade S, Raulet-Tomkiewicz C, Barouki R, Vert J, Walter T . A generic methodological framework for studying single cell motility in high-throughput time-lapse data. Bioinformatics. 2015; 31(12):i320-8. PMC: 4765885. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv225. View

2.
Fang Y . Combining label-free cell phenotypic profiling with computational approaches for novel drug discovery. Expert Opin Drug Discov. 2015; 10(4):331-43. DOI: 10.1517/17460441.2015.1020788. View

3.
Ma X, Dagliyan O, Hahn K, Danuser G . Profiling cellular morphodynamics by spatiotemporal spectrum decomposition. PLoS Comput Biol. 2018; 14(8):e1006321. PMC: 6091976. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006321. View

4.
Lee G, Kenny P, Lee E, Bissell M . Three-dimensional culture models of normal and malignant breast epithelial cells. Nat Methods. 2007; 4(4):359-65. PMC: 2933182. DOI: 10.1038/nmeth1015. View

5.
Savage N . How AI and neuroscience drive each other forwards. Nature. 2019; 571(7766):S15-S17. DOI: 10.1038/d41586-019-02212-4. View