» Articles » PMID: 33365139

Advances and Prospects in Biomimetic Multilayered Scaffolds for Articular Cartilage Regeneration

Overview
Journal Regen Biomater
Date 2020 Dec 28
PMID 33365139
Citations 22
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Due to the sophisticated hierarchical structure and limited reparability of articular cartilage (AC), the ideal regeneration of AC defects has been a major challenge in the field of regenerative medicine. As defects progress, they often extend from the cartilage layer to the subchondral bone and ultimately lead to osteoarthritis. Tissue engineering techniques bring new hope for AC regeneration. To meet the regenerative requirements of the heterogeneous and layered structure of native AC tissue, a substantial number of multilayered biomimetic scaffolds have been studied. Ideal multilayered scaffolds should generate zone-specific functional tissue similar to native AC tissue. This review focuses on the current status of multilayered scaffolds developed for AC defect repair, including design strategies based on the degree of defect severity and the zone-specific characteristics of AC tissue, the selection and composition of biomaterials, and techniques for design and manufacturing. The challenges and future perspectives of biomimetic multilayered scaffold strategies for AC regeneration are also discussed.

Citing Articles

Injectable Thermosensitive Thiol-Modified NIPAAm--Chitosan Hydrogels for Cartilage Regeneration in a Rabbit Osteoarthritis Model.

Ching P, Chang Y, Weng C, Wang J, Yeh M ACS Omega. 2025; 10(8):8523-8537.

PMID: 40060830 PMC: 11886913. DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.4c10829.


Three-Dimensional-Printed Osteochondral Scaffold with Biomimetic Surface Curvature for Osteochondral Regeneration.

Yang Y, Lin Q, Hou Z, Yang G, Shen L Pharmaceutics. 2025; 17(2).

PMID: 40006520 PMC: 11859329. DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics17020153.


Modern Approach to Testing the Biocompatibility of Osteochondral Scaffolds in Accordance with the 3Rs Principle─Preclinical , , and Studies Using the Biphasic Curdlan-Based Biomaterial.

Klimek K, Terpilowska S, Michalak A, Bernacki R, Nurzynska A, Cucchiarini M ACS Biomater Sci Eng. 2025; 11(2):845-865.

PMID: 39832791 PMC: 11815629. DOI: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.4c01107.


Scaffold design considerations for peripheral nerve regeneration.

Yu L, Bennett C, Lin C, Yan S, Yang J J Neural Eng. 2024; 21(4).

PMID: 38996412 PMC: 11883895. DOI: 10.1088/1741-2552/ad628d.


A 4D printed self-assembling PEGDA microscaffold fabricated by digital light processing for arthroscopic articular cartilage tissue engineering.

Hao Y, Wu C, Su Y, Curran J, Henstock J, Tseng F Prog Addit Manuf. 2024; 9(1):3-14.

PMID: 38333227 PMC: 10851926. DOI: 10.1007/s40964-022-00360-0.


References
1.
Raghunath J, Rollo J, Sales K, Butler P, Seifalian A . Biomaterials and scaffold design: key to tissue-engineering cartilage. Biotechnol Appl Biochem. 2007; 46(Pt 2):73-84. DOI: 10.1042/BA20060134. View

2.
Siddiqui N, Asawa S, Birru B, Baadhe R, Rao S . PCL-Based Composite Scaffold Matrices for Tissue Engineering Applications. Mol Biotechnol. 2018; 60(7):506-532. DOI: 10.1007/s12033-018-0084-5. View

3.
Del Bakhshayesh A, Asadi N, Alihemmati A, Nasrabadi H, Montaseri A, Davaran S . An overview of advanced biocompatible and biomimetic materials for creation of replacement structures in the musculoskeletal systems: focusing on cartilage tissue engineering. J Biol Eng. 2019; 13:85. PMC: 6854707. DOI: 10.1186/s13036-019-0209-9. View

4.
Hu X, Xu J, Li W, Li L, Parungao R, Wang Y . Therapeutic "Tool" in Reconstruction and Regeneration of Tissue Engineering for Osteochondral Repair. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2019; 191(2):785-809. DOI: 10.1007/s12010-019-03214-8. View

5.
Jia S, Wang J, Zhang T, Pan W, Li Z, He X . Multilayered Scaffold with a Compact Interfacial Layer Enhances Osteochondral Defect Repair. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2018; 10(24):20296-20305. DOI: 10.1021/acsami.8b03445. View