» Articles » PMID: 28413859

Meniscus, Articular Cartilage and Nucleus Pulposus: a Comparative Review of Cartilage-like Tissues in Anatomy, Development and Function

Overview
Journal Cell Tissue Res
Date 2017 Apr 18
PMID 28413859
Citations 70
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The degradation of cartilage in the human body is impacted by aging, disease, genetic predisposition and continued insults resulting from daily activity. The burden of cartilage defects (osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, intervertebral disc damage, knee replacement surgeries, etc.) is daunting in light of substantial economic and social stresses. This review strives to broaden the scope of regenerative medicine and tissue engineering approaches used for cartilage repair by comparing and contrasting the anatomical and functional nature of the meniscus, articular cartilage (AC) and nucleus pulposus (NP). Many review papers have provided detailed evaluations of these cartilages and cartilage-like tissues individually but none have comprehensively examined the parallels and inconsistencies in signaling, genetic expression and extracellular matrix composition between tissues. For the first time, this review outlines the importance of understanding these three tissues as unique entities, providing a comparative analysis of anatomy, ultrastructure, biochemistry and function for each tissue. This novel approach highlights the similarities and differences between tissues, progressing research toward an understanding of what defines each tissue as distinctive. The goal of this paper is to provide researchers with the fundamental knowledge to correctly engineer the meniscus, AC and NP without inadvertently developing the wrong tissue function or biochemistry.

Citing Articles

Therapeutic potential of targeting the IRF2/POSTN/Notch1 axis in nucleus pulposus cells for intervertebral disc degeneration.

Zhu D, Wang Z, Chen S, Li Y, Kang X J Neuroinflammation. 2025; 22(1):13.

PMID: 39844302 PMC: 11755837. DOI: 10.1186/s12974-025-03335-4.


Histological Evaluation of the Effects of Intra-Articular Injection of Caffeic Acid on Cartilage Repair in a Rat Knee Microfracture Model.

Serpi M, Adas M, Cumbul A, Cakar M, Demirkale I Med Sci Monit. 2024; 30:e946845.

PMID: 39639547 PMC: 11629585. DOI: 10.12659/MSM.946845.


Diacetoxy-6-gingerdiol protects the extracellular matrix of nucleus pulposus cells and ameliorates intervertebral disc degeneration by inhibiting the IL-1β-mediated NLRP3 pathway.

Xi H, Weng Y, Zheng Y, Wu L, Han D Heliyon. 2024; 10(21):e37877.

PMID: 39568855 PMC: 11577133. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e37877.


Tissue engineering strategies hold promise for the repair of articular cartilage injury.

Yang C, Chen R, Chen C, Yang F, Xiao H, Geng B Biomed Eng Online. 2024; 23(1):92.

PMID: 39261876 PMC: 11389311. DOI: 10.1186/s12938-024-01260-w.


Biomolecular therapies for chronic discogenic low back pain: A narrative review.

Rudnik-Jansen I, van Kruining Kodele S, Creemers L, Joosten B JOR Spine. 2024; 7(3):e1345.

PMID: 39114580 PMC: 11303450. DOI: 10.1002/jsp2.1345.


References
1.
Aigner T, Gebhard P, Schmid E, Bau B, Harley V, Poschl E . SOX9 expression does not correlate with type II collagen expression in adult articular chondrocytes. Matrix Biol. 2003; 22(4):363-72. DOI: 10.1016/s0945-053x(03)00049-0. View

2.
Renstrom P, Johnson R . Anatomy and biomechanics of the menisci. Clin Sports Med. 1990; 9(3):523-38. View

3.
Ochi K, Daigo Y, Katagiri T, Saito-Hisaminato A, Tsunoda T, Toyama Y . Expression profiles of two types of human knee-joint cartilage. J Hum Genet. 2003; 48(4):177-82. DOI: 10.1007/s10038-003-0004-8. View

4.
Hunter C, Matyas J, Duncan N . The notochordal cell in the nucleus pulposus: a review in the context of tissue engineering. Tissue Eng. 2003; 9(4):667-77. DOI: 10.1089/107632703768247368. View

5.
Hunziker E . Articular cartilage repair: basic science and clinical progress. A review of the current status and prospects. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2002; 10(6):432-63. DOI: 10.1053/joca.2002.0801. View