» Articles » PMID: 33233782

Critical Analysis of Pork QMRA Focusing on Slaughterhouses: Lessons from the Past and Future Trends

Overview
Journal Foods
Specialty Biotechnology
Date 2020 Nov 25
PMID 33233782
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Foodborne microbial diseases have a significant impact on public health, leading to millions of human illnesses each year worldwide. Pork is one of the most consumed meat in Europe but may also be a major source of pathogens introduced all along the farm-to-fork chain. Several quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA) have been developed to assess human health risks associated with pork consumption and to evaluate the efficiency of different risk reduction strategies. The present critical analysis aims to review pork QMRA. An exhaustive search was conducted following the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) methodology. It resulted in identification of a collection of 2489 papers including 42 on QMRA, after screening. Among them, a total of 29 studies focused on spp. with clear concern on impacts at the slaughterhouse, modeling the spreading of contaminations and growth at critical stages along with potential reductions. Along with strict compliance with good hygiene practices, several potential risk mitigation pathways were highlighted for each slaughterhouse step. The slaughterhouse has a key role to play to ensure food safety of pork-based products but consideration of the whole farm-to-fork chain is necessary to enable better control of bacteria. This review provides an analysis of pork meat QMRA, to facilitate their reuse, and identify gaps to guide future research activities.

Citing Articles

Quantitative risk assessments of Salmonella spp. in domestic pork in China.

Zhong J, Zhou G, Yang Y, Sun X, Zhang H, Qu X Braz J Microbiol. 2024; 55(1):681-688.

PMID: 38175356 PMC: 10920572. DOI: 10.1007/s42770-023-01220-x.


Meat safety legislation and its opportunities and hurdles for innovative approaches: A review.

Nagel-Alne G, Murphy E, McCauslin B, Hauge S, Schroder-Petersen D, Holthe J Food Control. 2022; 141:109160.

PMID: 36329973 PMC: 9290325. DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2022.109160.

References
1.
Condoleo R, Rinaldi L, Sette S, Mezher Z . Risk Assessment of Human Toxoplasmosis Associated with the Consumption of Pork Meat in Italy. Risk Anal. 2017; 38(6):1202-1222. DOI: 10.1111/risa.12934. View

2.
Bollaerts K, Messens W, Delhalle L, Aerts M, Van der Stede Y, Dewulf J . Development of a quantitative microbial risk assessment for human salmonellosis through household consumption of fresh minced pork meat in Belgium. Risk Anal. 2009; 29(6):820-40. DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2009.01223.x. View

3.
Chokesajjawatee N, Pornaem S, Zo Y, Kamdee S, Luxananil P, Wanasen S . Incidence of Staphylococcus aureus and associated risk factors in Nham, a Thai fermented pork product. Food Microbiol. 2009; 26(5):547-51. DOI: 10.1016/j.fm.2009.02.009. View

4.
Hill A, Simons R, Kelly L, Snary E . A Farm Transmission Model for Salmonella in Pigs, Applicable to E.U. Member States. Risk Anal. 2015; 36(3):461-81. DOI: 10.1111/risa.12356. View

5.
Delhalle L, Saegerman C, Messens W, Farnir F, Korsak N, Van der Stede Y . Assessing interventions by quantitative risk assessment tools to reduce the risk of human salmonellosis from fresh minced pork meat in Belgium. J Food Prot. 2009; 72(11):2252-63. DOI: 10.4315/0362-028x-72.11.2252. View