» Articles » PMID: 36329973

Meat Safety Legislation and Its Opportunities and Hurdles for Innovative Approaches: A Review

Overview
Journal Food Control
Date 2022 Nov 4
PMID 36329973
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Albert Einstein has been quoted "We cannot solve our problems with the same thinking we used when we created them". Innovations are necessary to meet future challenges regarding sustainability, animal welfare, slaughter hygiene, meat safety and quality, not at least for optimal balance between these dimensions. The red meat safety legislation texts from Europe, New Zealand, USA, and global guidelines, were analysed for normative formulations ("how it is or should be done") that may create non-intentional hurdles to innovation and new technology. Detailed descriptions of slaughtering techniques and meat processes may hinder innovative processing from being investigated and implemented. The identified problematic normative phrases typically either conserve conventional technologies or organisation of the work, prescribe solutions where no established method, objective criteria or limits exits, or put forward visions impossible to obtain. The Codex Alimentarius was found to have less normative formulations and more functional demands ("what to achieve") than the national and regional regulations. European, New Zealand's and US' legislation share many similarities and challenges, and they all reflect the prevailing processing methods. Consequences are briefly commented, and alternative objective functional demands suggested. Normative legislation texts provide familiar context easier to understand, but also make legislation voluminous. This review underlines the mutual dependency between risk-based legislation and conditional flexibility, and between functional demands and control activities targeted on measurable objective criteria. The legislation does not have to be either or. Objective normative phrases in legislation can function as a least common multiple if alternative methods are allowed on condition that they fulfil objective criteria. Context and practical advice should mainly come from textbooks, consultants, white papers and in Food Business Operator's own guidelines, among others.

Citing Articles

Assessment of HACCP plans and Colombian regulations in municipal cattle slaughterhouses for the assurance of standardised food safety and quality management systems.

Solanilla-Duque J, Morales-Velasco S, Salazar-Sanchez M Heliyon. 2025; 10(24):e40944.

PMID: 39759306 PMC: 11698929. DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e40944.


Steps towards operationalizing One Health approaches.

Pepin K, Carlisle K, Anderson D, Baker M, Chipman R, Benschop J One Health. 2024; 18:100740.

PMID: 38707934 PMC: 11067352. DOI: 10.1016/j.onehlt.2024.100740.


Opportunities for Regulatory Authorities to Assess Animal-Based Measures at the Slaughterhouse Using Sensor Technology and Artificial Intelligence: A Review.

Voogt A, Schrijver R, Temurhan M, Bongers J, Sijm D Animals (Basel). 2023; 13(19).

PMID: 37835634 PMC: 10571985. DOI: 10.3390/ani13193028.


Basic Hazard Control Plan for Small Wild Ungulates Slaughtered for Meat Production.

Nkosi D, Bekker J, Hoffman L Foods. 2023; 12(7).

PMID: 37048332 PMC: 10094352. DOI: 10.3390/foods12071511.


Robot Technology for Pork and Beef Meat Slaughtering Process: A Review.

Kim J, Kwon Y, Kim H, Seol K, Cho B Animals (Basel). 2023; 13(4).

PMID: 36830438 PMC: 9951719. DOI: 10.3390/ani13040651.

References
1.
Gill C, Penney N, Nottingham P . Tissue sterility in uneviscerated carcasses. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1978; 36(2):356-9. PMC: 291225. DOI: 10.1128/aem.36.2.356-359.1978. View

2.
Piccoli B, Soci G, Zambelli P, Pisaniello D . Photometry in the workplace: the rationale for a new method. Ann Occup Hyg. 2004; 48(1):29-38. DOI: 10.1093/annhyg/meg076. View

3.
Bohaychuk V, Checkley S, Gensler G, Barrios P . Microbiological baseline study of poultry slaughtered in provincially inspected abattoirs in Alberta, Canada. Can Vet J. 2009; 50(2):173-8. PMC: 2629421. View

4.
Hassan A, Skjerve E, Bergh C, Nesbakken T . Microbial effect of steam vacuum pasteurisation implemented after slaughtering and dressing of sheep and lamb. Meat Sci. 2014; 99:32-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2014.08.007. View

5.
Barbut S . Meat Industry 4.0: A Distant Future?. Anim Front. 2020; 10(4):38-47. PMC: 7596804. DOI: 10.1093/af/vfaa038. View