» Articles » PMID: 33203707

Plasma Vitamin C and Type 2 Diabetes: Genome-Wide Association Study and Mendelian Randomization Analysis in European Populations

Abstract

Objective: Higher plasma vitamin C levels are associated with lower type 2 diabetes risk, but whether this association is causal is uncertain. To investigate this, we studied the association of genetically predicted plasma vitamin C with type 2 diabetes.

Research Design And Methods: We conducted genome-wide association studies of plasma vitamin C among 52,018 individuals of European ancestry to discover novel genetic variants. We performed Mendelian randomization analyses to estimate the association of genetically predicted differences in plasma vitamin C with type 2 diabetes in up to 80,983 case participants and 842,909 noncase participants. We compared this estimate with the observational association between plasma vitamin C and incident type 2 diabetes, including 8,133 case participants and 11,073 noncase participants.

Results: We identified 11 genomic regions associated with plasma vitamin C ( < 5 × 10), with the strongest signal at , and 10 novel genetic loci including , , , , , , , , , and . Plasma vitamin C was inversely associated with type 2 diabetes (hazard ratio per SD 0.88; 95% CI 0.82, 0.94), but there was no association between genetically predicted plasma vitamin C (excluding variant due to its apparent pleiotropic effect) and type 2 diabetes (1.03; 95% CI 0.96, 1.10).

Conclusions: These findings indicate discordance between biochemically measured and genetically predicted plasma vitamin C levels in the association with type 2 diabetes among European populations. The null Mendelian randomization findings provide no strong evidence to suggest the use of vitamin C supplementation for type 2 diabetes prevention.

Citing Articles

Vitamin C: From Self-Sufficiency to Dietary Dependence in the Framework of Its Biological Functions and Medical Implications.

Gradinaru A, Popa S Life (Basel). 2025; 15(2).

PMID: 40003647 PMC: 11856994. DOI: 10.3390/life15020238.


Dietary factors and the risk of gastric and colorectal cancers: A Mendelian randomization study.

Zhang Y, Xia H, Yang S, Yu W, Liu M, Li D Medicine (Baltimore). 2025; 104(7):e41610.

PMID: 39960923 PMC: 11835071. DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000041610.


Genetically Supported Causality Between Micronutrients and Sleep Behaviors: A Two-Sample Mendelian Randomization Study.

Zhang R, Luo L, Zhang L, Lin X, Wu C, Jiang F Brain Behav. 2025; 15(2):e70237.

PMID: 39910798 PMC: 11799067. DOI: 10.1002/brb3.70237.


Understanding the Genetic Architecture of Vitamin Status Biomarkers in the Genome-Wide Association Study Era: Biological Insights and Clinical Significance.

Reay W, Clarke E, Albinana C, Hwang L Adv Nutr. 2024; 15(12):100344.

PMID: 39551434 PMC: 11653147. DOI: 10.1016/j.advnut.2024.100344.


Micronutrients and Major Depression: A Mendelian Randomisation Study.

Carnegie R, Zheng J, Borges M, Jones H, Wade K, Sallis H Nutrients. 2024; 16(21).

PMID: 39519523 PMC: 11547740. DOI: 10.3390/nu16213690.


References
1.
Burgess S, Butterworth A, Thompson S . Mendelian randomization analysis with multiple genetic variants using summarized data. Genet Epidemiol. 2013; 37(7):658-65. PMC: 4377079. DOI: 10.1002/gepi.21758. View

2.
Didelez V, Sheehan N . Mendelian randomization as an instrumental variable approach to causal inference. Stat Methods Med Res. 2007; 16(4):309-30. DOI: 10.1177/0962280206077743. View

3.
Day N, Oakes S, Luben R, Khaw K, Bingham S, Welch A . EPIC-Norfolk: study design and characteristics of the cohort. European Prospective Investigation of Cancer. Br J Cancer. 1999; 80 Suppl 1:95-103. View

4.
Karlsen A, Blomhoff R, Gundersen T . High-throughput analysis of vitamin C in human plasma with the use of HPLC with monolithic column and UV-detection. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2005; 824(1-2):132-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jchromb.2005.07.008. View

5.
Lawlor D, Davey Smith G, Kundu D, Bruckdorfer K, Ebrahim S . Those confounded vitamins: what can we learn from the differences between observational versus randomised trial evidence?. Lancet. 2004; 363(9422):1724-7. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16260-0. View