» Articles » PMID: 33123683

Recent Progress of Biomarker Detection Sensors

Overview
Specialty Biology
Date 2020 Oct 30
PMID 33123683
Citations 28
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Early cancer diagnosis and treatment are crucial research fields of human health. One method that has proven efficient is biomarker detection which can provide real-time and accurate biological information for early diagnosis. This review presents several biomarker sensors based on electrochemistry, surface plasmon resonance (SPR), nanowires, other nanostructures, and, most recently, metamaterials which have also shown their mechanisms and prospects in application in recent years. Compared with previous reviews, electrochemistry-based biomarker sensors have been classified into three strategies according to their optimizing methods in this review. This makes it more convenient for researchers to find a specific fabrication method to improve the performance of their sensors. Besides that, as microfabrication technologies have improved and novel materials are explored, some novel biomarker sensors-such as nanowire-based and metamaterial-based biomarker sensors-have also been investigated and summarized in this review, which can exhibit ultrahigh resolution, sensitivity, and limit of detection (LoD) in a more complex detection environment. The purpose of this review is to understand the present by reviewing the past. Researchers can break through bottlenecks of existing biomarker sensors by reviewing previous works and finally meet the various complex detection needs for the early diagnosis of human cancer.

Citing Articles

Nanozyme-Based Strategies against Bone Infection.

Li Z, Jia G, Su Z, Zhu C Research (Wash D C). 2025; 8:0605.

PMID: 39935691 PMC: 11811343. DOI: 10.34133/research.0605.


Smart Contact Lenses: Disease Monitoring and Treatment.

Pan M, Zhang Z, Shang L Research (Wash D C). 2025; 8:0611.

PMID: 39931295 PMC: 11808174. DOI: 10.34133/research.0611.


Noninvasive Detection of Alpha-Amylase in Saliva Using Screen-Printed Carbon Electrodes: A Promising Biomarker for Clinical Oral Diagnostics.

Reviansyah F, Ristin A, Rauf A, Sepirasari P, Alim F, Nur Y Med Devices (Auckl). 2025; 18():15-27.

PMID: 39801672 PMC: 11724623. DOI: 10.2147/MDER.S493383.


Mutual information for detecting multi-class biomarkers when integrating multiple bulk or single-cell transcriptomic studies.

Zou J, Li Z, Carleton N, Oesterreich S, Lee A, Tseng G Bioinformatics. 2024; 40(12).

PMID: 39563471 PMC: 11629966. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btae696.


Hybrid Polystyrene-Plasmonic Systems as High Binding Density Biosensing Platforms.

Darr C, Hasan J, Mathai C, Gangopadhyay K, Gangopadhyay S, Bok S Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(16).

PMID: 39201289 PMC: 11354982. DOI: 10.3390/ijms25168603.


References
1.
Kuo Y, Lee C, Lin C . Improving sensitivity of a miniaturized label-free electrochemical biosensor using zigzag electrodes. Biosens Bioelectron. 2018; 103:130-137. DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2017.11.065. View

2.
Jie G, Liu P, Zhang S . Highly enhanced electrochemiluminescence of novel gold/silica/CdSe-CdS nanostructures for ultrasensitive immunoassay of protein tumor marker. Chem Commun (Camb). 2010; 46(8):1323-5. DOI: 10.1039/b919186k. View

3.
Aydin M . A sensitive and selective approach for detection of IL 1α cancer biomarker using disposable ITO electrode modified with epoxy-substituted polythiophene polymer. Biosens Bioelectron. 2019; 144:111675. DOI: 10.1016/j.bios.2019.111675. View

4.
Wang J . Nanomaterial-based electrochemical biosensors. Analyst. 2005; 130(4):421-6. DOI: 10.1039/b414248a. View

5.
Oh B, Lee W, Kim Y, Lee W, Choi J . Surface plasmon resonance immunosensor using self-assembled protein G for the detection of Salmonella paratyphi. J Biotechnol. 2004; 111(1):1-8. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiotec.2004.02.010. View