» Articles » PMID: 32882403

The Gustatory Sensory G-Protein GNAT3 Suppresses Pancreatic Cancer Progression in Mice

Abstract

Background & Aims: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) initiation and progression are accompanied by an immunosuppressive inflammatory response. Here, we evaluated the immunomodulatory role of chemosensory signaling in metaplastic tuft cells (MTCs) by analyzing the role of GNAT3, a gustatory pathway G-protein expressed by MTCs, during PDA progression.

Methods: Gnat3-null (Gnat3) mice were crossbred with animals harboring a Cre-inducible Kras allele with either Ptf1a (KC) or tamoxifen-inducible Ptf1a (KC) mice to drive oncogenic KRAS expression in the pancreas. Ex vivo organoid conditioned medium generated from KC and Gnat3;KC acinar cells was analyzed for cytokine secretion. Experimental pancreatitis was induced in KC and Gnat3;KC mice to accelerate tumorigenesis, followed by analysis using mass cytometry and single-cell RNA sequencing. To study PDA progression, KC and Gnat3;KC mice were aged to morbidity or 52 weeks.

Results: Ablation of Gnat3 in KC organoids increased release of tumor-promoting cytokines in conditioned media, including CXCL1 and CXCL2. Analysis of Gnat3;KC pancreata found altered expression of immunomodulatory genes in Cxcr2 expressing myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) and an increased number of granulocytic MDSCs, a subset of tumor promoting MDSCs. Importantly, expression levels of CXCL1 and CXCL2, known ligands for CXCR2, were also elevated in Gnat3;KC pancreata. Consistent with the tumor-promoting role of MDSCs, aged Gnat3;KC mice progressed more rapidly to metastatic carcinoma compared with KC controls.

Conclusions: Compromised gustatory sensing, achieved by Gnat3 ablation, enhanced the CXCL1/2-CXCR2 axis to alter the MDSC population and promoted the progression of metastatic PDA.

Citing Articles

Short histological kaleidoscope - recent findings in histology. Part IV.

Sufletel R, Mihu C, Bosca A, Melincovici C, Marginean M, Jianu E Rom J Morphol Embryol. 2024; 65(3):377-393.

PMID: 39529332 PMC: 11657374. DOI: 10.47162/RJME.65.3.01.


Tuft cells transdifferentiate to neural-like progenitor cells in the progression of pancreatic cancer.

Salas-Escabillas D, Hoffman M, Moore J, Brender S, Wen H, Benitz S bioRxiv. 2024; .

PMID: 38405804 PMC: 10888969. DOI: 10.1101/2024.02.12.579982.


Possible connection between intestinal tuft cells, ILC2s and obesity.

Yang H, Huang Y, Xiong P, Li J, Chen J, Liu X Front Immunol. 2024; 14:1266667.

PMID: 38283340 PMC: 10811205. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1266667.


Dynamic tuft cell expansion during gastric metaplasia and dysplasia.

Jang B, Kim H, Lee S, Won Y, Kaji I, Coffey R J Pathol Clin Res. 2023; 10(1):e352.

PMID: 38117182 PMC: 10766036. DOI: 10.1002/cjp2.352.


Tumor Microenvironment Responsive CD8 T Cells and Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells to Trigger CD73 Inhibitor AB680-Based Synergistic Therapy for Pancreatic Cancer.

Chen Q, Yin H, He J, Xie Y, Wang W, Xu H Adv Sci (Weinh). 2023; 10(33):e2302498.

PMID: 37867243 PMC: 10667825. DOI: 10.1002/advs.202302498.


References
1.
Ibrahim H, Matsuzaki T, Aoki T . Genetic evidence that antibacterial activity of lysozyme is independent of its catalytic function. FEBS Lett. 2001; 506(1):27-32. DOI: 10.1016/s0014-5793(01)02872-1. View

2.
Werner J, Combs S, Springfeld C, Hartwig W, Hackert T, Buchler M . Advanced-stage pancreatic cancer: therapy options. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2013; 10(6):323-33. DOI: 10.1038/nrclinonc.2013.66. View

3.
Ohlund D, Handly-Santana A, Biffi G, Elyada E, Almeida A, Ponz-Sarvise M . Distinct populations of inflammatory fibroblasts and myofibroblasts in pancreatic cancer. J Exp Med. 2017; 214(3):579-596. PMC: 5339682. DOI: 10.1084/jem.20162024. View

4.
Ting H, von Moltke J . The Immune Function of Tuft Cells at Gut Mucosal Surfaces and Beyond. J Immunol. 2019; 202(5):1321-1329. PMC: 6383804. DOI: 10.4049/jimmunol.1801069. View

5.
Gulbransen B, Clapp T, Finger T, Kinnamon S . Nasal solitary chemoreceptor cell responses to bitter and trigeminal stimulants in vitro. J Neurophysiol. 2008; 99(6):2929-37. PMC: 2765583. DOI: 10.1152/jn.00066.2008. View