» Articles » PMID: 32766800

Association of Sex, Age, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status With Survival Benefit of Cancer Immunotherapy in Randomized Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Abstract

Importance: Sex, age, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) may affect immune response. However, the association of these factors with the survival benefit of cancer immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) remains unclear.

Objective: To assess the potential sex, age, and ECOG PS differences of immunotherapy survival benefit in patients with advanced cancer.

Data Sources: PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Scopus were searched from inception to August 31, 2019.

Study Selection: Published randomized clinical trials comparing overall survival (OS) in patients with advanced cancer treated with ICI immunotherapy vs non-ICI control therapy were included.

Data Extraction And Synthesis: Pooled OS hazard ratio (HR) and 95% CI for patients of different sex, age (<65 and ≥65 years) or ECOG PS (0 and ≥1) were calculated separately using a random-effects model, and the heterogeneity between paired estimates was assessed using an interaction test by pooling study-specific interaction HRs. This study followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guideline.

Main Outcomes And Measures: The difference in survival benefit of ICIs between sex, age (<65 vs ≥65 years), and ECOG PS (0 vs ≥1), as well as the difference stratified by cancer type, line of therapy, agent of immunotherapy, and immunotherapy strategy in the intervention arm.

Results: Thirty-seven phase 2 or 3 randomized clinical trials involving 23 760 patients were included. An OS benefit of immunotherapy was found for both men (HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.71-0.81) and women (HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.72-0.88); for both younger (<65 years: HR, 0.77; 95% CI, 0.71-0.83) and older (≥65 years: HR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.72-0.84) patients; and for both patients with ECOG PS 0 (HR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.73-0.90) and PS greater than or equal to 1 (HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.74-0.84). No significant difference of relative benefit from immunotherapy over control therapy was found in patients of different sex (P = .25, I2 = 19.02%), age (P = .94, I2 = 15.57%), or ECOG PS (P = .74, I2 = 0%). No significant difference was found in subgroup analyses by cancer type, line of therapy, agent of immunotherapy, and immunotherapy strategy in the intervention arm.

Conclusions And Relevance: This meta-analysis found no evidence of an association of sex, age (<65 vs ≥65 years), or ECOG PS (0 vs ≥1) with cancer immunotherapy survival benefit. This finding suggests that the use of ICIs in advanced cancer should not be restricted to certain patients in sex, age, or ECOG PS categories.

Citing Articles

Sex differences in the pharmacokinetics of anticancer drugs: a systematic review.

Delahousse J, Wagner A, Borchmann S, Adjei A, Haanen J, Burgers F ESMO Open. 2024; 9(12):104002.

PMID: 39662226 PMC: 11697095. DOI: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2024.104002.


A comprehensive investigation of associations between cell death pathways and molecular and clinical features in pan-cancer.

He Y, Wang X Clin Transl Oncol. 2024; .

PMID: 39487950 DOI: 10.1007/s12094-024-03769-x.


The prevalence and prognostic value of systemic inflammation in good performance status patients with advanced, inoperable non-small cell lung cancer receiving palliative radiotherapy: Comparison of composite ratios and cumulative scores.

McGovern J, ORourke F, Will S, Nguyen H, Cranfield E, Maseland C Cancer Med. 2024; 13(16):e70139.

PMID: 39164973 PMC: 11335809. DOI: 10.1002/cam4.70139.


Outcome differences by sex in oncology clinical trials.

Kammula A, Schaffer A, Rajagopal P, Kurzrock R, Ruppin E Nat Commun. 2024; 15(1):2608.

PMID: 38521835 PMC: 10960820. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-46945-x.


Non-tumor-related prognostic factors for immunotherapy-chemotherapy or immunotherapy alone as first-line in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Guo Z, Wei X, Tang C, Liang J Clin Exp Med. 2024; 24(1):52.

PMID: 38489142 PMC: 10942875. DOI: 10.1007/s10238-024-01298-z.


References
1.
Ribas A, Kefford R, Marshall M, Punt C, Haanen J, Marmol M . Phase III randomized clinical trial comparing tremelimumab with standard-of-care chemotherapy in patients with advanced melanoma. J Clin Oncol. 2013; 31(5):616-22. PMC: 4878048. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2012.44.6112. View

2.
Kasherman L, Siu D, Lee K, Lord S, Marschner I, Lewis C . Efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in older adults with advanced stage cancers: A meta-analysis. J Geriatr Oncol. 2019; 11(3):508-514. DOI: 10.1016/j.jgo.2019.05.013. View

3.
Robert C, Long G, Brady B, Dutriaux C, Maio M, Mortier L . Nivolumab in previously untreated melanoma without BRAF mutation. N Engl J Med. 2014; 372(4):320-30. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1412082. View

4.
Larkin J, Minor D, DAngelo S, Neyns B, Smylie M, Miller Jr W . Overall Survival in Patients With Advanced Melanoma Who Received Nivolumab Versus Investigator's Choice Chemotherapy in CheckMate 037: A Randomized, Controlled, Open-Label Phase III Trial. J Clin Oncol. 2017; 36(4):383-390. PMC: 6804912. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2016.71.8023. View

5.
Rini B, Plimack E, Stus V, Gafanov R, Hawkins R, Nosov D . Pembrolizumab plus Axitinib versus Sunitinib for Advanced Renal-Cell Carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2019; 380(12):1116-1127. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1816714. View