» Articles » PMID: 29562145

Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab Versus Sunitinib in Advanced Renal-Cell Carcinoma

Abstract

Background: Nivolumab plus ipilimumab produced objective responses in patients with advanced renal-cell carcinoma in a pilot study. This phase 3 trial compared nivolumab plus ipilimumab with sunitinib for previously untreated clear-cell advanced renal-cell carcinoma.

Methods: We randomly assigned adults in a 1:1 ratio to receive either nivolumab (3 mg per kilogram of body weight) plus ipilimumab (1 mg per kilogram) intravenously every 3 weeks for four doses, followed by nivolumab (3 mg per kilogram) every 2 weeks, or sunitinib (50 mg) orally once daily for 4 weeks (6-week cycle). The coprimary end points were overall survival (alpha level, 0.04), objective response rate (alpha level, 0.001), and progression-free survival (alpha level, 0.009) among patients with intermediate or poor prognostic risk.

Results: A total of 1096 patients were assigned to receive nivolumab plus ipilimumab (550 patients) or sunitinib (546 patients); 425 and 422, respectively, had intermediate or poor risk. At a median follow-up of 25.2 months in intermediate- and poor-risk patients, the 18-month overall survival rate was 75% (95% confidence interval [CI], 70 to 78) with nivolumab plus ipilimumab and 60% (95% CI, 55 to 65) with sunitinib; the median overall survival was not reached with nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus 26.0 months with sunitinib (hazard ratio for death, 0.63; P<0.001). The objective response rate was 42% versus 27% (P<0.001), and the complete response rate was 9% versus 1%. The median progression-free survival was 11.6 months and 8.4 months, respectively (hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.82; P=0.03, not significant per the prespecified 0.009 threshold). Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 509 of 547 patients (93%) in the nivolumab-plus-ipilimumab group and 521 of 535 patients (97%) in the sunitinib group; grade 3 or 4 events occurred in 250 patients (46%) and 335 patients (63%), respectively. Treatment-related adverse events leading to discontinuation occurred in 22% and 12% of the patients in the respective groups.

Conclusions: Overall survival and objective response rates were significantly higher with nivolumab plus ipilimumab than with sunitinib among intermediate- and poor-risk patients with previously untreated advanced renal-cell carcinoma. (Funded by Bristol-Myers Squibb and Ono Pharmaceutical; CheckMate 214 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02231749 .).

Citing Articles

ZEB1 promotes the immune escape of ovarian cancer through the MCSF-CCL18 axis.

Jin Y, Li G, Xu Q, Wang X Cancer Cell Int. 2025; 25(1):95.

PMID: 40089803 DOI: 10.1186/s12935-025-03724-y.


Targeting Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Beyond PD-1/PD-L1 Monoclonal Antibodies.

Roussot N, Kaderbhai C, Ghiringhelli F Cancers (Basel). 2025; 17(5).

PMID: 40075753 PMC: 11898530. DOI: 10.3390/cancers17050906.


Evaluating Therapeutic Efficacy of the Vascular Disrupting Agent OXi8007 Against Kidney Cancer in Mice.

Wanniarachchi H, Schuetze R, Deng Y, Hamal K, Pavlich C, Tankoano P Cancers (Basel). 2025; 17(5).

PMID: 40075618 PMC: 11898701. DOI: 10.3390/cancers17050771.


Incidence and management of hepatic immune‑related adverse events in advanced urologic cancers treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: A multicenter retrospective study.

Park Y, Lee C, Seo W, Chung J, Ku J, Kim K Oncol Lett. 2025; 29(4):211.

PMID: 40070791 PMC: 11894504. DOI: 10.3892/ol.2025.14957.


A case of papillary renal cell carcinoma with para-aortic lymph node metastasis that was completely resectable after treatment with combination therapy comprising lenvatinib and pembrolizumab and robot-assisted radical nephrectomy.

Hosoi T, Yoshioka S, Hiraguri A, Kirihana Y, Koguchi T, Tamaki M IJU Case Rep. 2025; 8(2):150-153.

PMID: 40034897 PMC: 11872193. DOI: 10.1002/iju5.12830.


References
1.
Wolchok J, Kluger H, Callahan M, Postow M, Rizvi N, Lesokhin A . Nivolumab plus ipilimumab in advanced melanoma. N Engl J Med. 2013; 369(2):122-33. PMC: 5698004. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1302369. View

2.
Rao D, Butt Z, Rosenbloom S, Robinson Jr D, Von Roenn J, Kuzel T . A Comparison of the Renal Cell Carcinoma-Symptom Index (RCC-SI) and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Kidney Symptom Index (FKSI). J Pain Symptom Manage. 2009; 38(2):291-8. PMC: 2901424. DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2008.08.013. View

3.
Heng D, Xie W, Regan M, Harshman L, Bjarnason G, Vaishampayan U . External validation and comparison with other models of the International Metastatic Renal-Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium prognostic model: a population-based study. Lancet Oncol. 2013; 14(2):141-8. PMC: 4144042. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70559-4. View

4.
Choueiri T, Figueroa D, Fay A, Signoretti S, Liu Y, Gagnon R . Correlation of PD-L1 tumor expression and treatment outcomes in patients with renal cell carcinoma receiving sunitinib or pazopanib: results from COMPARZ, a randomized controlled trial. Clin Cancer Res. 2014; 21(5):1071-7. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-1993. View

5.
Motzer R, Hutson T, Tomczak P, Michaelson M, Bukowski R, Rixe O . Sunitinib versus interferon alfa in metastatic renal-cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2007; 356(2):115-24. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa065044. View