» Articles » PMID: 25399552

Nivolumab in Previously Untreated Melanoma Without BRAF Mutation

Abstract

Background: Nivolumab was associated with higher rates of objective response than chemotherapy in a phase 3 study involving patients with ipilimumab-refractory metastatic melanoma. The use of nivolumab in previously untreated patients with advanced melanoma has not been tested in a phase 3 controlled study.

Methods: We randomly assigned 418 previously untreated patients who had metastatic melanoma without a BRAF mutation to receive nivolumab (at a dose of 3 mg per kilogram of body weight every 2 weeks and dacarbazine-matched placebo every 3 weeks) or dacarbazine (at a dose of 1000 mg per square meter of body-surface area every 3 weeks and nivolumab-matched placebo every 2 weeks). The primary end point was overall survival.

Results: At 1 year, the overall rate of survival was 72.9% (95% confidence interval [CI], 65.5 to 78.9) in the nivolumab group, as compared with 42.1% (95% CI, 33.0 to 50.9) in the dacarbazine group (hazard ratio for death, 0.42; 99.79% CI, 0.25 to 0.73; P<0.001). The median progression-free survival was 5.1 months in the nivolumab group versus 2.2 months in the dacarbazine group (hazard ratio for death or progression of disease, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.34 to 0.56; P<0.001). The objective response rate was 40.0% (95% CI, 33.3 to 47.0) in the nivolumab group versus 13.9% (95% CI, 9.5 to 19.4) in the dacarbazine group (odds ratio, 4.06; P<0.001). The survival benefit with nivolumab versus dacarbazine was observed across prespecified subgroups, including subgroups defined by status regarding the programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1). Common adverse events associated with nivolumab included fatigue, pruritus, and nausea. Drug-related adverse events of grade 3 or 4 occurred in 11.7% of the patients treated with nivolumab and 17.6% of those treated with dacarbazine.

Conclusions: Nivolumab was associated with significant improvements in overall survival and progression-free survival, as compared with dacarbazine, among previously untreated patients who had metastatic melanoma without a BRAF mutation. (Funded by Bristol-Myers Squibb; CheckMate 066 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01721772.).

Citing Articles

Novel immune drug combination induces tumour microenvironment remodelling and reduces the dosage of anti-PD-1 antibody.

Ozasa T, Nakajima M, Tsunedomi R, Goto S, Adachi K, Takahashi H Sci Rep. 2025; 15(1):8956.

PMID: 40089538 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-87344-6.


Surgical management of oligometastatic recurrence in primary esophageal melanoma: a feasible approach in resource-limited settings.

Kondratskyi Y, Pepenin M, Horodetskyi A, Dobrzhanskyi O, Kolesnyk A, Shudrak Y J Surg Case Rep. 2025; 2025(3):rjaf123.

PMID: 40079041 PMC: 11896786. DOI: 10.1093/jscr/rjaf123.


Revolutionary Cancer Therapy for Personalization and Improved Efficacy: Strategies to Overcome Resistance to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy.

Almawash S Cancers (Basel). 2025; 17(5).

PMID: 40075727 PMC: 11899125. DOI: 10.3390/cancers17050880.


Case of uveitis with increased electroretinographic amplitudes following Nivolumab and Ipilimumab administration for malignant melanoma.

Kato K, Nagashima R, Matsubara H, Yonekawa Y, Kashima Y, Mizumoto K Doc Ophthalmol. 2025; .

PMID: 40072695 DOI: 10.1007/s10633-025-10011-8.


PD-1 transcriptomic landscape across cancers and implications for immune checkpoint blockade outcome.

Chen H, Kim N, Nishizaki D, Nesline M, Conroy J, DePietro P NPJ Genom Med. 2025; 10(1):21.

PMID: 40069238 PMC: 11897377. DOI: 10.1038/s41525-025-00465-9.