» Articles » PMID: 38521835

Outcome Differences by Sex in Oncology Clinical Trials

Overview
Journal Nat Commun
Specialty Biology
Date 2024 Mar 24
PMID 38521835
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Identifying sex differences in outcomes and toxicity between males and females in oncology clinical trials is important and has also been mandated by National Institutes of Health policies. Here we analyze the Trialtrove database, finding that, strikingly, only 472/89,221 oncology clinical trials (0.5%) had curated post-treatment sex comparisons. Among 288 trials with comparisons of survival, outcome, or response, 16% report males having statistically significant better survival outcome or response, while 42% reported significantly better survival outcome or response for females. The strongest differences are in trials of EGFR inhibitors in lung cancer and rituximab in non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (both favoring females). Among 44 trials with side effect comparisons, more trials report significantly lesser side effects in males (N = 22) than in females (N = 13). Thus, while statistical comparisons between sexes in oncology trials are rarely reported, important differences in outcome and toxicity exist. These considerable outcome and toxicity differences highlight the need for reporting sex differences more thoroughly going forward.

Citing Articles

Personalization of Cancer Treatment: Exploring the Role of Chronotherapy in Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Efficacy.

Fey R, Billo A, Clister T, Doan K, Berry E, Tibbitts D Cancers (Basel). 2025; 17(5).

PMID: 40075580 PMC: 11899640. DOI: 10.3390/cancers17050732.


Hallmarks of artificial intelligence contributions to precision oncology.

Chang T, Park S, Schaffer A, Jiang P, Ruppin E Nat Cancer. 2025; .

PMID: 40055572 DOI: 10.1038/s43018-025-00917-2.


Sex Disparity in Cancer: Role of Autophagy and Estrogen Receptors.

Vona R, Cittadini C, Ortona E, Matarrese P Cells. 2025; 14(4).

PMID: 39996745 PMC: 11854201. DOI: 10.3390/cells14040273.


Heterogeneity in Cancer.

MacDonald W, Purcell C, Pinho-Schwermann M, Stubbs N, Srinivasan P, El-Deiry W Cancers (Basel). 2025; 17(3).

PMID: 39941808 PMC: 11816170. DOI: 10.3390/cancers17030441.


Sex-Disaggregated Analysis of Central Venous Catheter-Related Bloodstream Infections in Patients with Cancer.

Schalk E, Seltmann A, Boll B, Giesen N, Grans-Siebel J, Kriege O Oncol Res Treat. 2024; 48(1-2):37-47.

PMID: 39527930 PMC: 11809521. DOI: 10.1159/000542535.


References
1.
Huang Y, Cho H, Stranger B, Huang R . Sex dimorphism in response to targeted therapy and immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer patients: a narrative review. Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2022; 11(5):920-934. PMC: 9186178. DOI: 10.21037/tlcr-21-1013. View

2.
Stergiopoulos S, Getz K, Blazynski C . Evaluating the Completeness of ClinicalTrials.gov. Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2018; 53(3):307-317. DOI: 10.1177/2168479018782885. View

3.
Ye Y, Jing Y, Li L, Mills G, Diao L, Liu H . Sex-associated molecular differences for cancer immunotherapy. Nat Commun. 2020; 11(1):1779. PMC: 7156379. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-15679-x. View

4.
Domagala-Kulawik J, Trojnar A . Lung cancer in women in 21th century. J Thorac Dis. 2020; 12(8):4398-4410. PMC: 7475544. DOI: 10.21037/jtd-20-287. View

5.
Siah K, Kelley N, Ballerstedt S, Holzhauer B, Lyu T, Mettler D . Predicting drug approvals: The Novartis data science and artificial intelligence challenge. Patterns (N Y). 2021; 2(8):100312. PMC: 8369231. DOI: 10.1016/j.patter.2021.100312. View