» Articles » PMID: 32631746

Serial Molecular Profiling of Low-grade Prostate Cancer to Assess Tumor Upgrading: A Longitudinal Cohort Study

Abstract

Background: The potential for low-grade (grade group 1 [GG1]) prostate cancer (PCa) to progress to high-grade disease remains unclear.

Objective: To interrogate the molecular and biological features of low-grade PCa serially over time.

Design, Setting, And Participants: Nested longitudinal cohort study in an academic active surveillance (AS) program. Men were on AS for GG1 PCa from 2012 to 2017.

Intervention: Electronic tracking and resampling of PCa using magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion biopsy.

Outcome Measurements And Statistical Analysis: ERG immunohistochemistry (IHC) and targeted DNA/RNA next-generation sequencing were performed on initial and repeat biopsies. Tumor clonality was assessed. Molecular data were compared between men who upgraded and those who did not upgrade to GG ≥ 2 cancer.

Results And Limitations: Sixty-six men with median age 64 yr (interquartile range [IQR], 59-69) and prostate-specific antigen 4.9 ng/mL (IQR, 3.3-6.4) underwent repeat sampling of a tracked tumor focus (median interval, 11 mo; IQR, 6-13). IHC-based ERG fusion status was concordant at initial and repeat biopsies in 63 men (95% vs expected 50%, p <  0.001), and RNAseq-based fusion and isoform expression were concordant in nine of 13 (69%) ERG patients, supporting focal resampling. Among 15 men who upgraded with complete data at both time points, integrated DNA/RNAseq analysis provided evidence of shared clonality in at least five cases. Such cases could reflect initial undersampling, but also support the possibility of clonal temporal progression of low-grade cancer. Our assessment was limited by sample size and use of targeted sequencing.

Conclusions: Repeat molecular assessment of low-grade tumors suggests that clonal progression could be one mechanism of upgrading. These data underscore the importance of serial tumor assessment in men pursuing AS of low-grade PCa.

Patient Summary: We performed targeted rebiopsy and molecular testing of low-grade tumors on active surveillance. Our findings highlight the importance of periodic biopsy as a component of monitoring for cancer upgrading during surveillance.

Citing Articles

High Omega-3, Low Omega-6 Diet With Fish Oil for Men With Prostate Cancer on Active Surveillance: The CAPFISH-3 Randomized Clinical Trial.

Aronson W, Grogan T, Liang P, Jardack P, Liddell A, Perez C J Clin Oncol. 2024; 43(7):800-809.

PMID: 39671538 PMC: 11869882. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.24.00608.


The Dilemma of Misclassification Rates in Senior Patients With Prostate Cancer, Who Were Treated With Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Implications for Patient Counseling and Diagnostics.

Liakos N, Witt J, Rachubinski P, Leyh-Bannurah S Front Surg. 2022; 9:838477.

PMID: 35252339 PMC: 8888518. DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.838477.


Association Between a 22-feature Genomic Classifier and Biopsy Gleason Upgrade During Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer.

Press B, Jones T, Olawoyin O, Lokeshwar S, Rahman S, Khajir G Eur Urol Open Sci. 2022; 37:113-119.

PMID: 35243396 PMC: 8883188. DOI: 10.1016/j.euros.2022.01.008.


Prediction of Grade Reclassification of Prostate Cancer Patients on Active Surveillance through the Combination of a Three-miRNA Signature and Selected Clinical Variables.

Gandellini P, Ciniselli C, Rancati T, Marenghi C, Doldi V, El Bezawy R Cancers (Basel). 2021; 13(10).

PMID: 34069838 PMC: 8157371. DOI: 10.3390/cancers13102433.

References
1.
Mehra R, Han B, Tomlins S, Wang L, Menon A, Wasco M . Heterogeneity of TMPRSS2 gene rearrangements in multifocal prostate adenocarcinoma: molecular evidence for an independent group of diseases. Cancer Res. 2007; 67(17):7991-5. DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-07-2043. View

2.
Womble P, Montie J, Ye Z, Linsell S, Lane B, Miller D . Contemporary use of initial active surveillance among men in Michigan with low-risk prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2014; 67(1):44-50. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.08.024. View

3.
Warlick C, Trock B, Landis P, Epstein J, Carter H . Delayed versus immediate surgical intervention and prostate cancer outcome. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2006; 98(5):355-7. PMC: 3477641. DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djj072. View

4.
Sowalsky A, Ye H, Bubley G, Balk S . Clonal progression of prostate cancers from Gleason grade 3 to grade 4. Cancer Res. 2012; 73(3):1050-5. PMC: 3587758. DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-12-2799. View

5.
Hovelson D, McDaniel A, Cani A, Johnson B, Rhodes K, Williams P . Development and validation of a scalable next-generation sequencing system for assessing relevant somatic variants in solid tumors. Neoplasia. 2015; 17(4):385-99. PMC: 4415141. DOI: 10.1016/j.neo.2015.03.004. View