» Articles » PMID: 35243396

Association Between a 22-feature Genomic Classifier and Biopsy Gleason Upgrade During Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer

Abstract

Background: Although the Decipher genomic classifier has been validated as a prognostic tool for several prostate cancer endpoints, little is known about its role in assessing the risk of biopsy reclassification for patients on active surveillance, a key event that often triggers treatment.

Objective: To evaluate the association between Decipher genomic classifier scores and biopsy Gleason upgrading among patients on active surveillance.

Design Setting And Participants: This was a retrospective cohort study among patients with low- and favorable intermediate-risk prostate cancer on active surveillance who underwent biopsy-based Decipher testing as part of their clinical care.

Outcome Measurements And Statistical Analysis: We evaluated the association between the Decipher score and any increase in biopsy Gleason grade group (GG) using univariable and multivariable logistic regression. We compared the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for models comprising baseline clinical variables with or without the Decipher score.

Results And Limitations: We identified 133 patients for inclusion with a median age of 67.7 yr and median prostate-specific of 5.6 ng/ml. At enrollment, 75.9% had GG1 and 24.1% had GG2 disease. Forty-three patients experienced biopsy upgrading. On multivariable logistic regression, the Decipher score was significantly associated with biopsy upgrading (odds ratio 1.37 per 0.10 unit increase, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05-1.79; = 0.02). The Decipher score was associated with upgrading among patients with biopsy GG 1 disease, but not GG2 disease. The discriminative ability of a clinical model (AUC 0.63, 95% CI 0.51-0.74) was improved by integration of the Decipher score (AUC 0.69, 95% CI 0.58-0.80).

Conclusions: The Decipher genomic classifier score was associated with short-term biopsy Gleason upgrading among patients on active surveillance.

Patient Summary: The results from this study indicate that among patients with prostate cancer undergoing active surveillance, those with higher Decipher scores were more likely to have higher-grade disease found over time. These findings indicate that the Decipher test might be useful for guiding the intensity of monitoring during active surveillance, such as more frequent biopsy for patients with higher scores.

Citing Articles

Integration of Genomic Tests in Prostate Cancer Care: Implications for Clinical Practice and Patient Outcomes.

Roidos C, Anastasiadis A, Tsiakaras S, Loutradis C, Baniotis P, Memmos D Curr Issues Mol Biol. 2024; 46(12):14408-14421.

PMID: 39727992 PMC: 11674969. DOI: 10.3390/cimb46120864.


High Omega-3, Low Omega-6 Diet With Fish Oil for Men With Prostate Cancer on Active Surveillance: The CAPFISH-3 Randomized Clinical Trial.

Aronson W, Grogan T, Liang P, Jardack P, Liddell A, Perez C J Clin Oncol. 2024; 43(7):800-809.

PMID: 39671538 PMC: 11869882. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.24.00608.


Risk factors for Gleason score upgrade from prostate biopsy to radical prostatectomy.

Smani S, Sundaresan V, Lokeshwar S, Choksi A, Carbonella J, Brito J Explor Target Antitumor Ther. 2024; 5(4):981-996.

PMID: 39280242 PMC: 11390291. DOI: 10.37349/etat.2024.00259.


Development of a Longitudinal Prostate Cancer Transcriptomic and Clinical Data Linkage.

Leapman M, Ho J, Liu Y, Filson C, Zhao X, Hakansson A JAMA Netw Open. 2024; 7(6):e2417274.

PMID: 38874922 PMC: 11179136. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.17274.


Oncological Outcomes in Men With Favorable Intermediate Risk Prostate Cancer Enrolled in Active Surveillance.

Pepe P, Pepe L, Pennisi M, Fraggetta F In Vivo. 2024; 38(3):1300-1305.

PMID: 38688647 PMC: 11059911. DOI: 10.21873/invivo.13569.


References
1.
Cedars B, Washington 3rd S, Cowan J, Leapman M, Tenggara I, Chan J . Stability of a 17-Gene Genomic Prostate Score in Serial Testing of Men on Active Surveillance for Early Stage Prostate Cancer. J Urol. 2019; 202(4):696-701. DOI: 10.1097/JU.0000000000000271. View

2.
Leapman M, Wang R, Ma S, Gross C, Ma X . Regional Adoption of Commercial Gene Expression Testing for Prostate Cancer. JAMA Oncol. 2020; 7(1):52-58. PMC: 7689565. DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.6086. View

3.
Klotz L, Zhang L, Lam A, Nam R, Mamedov A, Loblaw A . Clinical results of long-term follow-up of a large, active surveillance cohort with localized prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009; 28(1):126-31. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2009.24.2180. View

4.
Bloom J, Daneshvar M, Lebastchi A, Ahdoot M, Gold S, Hale G . Risk of adverse pathology at prostatectomy in the era of MRI and targeted biopsies; rethinking active surveillance for intermediate risk prostate cancer patients. Urol Oncol. 2021; 39(10):729.e1-729.e6. DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2021.02.018. View

5.
Jairath N, Dal Pra A, Vince Jr R, Dess R, Jackson W, Tosoian J . A Systematic Review of the Evidence for the Decipher Genomic Classifier in Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol. 2020; 79(3):374-383. DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.11.021. View