The Role of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Ultrasound Fusion Biopsy in Active Surveillance
Authors
Affiliations
Background: Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI)/ultrasound fusion biopsy (targeted biopsy or TB) may improve detection of high-grade cancers when compared to systematic biopsy (SB).
Objective: To assess TB in active surveillance (AS).
Design, Setting, And Participants: We retrospectively evaluated SB (12-core sector) and TB among 103 AS men undergoing surveillance biopsy, 54 men undergoing confirmatory biopsy (CB), and 73 men referred for diagnostic biopsy (DB; comparison group). Regions of interest (ROIs) on mpMRI were assigned a PI-RADS score and targeted if the score was ≥3.
Outcome Measurements And Statistical Analysis: Detection of Gleason score (GS) ≥7 by TB and SB was the outcome of interest, except in a multivariable model, for which any cancer was the outcome.
Results And Limitations: GS ≥7was detected by either biopsy method in 25 men (24.3%) in the AS group, 12 men (22.2%) in the CB group, and 55 men (75.3%) in the DB group.GS ≥7 was found in 24.3% by SB + TB versus 20.4% by SB in the AS group (p=0.13); in 22.2% by SB + TB versus 16.7% by SB in the CB group (p=0.25); and in 75.3% by SB + TB versus 58.9% by SB in the DB group (p=0.002). The sensitivity for GS ≥7 detection was lower for TB than for SB (p=0.006) in the AS cohort (relative sensitivity ratio 0.33, 95% confidence interval 0.16-0.71). Higher PI-RADS score (4 vs 3, odds ratio [OR] 2.00, p=0.04; 5 vs 3, OR 4.74, p=0.02), lower MRI-estimated prostate volume (OR 1.20 per 10-cm lower volume, p=0.01), larger ROI (OR 1.04 per mm, p=0.02), and right-sided ROI (OR 2.27, p=0.01) were associated with finding cancer on TB. A potential limitation is that not all men who presented for biopsy underwent TB and the urologist was not blinded to MRI results before SB.
Conclusions: Owing to the low relative sensitivity of mpMRI for detection of GS ≥7 disease, SB still needs to be performed for men on AS.
Patient Summary: This study suggests that image-guided prostate biopsy alone may not be informative for men enrolled in an active surveillance program for prostate cancer.
MRI and active surveillance: thoughts from across the pond.
Campbell R, Wood A, Schwen Z, Ward R, Weight C, Purysko A Eur Radiol. 2024; .
PMID: 39266769 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-024-10866-6.
"Targeted microwave ablation: another way to kick the can(cer) down the road?".
Ma T, Kishan A Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2022; 26(4):635-636.
PMID: 36220855 DOI: 10.1038/s41391-022-00603-9.
Chen H, Bok R, Cooperberg M, Nguyen H, Shinohara K, Westphalen A Magn Reson Med. 2022; 88(6):2609-2620.
PMID: 35975978 PMC: 9794017. DOI: 10.1002/mrm.29399.
Ellis E, Frye T Ther Adv Urol. 2022; 14:17562872221106883.
PMID: 35872881 PMC: 9297445. DOI: 10.1177/17562872221106883.
Pavlovich C, Hyndman M, Eure G, Ghai S, Caumartin Y, Herget E BJUI Compass. 2022; 2(2):126-133.
PMID: 35474889 PMC: 8988781. DOI: 10.1002/bco2.59.