Farm to School Activities and Student Outcomes: A Systematic Review

Overview

Journal Adv Nutr

Publisher Elsevier

Specialty Nutritional Sciences

Date 2020 Mar 17

PMID 32173754

Citations 8

Authors

Melissa Pflugh Prescott

Rebecca Cleary

Alessandro Bonanno

Marco Costanigro

Becca B R Jablonski

Abigail B Long

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Farm to school programs (F2SPs) operate in 42% of school districts and are supported in part through federal and state policies as well as philanthropic funding. Although research evaluating the effects of farm to school-related activities on student outcomes is growing, a systematic review of the results and thus a synthesis of implications for future programming have not occurred. The primary objective of this systematic literature review is to summarize and evaluate studies on student outcomes associated with farm to school-related activities up to 1 September, 2017. Four databases spanning 4 research disciplines were used to identify full-text, English-language studies. Twenty-one studies were reviewed: 7 explicitly investigated F2SPs, and 14 evaluated the impact of school-based interventions that were relevant to activities reported in the 2013 and/or 2015 Farm to School Census. All of the F2SP studies (n = 7) and 85.7% of farm to school-related activity studies (n = 12) were multicomponent, and there was a wide variety of implemented intervention components across the reviewed studies. Results from F2SP and farm to school-related activity studies consistently show positive impacts on food and nutrition-related knowledge; most studies also suggest a positive relation between farm to school-related activities and healthy food selection during school meals, nutrition self-efficacy, and willingness to try fruits and vegetables. The impact of farm to school activities on fruit and vegetable consumption and preferences is unclear. The most common F2SP study limitations were study designs that preclude causal inference, outcome measurement with no reported or limited psychometric testing, lack of long-term outcome evaluation, and challenges related to quantifying intervention implementation. These findings underscore the need for more conclusive evidence on the relation between farm to school-related activities and changes in fruit and vegetable consumption.

Citing Articles

Factors and Outcomes Associated With Using Scratch-Cooked, Organic, and Locally Grown Foods in School Meals in California.

Zuercher M, Orta-Aleman D, French C, Cohen J, Hecht C, Hecht K J Sch Health. 2025; 95(3):235-246.

PMID: 39763015 PMC: 11860737. DOI: 10.1111/josh.13533.

Considering tradeoffs in "local" food policies: examples from school feeding programmes.

Jablonski B, Milbourne P, Maderson S, Morgan K Front Nutr. 2023; 10:1242493.

PMID: 37771752 PMC: 10523382. DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2023.1242493.

Interventions to Strengthen Environmental Sustainability of School Food Systems: Narrative Scoping Review.

Gardner G, Burton W, Sinclair M, Bryant M Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023; 20(11).

PMID: 37297520 PMC: 10252980. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20115916.

The effects of a non-school setting on quantity and quality of biology knowledge of primary students-A pilot study.

Malarikova L, Machova K, Svobodova I, Prochazkova R, Makovcova A PLoS One. 2023; 18(4):e0284300.

PMID: 37104470 PMC: 10138845. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0284300.

Impact of a School-Based Gardening, Cooking, Nutrition Intervention on Diet Intake and Quality: The TX Sprouts Randomized Controlled Trial.

Landry M, van den Berg A, Hoelscher D, Asigbee F, Vandyousefi S, Ghaddar R Nutrients. 2021; 13(9).

PMID: 34578959 PMC: 8471386. DOI: 10.3390/nu13093081.

References

Hoffman J, Thompson D, Franko D, Power T, Leff S, Stallings V . Decaying behavioral effects in a randomized, multi-year fruit and vegetable intake intervention. Prev Med. 2011; 52(5):370-5. PMC: 3078952. DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2011.02.013. View

Conrad Z, Niles M, Neher D, Roy E, Tichenor N, Jahns L . Relationship between food waste, diet quality, and environmental sustainability. PLoS One. 2018; 13(4):e0195405. PMC: 5905889. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0195405. View

Evans A, Ranjit N, Rutledge R, Medina J, Jennings R, Smiley A . Exposure to multiple components of a garden-based intervention for middle school students increases fruit and vegetable consumption. Health Promot Pract. 2012; 13(5):608-16. DOI: 10.1177/1524839910390357. View

Kain J, Uauy R, Concha F, Leyton B, Bustos N, Salazar G . School-based obesity prevention interventions for Chilean children during the past decades: lessons learned. Adv Nutr. 2012; 3(4):616S-621S. PMC: 3649735. DOI: 10.3945/an.112.001966. View

Keshavarz N, Nutbeam D, Rowling L, Khavarpour F . Schools as social complex adaptive systems: a new way to understand the challenges of introducing the health promoting schools concept. Soc Sci Med. 2010; 70(10):1467-74. DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2010.01.034. View

Curran G, Bauer M, Mittman B, Pyne J, Stetler C . Effectiveness-implementation hybrid designs: combining elements of clinical effectiveness and implementation research to enhance public health impact. Med Care. 2012; 50(3):217-26. PMC: 3731143. DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3182408812. View

Bogart L, Cowgill B, Elliott M, Klein D, Hawes-Dawson J, Uyeda K . A randomized controlled trial of students for nutrition and eXercise: a community-based participatory research study. J Adolesc Health. 2014; 55(3):415-22. PMC: 4143532. DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2014.03.003. View

Reynolds K, FRANKLIN F, Binkley D, Raczynski J, Harrington K, Kirk K . Increasing the fruit and vegetable consumption of fourth-graders: results from the high 5 project. Prev Med. 2000; 30(4):309-19. DOI: 10.1006/pmed.1999.0630. View

Bontrager Yoder A, Foecke L, Schoeller D . Factors affecting fruit and vegetable school lunch waste in Wisconsin elementary schools participating in Farm to School programmes. Public Health Nutr. 2015; 18(15):2855-63. PMC: 10271538. DOI: 10.1017/S1368980015000385. View

10.

Bates D, Price J . Impact of Fruit Smoothies on Adolescent Fruit Consumption at School. Health Educ Behav. 2015; 42(4):487-92. DOI: 10.1177/1090198114561514. View

11.

Willi S, Hirst K, Jago R, Buse J, Kaufman F, El Ghormli L . Cardiovascular risk factors in multi-ethnic middle school students: the HEALTHY primary prevention trial. Pediatr Obes. 2012; 7(3):230-9. PMC: 3348358. DOI: 10.1111/j.2047-6310.2011.00042.x. View

12.

Perry C, Bishop D, Taylor G, Davis M, Story M, Gray C . A randomized school trial of environmental strategies to encourage fruit and vegetable consumption among children. Health Educ Behav. 2004; 31(1):65-76. DOI: 10.1177/1090198103255530. View

13.

Foster G, Sherman S, Borradaile K, Grundy K, Vander Veur S, Nachmani J . A policy-based school intervention to prevent overweight and obesity. Pediatrics. 2008; 121(4):e794-802. DOI: 10.1542/peds.2007-1365. View

14.

Thomas L, Hill T, Gaines A, Dollahite J . Implementing Smarter Lunchrooms Makeovers in New York state middle schools: an initial process evaluation. Arch Public Health. 2016; 74:41. PMC: 5043616. DOI: 10.1186/s13690-016-0153-9. View

15.

Moss A, Smith S, Null D, Roth S, Tragoudas U . Farm to School and Nutrition Education: Positively Affecting Elementary School-Aged Children's Nutrition Knowledge and Consumption Behavior. Child Obes. 2013; 9(1):51-6. PMC: 3621303. DOI: 10.1089/chi.2012.0056. View

16.

Hoffman J, Franko D, Thompson D, Power T, Stallings V . Longitudinal behavioral effects of a school-based fruit and vegetable promotion program. J Pediatr Psychol. 2009; 35(1):61-71. PMC: 2910936. DOI: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsp041. View

17.

Worsley A . Nutrition knowledge and food consumption: can nutrition knowledge change food behaviour?. Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2002; 11 Suppl 3:S579-85. DOI: 10.1046/j.1440-6047.11.supp3.7.x. View

18.

Folta S, Goldberg J, Economos C, Bell R, Landers S, Hyatt R . Assessing the use of school public address systems to deliver nutrition messages to children: Shape up Somerville--audio adventures. J Sch Health. 2006; 76(9):459-64. DOI: 10.1111/j.1746-1561.2006.00141.x. View

19.

Smith C, Corriveau N, Aaronson S, Fitzgerald C, Heeres A, Eagle K . School intervention incorporates farm to school programs to highlight healthy eating: a report from Project Healthy Schools. Child Obes. 2012; 8(6):584-7. DOI: 10.1089/chi.2012.0042. View

20.

Struempler B, Parmer S, Mastropietro L, Arsiwalla D, Bubb R . Changes in fruit and vegetable consumption of third-grade students in body quest: food of the warrior, a 17-class childhood obesity prevention program. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2014; 46(4):286-292. DOI: 10.1016/j.jneb.2014.03.001. View