» Articles » PMID: 34022839

Evaluating OzHarvest's Primary-school Food Education and Sustainability Training (FEAST) Program in 10-12-year-old Children in Australia: Protocol for a Pragmatic Cluster Non-randomized Controlled Trial

Overview
Publisher Biomed Central
Specialty Public Health
Date 2021 May 23
PMID 34022839
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The promotion of healthy eating is a public health priority. Poor dietary behaviours, including low fruit and vegetable (F&V) consumption are of particular concern among children. Novel nutrition promotion strategies are needed to improve F&V consumption. Sustainability education could be used to support nutrition education within the school context. The purpose of this paper is to report the protocol for impact and process evaluation of the school-based Food Education and Sustainability Training (FEAST) program, designed to educate children about sustainability, food waste and nutrition, using hands-on cooking activities.

Methods: A pragmatic, parallel, cluster non-randomized controlled trial with pre- and post-measures, will be implemented among 20 primary schools (10 intervention vs 10 wait-list-control) within NSW, Australia, involving children in Grades 5-6. FEAST is a curriculum-aligned program, delivered as a 1.5-h lesson/week, for a 10-week unit of inquiry, incorporating theory and cooking. FEAST was developed using theoretical frameworks which included Social Cognitive Theory and the Precede-Proceed Planning model. Primary outcomes include children's self-reported F&V intakes (serves/day). Food literacy constructs such as: nutrition knowledge, food preparation and cooking skills, self-efficacy and behaviours, food waste knowledge and behaviours and food production knowledge, will be assessed as secondary outcomes. Process evaluation will assess program reach, adoption, implementation, maintenance, satisfaction and perceived benefits by teachers and students. An online survey (including quantitative and qualitative questions) was developed for administration at baseline (impact evaluation) and immediately post-intervention (impact and process evaluation). Intervention effects on quantitative study outcomes will be estimated with ​generalised linear mixed models, including random effects and will follow the intention-to-treat principles. Open-ended questions embedded within the surveys will be analysed qualitatively using content and thematic analyses.

Discussion: Results from this trial will provide valuable information on the value of adding environmental sustainability strategies to nutrition education in schools. Results will inform the design of future research and programs focused on primary-school children's nutrition, sustainability-related behaviours and experiential school-based interventions.

Trial Registration: Trial registered 14th December 2020 with the Australian and New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ( ACTRN12620001347954 ).

Citing Articles

The Effects of Parental Food Education on Children's Food Literacy: The Mediating Role of Parent-Child Relationship and Learning Motivation.

Xu X, Cai H, Zhang J, Xia T Nutrients. 2024; 16(15).

PMID: 39125443 PMC: 11314356. DOI: 10.3390/nu16152564.


Primary-school-aged children inspire their peers and families to eat more vegetables in the KiiDSAY project: a qualitative descriptive study.

F K, A W, S S, K B, R L BMC Pediatr. 2024; 24(1):175.

PMID: 38461327 PMC: 10924354. DOI: 10.1186/s12887-024-04643-z.


Impact and process evaluation of a primary-school Food Education and Sustainability Training (FEAST) program in 10-12-year-old children in Australia: pragmatic cluster non-randomized controlled trial.

Karpouzis F, Lindberg R, Walsh A, Shah S, Abbott G, Ball K BMC Public Health. 2024; 24(1):657.

PMID: 38429629 PMC: 10905805. DOI: 10.1186/s12889-024-18079-8.


A Systematic Review of Healthy Nutrition Intervention Programs in Kindergarten and Primary Education.

Collado-Soler R, Alferez-Pastor M, Torres F, Trigueros R, Aguilar-Parra J, Navarro N Nutrients. 2023; 15(3).

PMID: 36771248 PMC: 9921877. DOI: 10.3390/nu15030541.


School lunchboxes as an opportunity for health and environmental considerations: a scoping review.

Lalchandani N, Poirier B, Crabb S, Miller C, Hume C Health Promot Int. 2023; 38(1).

PMID: 36715703 PMC: 9885980. DOI: 10.1093/heapro/daac201.


References
1.
Li P, Stuart E . Best (but oft-forgotten) practices: missing data methods in randomized controlled nutrition trials. Am J Clin Nutr. 2019; 109(3):504-508. PMC: 6408317. DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/nqy271. View

2.
. Health effects of dietary risks in 195 countries, 1990-2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. 2019; 393(10184):1958-1972. PMC: 6899507. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30041-8. View

3.
Krolner R, Jorgensen T, Aarestrup A, Christiansen A, Christensen A, Due P . The Boost study: design of a school- and community-based randomised trial to promote fruit and vegetable consumption among teenagers. BMC Public Health. 2012; 12:191. PMC: 3375189. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-191. View

4.
Bradshaw C, Atkinson S, Doody O . Employing a Qualitative Description Approach in Health Care Research. Glob Qual Nurs Res. 2017; 4:2333393617742282. PMC: 5703087. DOI: 10.1177/2333393617742282. View

5.
Schoonenboom J, Johnson R . How to Construct a Mixed Methods Research Design. Kolner Z Soz Sozpsychol. 2017; 69(Suppl 2):107-131. PMC: 5602001. DOI: 10.1007/s11577-017-0454-1. View