» Articles » PMID: 32157425

Rpn4 and Proteasome-mediated Yeast Resistance to Ethanol Includes Regulation of Autophagy

Abstract

Distilled spirits production using Saccharomyces cerevisiae requires understanding of the mechanisms of yeast cell response to alcohol stress. Reportedly, specific mutations in genes of the ubiquitin-proteasome system, e.g., RPN4, may result in strains exhibiting hyper-resistance to different alcohols. To study the Rpn4-dependent yeast response to short-term ethanol exposure, we performed a comparative analysis of the wild-type (WT) strain, strain with RPN4 gene deletion (rpn4-Δ), and a mutant strain with decreased proteasome activity and consequent Rpn4 accumulation due to PRE1 deregulation (YPL). The stress resistance tests demonstrated an increased sensitivity of mutant strains to ethanol compared with WT. Comparative proteomics analysis revealed significant differences in molecular responses to ethanol between these strains. GO analysis of proteins upregulated in WT showed enrichments represented by oxidative and heat responses, protein folding/unfolding, and protein degradation. Enrichment of at least one of these responses was not observed in the mutant strains. Moreover, activity of autophagy was not increased in the RPN4 deletion strain upon ethanol stress which agrees with changes in mRNA levels of ATG7 and PRB1 genes of the autophagy system. Activity of the autophagic system was clearly induced and accompanied with PRB1 overexpression in the YPL strain upon ethanol stress. We demonstrated that Rpn4 stabilization contributes to the PRB1 upregulation. CRISPR-Cas9-mediated repression of PACE-core Rpn4 binding sites in the PRB1 promoter inhibits PRB1 induction in the YPL strain upon ethanol treatment and results in YPL hypersensitivity to ethanol. Our data suggest that Rpn4 affects the autophagic system activity upon ethanol stress through the PRB1 regulation. These findings can be a basis for creating genetically modified yeast strains resistant to high levels of alcohol, being further used for fermentation in ethanol production.

Citing Articles

Comparative Proteomics of Two Flor Yeasts in Sparkling Wine Fermentation: First Approach.

Garcia-Garcia J, Garcia-Martinez T, Roman-Camacho J, Moreno J, Mauricio J Foods. 2025; 14(2).

PMID: 39856948 PMC: 11764631. DOI: 10.3390/foods14020282.


Yeast Ribonucleotide Reductase Is a Direct Target of the Proteasome and Provides Hyper Resistance to the Carcinogen 4-NQO.

Spasskaya D, Kulagin K, Grineva E, Osipova P, Poddubko S, Bubis J J Fungi (Basel). 2023; 9(3).

PMID: 36983519 PMC: 10057556. DOI: 10.3390/jof9030351.


Mining novel -regulatory elements from the emergent host using transcriptomic data.

Nora L, Anzolini Cassiano M, Santana I, Guazzaroni M, Silva-Rocha R, da Silva R Front Microbiol. 2023; 13:1069443.

PMID: 36687612 PMC: 9853887. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2022.1069443.


Stress modulation as a means to improve yeasts for lignocellulose bioconversion.

Brandt B, Jansen T, Volschenk H, Gorgens J, van Zyl W, Den Haan R Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2021; 105(12):4899-4918.

PMID: 34097119 DOI: 10.1007/s00253-021-11383-y.


The Identification of Genetic Determinants of Methanol Tolerance in Yeast Suggests Differences in Methanol and Ethanol Toxicity Mechanisms and Candidates for Improved Methanol Tolerance Engineering.

Mota M, Martins L, Sa-Correia I J Fungi (Basel). 2021; 7(2).

PMID: 33513997 PMC: 7911966. DOI: 10.3390/jof7020090.


References
1.
Abo B, Gao M, Wang Y, Wu C, Ma H, Wang Q . Lignocellulosic biomass for bioethanol: an overview on pretreatment, hydrolysis and fermentation processes. Rev Environ Health. 2019; 34(1):57-68. DOI: 10.1515/reveh-2018-0054. View

2.
Alexandre H, Dequin S, Blondin B . Global gene expression during short-term ethanol stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEBS Lett. 2001; 498(1):98-103. DOI: 10.1016/s0014-5793(01)02503-0. View

3.
Auesukaree C . Molecular mechanisms of the yeast adaptive response and tolerance to stresses encountered during ethanol fermentation. J Biosci Bioeng. 2017; 124(2):133-142. DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiosc.2017.03.009. View

4.
Bao Z, Xiao H, Liang J, Zhang L, Xiong X, Sun N . Homology-integrated CRISPR-Cas (HI-CRISPR) system for one-step multigene disruption in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. ACS Synth Biol. 2014; 4(5):585-94. DOI: 10.1021/sb500255k. View

5.
Bubis J, Levitsky L, Ivanov M, Tarasova I, Gorshkov M . Comparative evaluation of label-free quantification methods for shotgun proteomics. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2017; 31(7):606-612. DOI: 10.1002/rcm.7829. View