» Articles » PMID: 32049269

Effect of Reduced Exposure to Vasopressors on 90-Day Mortality in Older Critically Ill Patients With Vasodilatory Hypotension: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Abstract

Importance: Vasopressors are commonly administered to intensive care unit (ICU) patients to raise blood pressure. Balancing risks and benefits of vasopressors is a challenge, particularly in older patients.

Objective: To determine whether reducing exposure to vasopressors through permissive hypotension (mean arterial pressure [MAP] target, 60-65 mm Hg) reduces mortality at 90 days in ICU patients aged 65 years or older with vasodilatory hypotension.

Design, Setting, And Participants: A multicenter, pragmatic, randomized clinical trial was conducted in 65 ICUs in the United Kingdom and included 2600 randomized patients aged 65 years or older with vasodilatory hypotension (assessed by treating clinician). The study was conducted from July 2017 to March 2019, and follow-up was completed in August 2019.

Interventions: Patients were randomized 1:1 to vasopressors guided either by MAP target (60-65 mm Hg, permissive hypotension) (n = 1291) or according to usual care (at the discretion of treating clinicians) (n = 1307).

Main Outcome And Measures: The primary clinical outcome was all-cause mortality at 90 days.

Results: Of 2600 randomized patients, after removal of those who declined or had withdrawn consent, 2463 (95%) were included in the analysis of the primary outcome (mean [SD] age 75 years [7 years]; 1387 [57%] men). Patients randomized to the permissive hypotension group had lower exposure to vasopressors compared with those in the usual care group (median duration 33 hours vs 38 hours; difference in medians, -5.0; 95% CI, -7.8 to -2.2 hours; total dose in norepinephrine equivalents median, 17.7 mg vs 26.4 mg; difference in medians, -8.7 mg; 95% CI, -12.8 to -4.6 mg). At 90 days, 500 of 1221 (41.0%) in the permissive hypotension compared with 544 of 1242 (43.8%) in the usual care group had died (absolute risk difference, -2.85%; 95% CI, -6.75 to 1.05; P = .15) (unadjusted relative risk, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.85-1.03). When adjusted for prespecified baseline variables, the odds ratio for 90-day mortality was 0.82 (95% CI, 0.68 to 0.98). Serious adverse events were reported for 79 patients (6.2%) in the permissive care group and 75 patients (5.8%) in the usual care group. The most common serious adverse events were acute renal failure (41 [3.2%] vs 33 [2.5%]) and supraventricular cardiac arrhythmia (12 [0.9%] vs 13 [1.0%]).

Conclusions And Relevance: Among patients 65 years or older receiving vasopressors for vasodilatory hypotension, permissive hypotension compared with usual care did not result in a statistically significant reduction in mortality at 90 days. However, the confidence interval around the point estimate for the primary outcome should be considered when interpreting the clinical importance of the study.

Trial Registration: isrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN10580502.

Citing Articles

The Japanese Clinical Practice Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock 2024.

Shime N, Nakada T, Yatabe T, Yamakawa K, Aoki Y, Inoue S Acute Med Surg. 2025; 12(1):e70037.

PMID: 39996161 PMC: 11848044. DOI: 10.1002/ams2.70037.


Acute Kidney Injury During Sepsis and Prognostic Role of Coexistent Chronic Heart Failure.

Soukup J, Pliquett R J Clin Med. 2025; 14(3).

PMID: 39941634 PMC: 11818498. DOI: 10.3390/jcm14030964.


Individualized autoregulation-guided arterial blood pressure management in neurocritical care.

Gomez J, Bhende B, Mathur R, Gonzalez L, Shah V Neurotherapeutics. 2025; 22(1):e00526.

PMID: 39828496 PMC: 11840358. DOI: 10.1016/j.neurot.2025.e00526.


Eligibility Criteria of Randomized Clinical Trials in Critical Care Medicine.

Heirali A, Heybati K, Sereeyotin J, Khan F, Yarnell C, Krewulak K JAMA Netw Open. 2025; 8(1):e2454944.

PMID: 39821399 PMC: 11742542. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.54944.


Haemodynamic management of septic shock.

Kotani Y, Ryan N, Udy A, Fujii T Burns Trauma. 2025; 13():tkae081.

PMID: 39816212 PMC: 11735046. DOI: 10.1093/burnst/tkae081.


References
1.
Asfar P, Meziani F, Hamel J, Grelon F, Megarbane B, Anguel N . High versus low blood-pressure target in patients with septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2014; 370(17):1583-93. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1312173. View

2.
Varpula M, Tallgren M, Saukkonen K, Voipio-Pulkki L, Pettila V . Hemodynamic variables related to outcome in septic shock. Intensive Care Med. 2005; 31(8):1066-71. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-005-2688-z. View

3.
Ferrando-Vivas P, Jones A, Rowan K, Harrison D . Development and validation of the new ICNARC model for prediction of acute hospital mortality in adult critical care. J Crit Care. 2016; 38:335-339. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2016.11.031. View

4.
Devlin N, Shah K, Feng Y, Mulhern B, van Hout B . Valuing health-related quality of life: An EQ-5D-5L value set for England. Health Econ. 2017; 27(1):7-22. PMC: 6680214. DOI: 10.1002/hec.3564. View

5.
Thomas K, Patel A, Zia Sadique M, Grieve R, Mason A, Moler S . Evaluating the clinical and cost-effectiveness of permissive hypotension in critically ill patients aged 65 years or over with vasodilatory hypotension: Statistical and health economic analysis plan for the 65 trial in article. J Intensive Care Soc. 2020; 21(3):230-231. PMC: 7401437. DOI: 10.1177/1751143720938894. View