» Articles » PMID: 38352092

Comparison of High-Normal Versus Low-Normal Mean Arterial Pressure at Target on Outcomes in Sepsis or Shock Patients: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Control Trials

Overview
Journal Cureus
Date 2024 Feb 14
PMID 38352092
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The objective of this meta-analysis was to compare the impact of a high-normal and a low-normal mean arterial pressure (MAP) target on outcomes in patients with sepsis or shock. Adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines, two investigators conducted a thorough literature search across online databases, including PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and EMBASE, spanning from inception to December 10, 2023. The assessed outcomes encompassed all-cause mortality, the need for renal replacement therapy, and the length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay. A total of four randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included, involving 3507 participants with individual study participant counts ranging from 118 to 2463. The pooled analysis revealed no statistically significant difference in the risk of all-cause mortality between the two groups (Risk Ratio (RR): 0.94, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.87 to 1.01). Furthermore, there was no disparity in the rates of renal replacement therapy and the duration of ICU stay between the high-normal and low-normal MAP groups. Our findings indicate no significant distinctions in mortality, rates of renal replacement therapy, or ICU stay duration between the two groups. However, future trials with larger sample sizes are warranted to comprehensively understand the nuanced effects of different MAP settings on outcomes in patients with sepsis and shock.

Citing Articles

Optimal target mean arterial pressure for patients with sepsis-associated encephalopathy: a retrospective cohort study.

Peng H, Liang Z, Zhang S, Yang Y BMC Infect Dis. 2024; 24(1):902.

PMID: 39223467 PMC: 11367872. DOI: 10.1186/s12879-024-09789-w.

References
1.
Xu J, Ma S, Pan C, He H, Cai S, Hu S . A high mean arterial pressure target is associated with improved microcirculation in septic shock patients with previous hypertension: a prospective open label study. Crit Care. 2015; 19:130. PMC: 4409762. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-015-0866-0. View

2.
Leone M, Blidi S, Antonini F, Meyssignac B, Bordon S, Garcin F . Oxygen tissue saturation is lower in nonsurvivors than in survivors after early resuscitation of septic shock. Anesthesiology. 2009; 111(2):366-71. DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181aae72d. View

3.
Maiwall R, Pasupuleti S, Hidam A, Kumar A, Tevethia H, Vijayaraghavan R . A randomised-controlled trial (TARGET-C) of high vs. low target mean arterial pressure in patients with cirrhosis and septic shock. J Hepatol. 2023; 79(2):349-361. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2023.04.006. View

4.
Dellinger R, Levy M, Rhodes A, Annane D, Gerlach H, Opal S . Surviving sepsis campaign: international guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shock: 2012. Crit Care Med. 2013; 41(2):580-637. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31827e83af. View

5.
Bhate T, McDonald B, Sekhon M, Griesdale D . Association between blood pressure and outcomes in patients after cardiac arrest: A systematic review. Resuscitation. 2015; 97:1-6. DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.08.023. View