Core Outcome Measures for Clinical Research in Acute Respiratory Failure Survivors. An International Modified Delphi Consensus Study

Overview

Journal Am J Respir Crit Care Med

Specialty Critical Care

Date 2017 May 25

PMID 28537429

Citations 176

Authors

Dale M Needham

Kristin A Sepulveda

Victor D Dinglas

Caroline M Chessare

Lisa Aronson Friedman

Clifton O Bingham 3rd

Alison E Turnbull

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

Rationale: Research evaluating acute respiratory failure (ARF) survivors' outcomes after hospital discharge has substantial heterogeneity in terms of the measurement instruments used, creating barriers to synthesizing study data.

Objectives: To identify a minimum set of core outcome measures that are essential to include in all clinical research studies evaluating ARF survivors after discharge.

Methods: We conducted a three-round modified Delphi consensus process with 77 participants (47% female, 55% outside the United States), including clinical researchers from more than 16 countries across six continents, patients/caregivers, clinicians, and research funders. Participants reviewed standardized information on measure instruments for seven consensus-derived outcomes plus one recommended outcome.

Measurements And Main Results: Response rates were 91 to 97% across the three rounds. Among 75 measurement instruments evaluated, the following met a priori consensus criteria: EQ-5D and 36-item Short Form Health Survey version 2 (optional) for the "satisfaction with life and personal enjoyment" and "pain" outcomes, and both the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and the Impact of Events Scale-Revised for the "mental health" outcome. No measures reached consensus for the following outcomes: cognition, muscle and/or nerve function, physical function, and pulmonary function. All measures considered for pulmonary function met consensus criteria for exclusion. The following measures did not reach the threshold for consensus but achieved the highest scores for their respective outcomes: the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (cognition), manual muscle testing and handgrip dynamometry (muscle and/or nerve function), and 6-minute-walk test (physical function).

Conclusions: This Core Outcome Measurement Set is recommended for use in all clinical research evaluating ARF survivors after hospital discharge. In the future, researchers should evaluate measures for outcomes not reaching consensus.

Citing Articles

Physical Activity Monitoring in Children in the 1-Year After 3 or More Days of Invasive Ventilation: Feasibility of Using Accelerometers.

Maddux A, Miller K, Sierra Y, Bennett T, Watson R, Spear M Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2025; 26(3):e324-e333.

PMID: 40048300 PMC: 11889392. DOI: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000003657.

Investigating the safety of physical rehabilitation with critically ill patients receiving vasoactive drugs: An exploratory observational feasibility study.

Woodbridge H, Alexander C, Brett S, Antcliffe D, Chan E, Gordon A PLoS One. 2025; 20(2):e0318150.

PMID: 39946416 PMC: 11824961. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0318150.

Outcome Measures to Evaluate Functional Recovery in Survivors of Respiratory Failure: A Scoping Review.

Parrotte K, Mercado L, Lappen H, Iwashyna T, Hough C, Valley T CHEST Crit Care. 2025; 2(3.

PMID: 39822343 PMC: 11737505. DOI: 10.1016/j.chstcc.2024.100084.

Psychological impact of an intensive care admission for COVID-19 on patients in the United Kingdom.

Waite A, Cherry M, Brown S, Williams K, Boyle A, Johnston B J Intensive Care Soc. 2025; 26(1):11-20.

PMID: 39801629 PMC: 11724402. DOI: 10.1177/17511437241312113.

Prioritizing attributes of approaches to analyzing patient-centered outcomes that are truncated due to death in critical care clinical trials: a Delphi study.

Bahti M, Kahan B, Li F, Harhay M, Auriemma C Trials. 2025; 26(1):15.

PMID: 39794867 PMC: 11721323. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-024-08673-x.

References

Deutschman C, Ahrens T, Cairns C, Sessler C, Parsons P . Multisociety Task Force for Critical Care Research: key issues and recommendations. Crit Care Med. 2011; 40(1):254-60. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182377fdd. View

Chan K, Friedman L, Dinglas V, Hough C, Shanholtz C, Wesley Ely E . Are physical measures related to patient-centred outcomes in ARDS survivors?. Thorax. 2017; 72(10):884-892. PMC: 6888961. DOI: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2016-209400. View

Guyatt G, Oxman A, Vist G, Kunz R, Falck-Ytter Y, Alonso-Coello P . GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2008; 336(7650):924-6. PMC: 2335261. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.39489.470347.AD. View

Guyatt G, Oxman A, Kunz R, Atkins D, Brozek J, Vist G . GRADE guidelines: 2. Framing the question and deciding on important outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011; 64(4):395-400. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.09.012. View

Prinsen C, Vohra S, Rose M, Boers M, Tugwell P, Clarke M . How to select outcome measurement instruments for outcomes included in a "Core Outcome Set" - a practical guideline. Trials. 2016; 17(1):449. PMC: 5020549. DOI: 10.1186/s13063-016-1555-2. View

Angus D, Carlet J . Surviving intensive care: a report from the 2002 Brussels Roundtable. Intensive Care Med. 2003; 29(3):368-77. DOI: 10.1007/s00134-002-1624-8. View

Turnbull A, Sepulveda K, Dinglas V, Chessare C, Bingham 3rd C, Needham D . Core Domains for Clinical Research in Acute Respiratory Failure Survivors: An International Modified Delphi Consensus Study. Crit Care Med. 2017; 45(6):1001-1010. PMC: 5433919. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002435. View

Parker A, Sricharoenchai T, Raparla S, Schneck K, Bienvenu O, Needham D . Posttraumatic stress disorder in critical illness survivors: a metaanalysis. Crit Care Med. 2015; 43(5):1121-9. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000882. View

Angus D, Mira J, Vincent J . Improving clinical trials in the critically ill. Crit Care Med. 2009; 38(2):527-32. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181c0259d. View

10.

Williamson P, Altman D, Blazeby J, Clarke M, Devane D, Gargon E . Developing core outcome sets for clinical trials: issues to consider. Trials. 2012; 13:132. PMC: 3472231. DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-13-132. View

11.

Chan K, Pfoh E, Denehy L, Elliott D, Holland A, Dinglas V . Construct validity and minimal important difference of 6-minute walk distance in survivors of acute respiratory failure. Chest. 2015; 147(5):1316-1326. PMC: 4420183. DOI: 10.1378/chest.14-1808. View

12.

Needham D, Dinglas V, Bienvenu O, Colantuoni E, Wozniak A, Rice T . One year outcomes in patients with acute lung injury randomised to initial trophic or full enteral feeding: prospective follow-up of EDEN randomised trial. BMJ. 2013; 346:f1532. PMC: 3601941. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.f1532. View

13.

Needham D, Davidson J, Cohen H, Hopkins R, Weinert C, Wunsch H . Improving long-term outcomes after discharge from intensive care unit: report from a stakeholders' conference. Crit Care Med. 2011; 40(2):502-9. DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e318232da75. View

14.

Gorst S, Gargon E, Clarke M, Smith V, Williamson P . Choosing Important Health Outcomes for Comparative Effectiveness Research: An Updated Review and Identification of Gaps. PLoS One. 2016; 11(12):e0168403. PMC: 5156438. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0168403. View

15.

Kirkham J, Dwan K, Altman D, Gamble C, Dodd S, Smyth R . The impact of outcome reporting bias in randomised controlled trials on a cohort of systematic reviews. BMJ. 2010; 340:c365. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.c365. View

16.

Dwan K, Altman D, Arnaiz J, Bloom J, Chan A, Cronin E . Systematic review of the empirical evidence of study publication bias and outcome reporting bias. PLoS One. 2008; 3(8):e3081. PMC: 2518111. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0003081. View

17.

Huang D, Angus D, Moss M, Thompson B, Ferguson N, Ginde A . Design and Rationale of the Reevaluation of Systemic Early Neuromuscular Blockade Trial for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016; 14(1):124-133. PMC: 5291480. DOI: 10.1513/AnnalsATS.201608-629OT. View

18.

Hays R, Morales L . The RAND-36 measure of health-related quality of life. Ann Med. 2001; 33(5):350-7. DOI: 10.3109/07853890109002089. View

19.

Needham D, Wozniak A, Hough C, Morris P, Dinglas V, Jackson J . Risk factors for physical impairment after acute lung injury in a national, multicenter study. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014; 189(10):1214-24. PMC: 4061900. DOI: 10.1164/rccm.201401-0158OC. View

20.

Major M, Kwakman R, Kho M, Connolly B, McWilliams D, Denehy L . Surviving critical illness: what is next? An expert consensus statement on physical rehabilitation after hospital discharge. Crit Care. 2016; 20(1):354. PMC: 5086052. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-016-1508-x. View