» Articles » PMID: 31857715

Evolutionary Classification of CRISPR-Cas Systems: a Burst of Class 2 and Derived Variants

Abstract

The number and diversity of known CRISPR-Cas systems have substantially increased in recent years. Here, we provide an updated evolutionary classification of CRISPR-Cas systems and cas genes, with an emphasis on the major developments that have occurred since the publication of the latest classification, in 2015. The new classification includes 2 classes, 6 types and 33 subtypes, compared with 5 types and 16 subtypes in 2015. A key development is the ongoing discovery of multiple, novel class 2 CRISPR-Cas systems, which now include 3 types and 17 subtypes. A second major novelty is the discovery of numerous derived CRISPR-Cas variants, often associated with mobile genetic elements that lack the nucleases required for interference. Some of these variants are involved in RNA-guided transposition, whereas others are predicted to perform functions distinct from adaptive immunity that remain to be characterized experimentally. The third highlight is the discovery of numerous families of ancillary CRISPR-linked genes, often implicated in signal transduction. Together, these findings substantially clarify the functional diversity and evolutionary history of CRISPR-Cas.

Citing Articles

Internal in-frame translation generates Cas11b, which is important for effective interference in an archaeal CRISPR-Cas system.

Sailer A, Brendel J, Chernev A, Konig S, Bischler T, Grafenhan T Front Microbiol. 2025; 16:1543464.

PMID: 40078539 PMC: 11899642. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1543464.


Insight into crRNA Processing in P42S and Application of SmutCas9 in Genome Editing.

Mosterd C, Moineau S Int J Mol Sci. 2025; 26(5).

PMID: 40076628 PMC: 11900481. DOI: 10.3390/ijms26052005.


Insights into the compact CRISPR-Cas9d system.

Yang J, Wang T, Huang Y, Long Z, Li X, Zhang S Nat Commun. 2025; 16(1):2462.

PMID: 40075056 PMC: 11903963. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-025-57455-9.


Non-viral intron knock-ins for targeted gene integration into human T cells and for T-cell selection.

Roth T, Lu J, McClellan A, Kernick C, Takacsi-Nagy O, Satpathy A Nat Biomed Eng. 2025; .

PMID: 40055580 DOI: 10.1038/s41551-025-01372-1.


CRISPR-Cas applications in agriculture and plant research.

Tuncel A, Pan C, Clem J, Liu D, Qi Y Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2025; .

PMID: 40055491 DOI: 10.1038/s41580-025-00834-3.


References
1.
Harrington L, Burstein D, Chen J, Paez-Espino D, Ma E, Witte I . Programmed DNA destruction by miniature CRISPR-Cas14 enzymes. Science. 2018; 362(6416):839-842. PMC: 6659742. DOI: 10.1126/science.aav4294. View

2.
Smargon A, Cox D, Pyzocha N, Zheng K, Slaymaker I, Gootenberg J . Cas13b Is a Type VI-B CRISPR-Associated RNA-Guided RNase Differentially Regulated by Accessory Proteins Csx27 and Csx28. Mol Cell. 2017; 65(4):618-630.e7. PMC: 5432119. DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2016.12.023. View

3.
Makarova K, Wolf Y, Koonin E . The basic building blocks and evolution of CRISPR-CAS systems. Biochem Soc Trans. 2013; 41(6):1392-400. PMC: 5898231. DOI: 10.1042/BST20130038. View

4.
Athukoralage J, Rouillon C, Graham S, Gruschow S, White M . Ring nucleases deactivate type III CRISPR ribonucleases by degrading cyclic oligoadenylate. Nature. 2018; 562(7726):277-280. PMC: 6219705. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-018-0557-5. View

5.
Makarova K, Koonin E . Annotation and Classification of CRISPR-Cas Systems. Methods Mol Biol. 2015; 1311:47-75. PMC: 5901762. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-2687-9_4. View